Reasoning.Services - Your AI validates bad decisions. These tools challenge them.

Most AI tools inject a system prompt the model can ignore. Ours bind the agent to stages it has to walk — and leave a record of what was considered. Four MCP tools. Four failure modes your AI misses: → Structured Reflection — break agent loops → Sequential Thinking — no skipping steps → Context Switcher — multiple perspectives → Decision Matrix — weighted, scored, defensible Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Copilot.

Hey PH 👋 Erin here, founder of Reasoning Services. I built this because I got tired of my AI agreeing with me. Not in a philosophical way — in a "shipped the wrong database architecture because Claude validated my premise in 4 seconds" way. The kind of mistake that costs 3 weeks to unwind. The problem isn't that AI is wrong. It's that AI is wrong in ways that feel right. A sycophantic model doesn't give you garbage — it gives you a polished, confident version of whatever you were already thinking. That's harder to catch than an obvious error. So I built MCP tools that bind the agent to a structured process instead of just asking it to "be more critical." Prompts are suggestions. These are contracts. Would love your honest feedback — especially if you've felt this pain with Claude Code, Cursor, or Windsurf. What failure mode hits you hardest? Try free for 14 days: reasoning.services

Reasoning.Services - Your AI validates bad decisions. These tools challenge them.

Replies