NeuraPent
Find Out Whats Exploitable. In Hours, Not Weeks.
Start new thread

NeuraPent - Find Out Whats Exploitable. In Hours, Not Weeks.

by•
Traditional pentests are accurate but slow and stale by delivery. NeuraPent closes that gap: autonomous agents map your attack surface, chain findings into real multi-step attack paths, then safely run non-destructive PoCs to prove exploitability before it hits your report. You get verified exploit chains with evidence logs, executive risk ratings, and dev-ready fixes, continuously re-validated as your environment changes.

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Maker
📌
Hey Product Hunt! I'm Areeba, founder of NeuraPent. I kept running into the same problem in security work: scanners flag theoretical CVEs you have to manually triage, and traditional pentests are accurate but take weeks, by the time you get the report, your environment's already changed. Neither gives you a real answer to "is this actually exploitable, right now?" That question is what NeuraPent is built around. Early on, I focused purely on detection accuracy, but I realized detection alone wasn't enough; the only way to kill false positives for good was to actually attempt exploitation, safely. That shift shaped the whole architecture: autonomous agents that map your attack surface, chain individual weaknesses into real multi-step attack paths (the way an actual attacker would), and run non-destructive PoC exploits to confirm exploitability before anything hits your report. The result is continuous validation instead of a once-a-year snapshot, with zero-agent deployment and evidence-backed findings your dev team can act on immediately. Would love your feedback, what would make this indispensable for your security stack?

Would love to see a Slack or Teams integration that pushes only critical verified chains to a chosen channel as they happen, so our on-call team can react fast instead of waiting for the next report run.

Maker

 thats a solid idea honestly, would definitely consider it in next updates, stay tuned so you know when we ship new features, and keep sharing your opinions, it matters as we are at initial stage

Love the idea of chaining findings into multi-step paths, that's where most pentest reports fall flat for me. One thing that would make this way more useful: a way to scope what the agents are allowed to probe, so I can run it against staging or a subset of prod without worrying it'll wander into something sensitive.

Maker

 it does have proper scope manager so that AI doesnt wander around things out of scope, at every step its verified thats its performed on in-scope asset, and when AI even shows a hint of trying something out of scope,that action is immediately blocked and AI is given live feedback about the reason

Mapped our staging env in under an hour and the chained attack path it surfaced through three internal services was spot on, not something I'd have written a test for myself.