Git-style branching for your entire backend. Spin off a branch to get a full, isolated copy of everything: your database, storage, auth, edge functions, and more, ready for your agents to experiment on without touching production.
Replies
Best
sounds very interesting! do we get merge conflict here as well? :D
@ashishkingdom Yes we do! We can branch diff so you can easily tell what did the agent do.
Report
Congratulations! This feels like a missing primitive for agentic development.
Do you plan to support protected-branch-style policies for backend changes? Especially, to stop agents from modifying RLS, auth, billing schemas, or other high-risk areas without human approval?
Feels like backend governance is the natural next layer after diffs.
Hey guys! I'm @tonychang430 , co-founder of InsForge 👋
Coding agents are getting incredibly good at building software. The problem isn't capability anymore! It's trust.
Most people still hesitate before letting an agent touch production. And honestly, they should. One bad migration, one accidental deletion, or one wrong configuration can take down critical infrastructure in seconds.
We believe the future isn't about replacing humans. It's about giving humans confidence in what agents are doing.
That's why Backend Branching is so exciting to us.
Instead of giving agents direct access to production, every change happens inside an isolated backend branch!
It is a complete clone of your backend, including your database, auth, storage, functions, and configuration.
Agents can move fast, experiment freely, and build against a real environment without putting production at risk.
Then, just like a pull request for code, humans stay in control. You can review the exact changes, approve them, reject them, or ask the agent to fix conflicts before anything reaches production.
Our vision is simple: agents should be able to move at machine speed while humans maintain visibility, control, and trust.
We're excited to hear what you think and would love any feedback from the Product Hunt community ❤️
Been working with HH and insforge team for a few months!!! Witnessing how fast the team iterate the product and launching campaigns from open source and now product hunt! congrats to your biggg milestone and many ahead!
@yan_labs_ If parent and branch both changed the same object since T0 and the result diverges, we block the merge instead of guessing. The goal is to give your coding agent the conflict context, let it fix the branch, then retry the merge safely.
Report
The real unlock here is not just safety it's agent velocity. when an agent does not have to be cautious about breaking production, it moves significantly faster and takes more direct paths to solutions. that speed compounding over hundreds of tasks is the actual ROI and i think it's slightly undersold in how you are positioning this right now.
@imogen_wallace 100%. Safety is the first-order problem, but velocity is the compounding effect. When agents have a real isolated backend, they can take bolder paths without putting production at risk.
Report
congrats to the team! can multiple coding agents work on separate branches simultaneously? how do you prevent conflicts when they merge back?
@olivia_bennett7 yes, multiple agents can work on separate backend branches at the same time. Each branch is isolated, then merge uses a 3-way diff against the parent. If two branches changed the same backend object differently, the merge is blocked with conflict context instead of guessing.
@olivia_bennett7 yes! it's designed for multiple agents to be working on different branches! just like git worktrees! If there are conflicts agents can figure out what's wrong and merge it correctly!
Report
congrats on the launch! how does conflict detection work when two branches modify the same backend resources?does the agent receive guidance on resolving them?
@emily_carter18 yes. We compare parent at branch creation, parent now, and branch now. If the same table / policy / function / config diverges, we block the merge and show a conflict report. The agent can use that context to fix the branch, then retry.
Replies
sounds very interesting! do we get merge conflict here as well? :D
InsForge
@ashishkingdom Yes we do! We can branch diff so you can easily tell what did the agent do.
Congratulations! This feels like a missing primitive for agentic development.
Do you plan to support protected-branch-style policies for backend changes? Especially, to stop agents from modifying RLS, auth, billing schemas, or other high-risk areas without human approval?
Feels like backend governance is the natural next layer after diffs.
InsForge
@jesecamilo Thanks for your feedback! We would definitely consider that to make a safer agentic development workflow!
InsForge
Hey guys! I'm @tonychang430 , co-founder of InsForge 👋
Coding agents are getting incredibly good at building software. The problem isn't capability anymore! It's trust.
Most people still hesitate before letting an agent touch production. And honestly, they should. One bad migration, one accidental deletion, or one wrong configuration can take down critical infrastructure in seconds.
We believe the future isn't about replacing humans. It's about giving humans confidence in what agents are doing.
That's why Backend Branching is so exciting to us.
Instead of giving agents direct access to production, every change happens inside an isolated backend branch!
It is a complete clone of your backend, including your database, auth, storage, functions, and configuration.
Agents can move fast, experiment freely, and build against a real environment without putting production at risk.
Then, just like a pull request for code, humans stay in control. You can review the exact changes, approve them, reject them, or ask the agent to fix conflicts before anything reaches production.
Our vision is simple: agents should be able to move at machine speed while humans maintain visibility, control, and trust.
We're excited to hear what you think and would love any feedback from the Product Hunt community ❤️
This is super cool. Congrats!!
InsForge
@taro_f Thanks!!
this is the way of building AI-native products post AI-era!
InsForge
@dr_alaska Agreed!
Been working with HH and insforge team for a few months!!! Witnessing how fast the team iterate the product and launching campaigns from open source and now product hunt! congrats to your biggg milestone and many ahead!
Kollab
How conservative is the merge blocker when there is a potential conflict?
InsForge
@yan_labs_ If parent and branch both changed the same object since T0 and the result diverges, we block the merge instead of guessing.
The goal is to give your coding agent the conflict context, let it fix the branch, then retry the merge safely.
The real unlock here is not just safety it's agent velocity. when an agent does not have to be cautious about breaking production, it moves significantly faster and takes more direct paths to solutions. that speed compounding over hundreds of tasks is the actual ROI and i think it's slightly undersold in how you are positioning this right now.
InsForge
@imogen_wallace 100%. Safety is the first-order problem, but velocity is the compounding effect. When agents have a real isolated backend, they can take bolder paths without putting production at risk.
congrats to the team!
can multiple coding agents work on separate branches simultaneously? how do you prevent conflicts when they merge back?
InsForge
@olivia_bennett7 yes, multiple agents can work on separate backend branches at the same time. Each branch is isolated, then merge uses a 3-way diff against the parent. If two branches changed the same backend object differently, the merge is blocked with conflict context instead of guessing.
InsForge
@olivia_bennett7 yes! it's designed for multiple agents to be working on different branches! just like git worktrees! If there are conflicts agents can figure out what's wrong and merge it correctly!
congrats on the launch!
how does conflict detection work when two branches modify the same backend resources?does the agent receive guidance on resolving them?
InsForge
@emily_carter18 yes. We compare parent at branch creation, parent now, and branch now. If the same table / policy / function / config diverges, we block the merge and show a conflict report. The agent can use that context to fix the branch, then retry.