Intrinsiqq
Free stock analyzer and quality scores for 8,000 US stocks
Start new thread
Flippie

Intrinsiqq - Free stock analyzer and quality scores for 8,000 US stocks

by•
Intrinsiqq is a stock analysis platform that pulls 10+ years of financials straight from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings, computes a quality score across 8 fundamental dimensions, runs a DCF valuation with sensitivity analysis, and grades dividend sustainability for 8,000+ US-listed companies. Full methodology documented at intrinsiqq.com/methodology. Free tier covers core analysis with daily lookup limits. Pro lifts the caps and unlocks editable DCF. Premium adds advanced portfolio tracking

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Flippie
Maker
📌
Hey Hunters, founder of Intrinsiqq here! As a retail investor, I am always looking for the best quality companies to buy on the stock market. In November 2025, I came up with the idea of building an easy to use stock analysis tool. I built this around three things I could not find together anywhere else. First, a quality score that is glanceable in seconds, scored across margins, growth, returns on capital, and balance sheet, so you can read a business at a glance instead of digging through 10-Ks. Second, charting you can rebuild from scratch to test any thesis, instead of being locked into pre-baked views. Third, data pulled straight from SEC EDGAR XBRL filings, so the numbers are as fresh and clean as what companies report to regulators. Three things that took the longest to build: 1. EDGAR XBRL parsing. The SEC's tag taxonomy drifts across years and companies, so I have a custom mapping layer to handle the "this company reports revenue under a different tag than that company" problem. 2. Quality score weights. I spent weeks calibrating the 8 inputs against historical returns. The result is documented at intrinsiqq.com/methodology if you want to push back on the weights. 3. DCF that does not hide its assumptions. There is a sensitivity grid on every DCF page so you see how the fair value changes with different WACC and growth assumptions. Pricing: the free tier covers the full analysis (quality score, DCF, dividends, financials) for 5 stock lookups per day. Pro ($12/mo) lifts that to unlimited lookups, 10+ years of data instead of 5, and editable DCF sliders. Premium ($22/mo) adds portfolio tracking. I wanted free to be genuinely useful, not a teaser, so the analysis pages are not gated by tier. Curious to hear what people think of the methodology! Example pages: - intrinsiqq.com/stock/AAPL - intrinsiqq.com/stock/JNJ/dividends - intrinsiqq.com/methodology
Anna Jarrett

@flippiefinance Wow!! This is fantastic! I love how on mobile the dashboard kpi cards aren’t just static, they’re fully dynamic. That’s so useful and such a hard thing to execute at a small scale! I love the “what stands out” and “what’s growing” insights. You just gained a user.

Flippie
Maker

@anna_jarrett Anna, this genuinely made my morning! :) The dynamic mobile cards were honestly one of the most painful things to get right, keeping them fully live without wrecking performance on a small budget took way too many late nights (but it's so worth it!!), so it means a lot that they landed for you.

And you picked up on the two things I care about most: the "what stands out" and "what's growing" insights. The whole goal was to surface the story in the numbers, not just dump a table on you.

Now I have to ask, what's the first stock you're going to run through it? Genuinely curious what you'll think of the quality score on something you know well. And if anything feels off or missing, tell me straight, that's exactly the feedback that makes it better 🙌

Anna Jarrett
@flippiefinance as someone who has worked with complex systems, Kubernetes KPIs, and cloud cost for many years, I know exactly what you mean about the dynamic cards. Even on desktop as larger cards they can be tricky. They are very well executed and super snappy! I ran IBM through it and coming from Apple stocks this is far more impactful for me. As someone who has stocks and hadn’t quite gotten around to fully understanding them, I think a view for the newcomers would be helpful to vet users just getting started with stocks. Maybe a third button; [watchlist] [compare] [guidance] that gives a little extra detail within a card for jargon terms, maybe tooltips for labels on cards like Profitability and Returns. However, I would look at this more like a novice view. Not something to be present for power users. I can definitely see that being a huge edge case that differentiates Intrinsiqq from competitors.
Flippie
Maker

@anna_jarrett This is exactly the kind of feedback I was hoping for, thank you!

Coming from someone who's lived in Kubernetes KPIs and cloud cost dashboards, snappy means a lot, that was the whole obsession.

And you've hit on something I genuinely go back and forth on. The "novice view" idea is spot on: the data is only powerful if it doesn't intimidate the person who's new to fundamentals. Tooltips on labels like Profitability and Returns are honestly low-hanging fruit I should have already done, that's going on the list today.
We do have a lot of tooltips already but I agree that we should maybe clarify these too!
The guided third button (watchlist / compare / guidance) is a bigger idea but I love it, especially the "explain this metric in plain English" angle for newcomers.

Quick question while I have you: when you ran IBM, which specific terms or numbers made you pause and think "I'd want this explained"? If I can capture the exact moments a smart-but-new user hesitates, that's the novice view designing itself. You might be helping shape the next feature here ;)

Anna Jarrett

@flippiefinance I'm so happy I could be of help! I completely understand about tooltips having slid through the cracks. I do think it's very important to refine the major behaviors like you've done before diving into micro-interactions. I personally have a difficult time with all of the acronyms. Take the Valuations and Multiples section, there are important metrics there, a novice may either not be knowledgable on the acronyms there or have forgotten the meaning ie. it hadn't yet been drilled in.