In Parallel MCP - Your context, available to every agent.
byβ’
You've explained your company to ChatGPT. Then to Claude. Then to Copilot.
Every time you open a new chat, you start from scratch. Paste the notes. Upload the document. Copy in the email thread. Summarize what your team decided two weeks ago β to a tool that could've just known it all along.
In Parallel's MCP server ends that. Connect it once, and whichever AI you open already knows your meetings, decisions, and context. Just ask the question. Less prose. More truth.

Replies
In Parallel
Okay, as promised, I'll go first π
Mine was a weekly "alignment sync" that survived three reorgs. The project it was created for shipped in 2023. Nobody remembered why it existed, but nobody wanted to be the one to kill it β so every Monday, eight people spent 30 minutes confirming there was nothing to align on.
It finally died when someone noticed the original organizer had left the company a year earlier.
That meeting is basically why In Parallel exists. If the decisions and status lived somewhere that updated itself, the meeting would have had nothing left to do.
Your turn β what's yours? π
Really interesting approach to the LLM memory bottleneck standard custom instructions are too static, and vector databases get too noisy. Does your self-hosted VPC setup allow us to restrict sensitive context folders so only specific teams (like HR or Finance) can query them?
In Parallel
@priya_kushwaha1Β Thanks so much, couldn't agree more. We do not at the moment offer VPC setup, but are working on that option; what is important is that we offer no-training on your data (ISO 42001 certified, and SOC2 compliant).
SOC 2 Type II for an MCP context layer is exactly the boring enterprise signal I'd look for
In Parallel
@oleksandr_knygaΒ 100%. Not only that, we got also ISO 42001. While not as hot yet, I'd say it'll be the future. If interested, here's some more boring stuff: https://podcasts.apple.com/cz/podcast/episode-1-pioneers-of-the-new-ai-standard-iso-42001/id1790620457?i=1000684062280&l=cs
One thing that would make this a no-brainer for me is a mobile companion app. Most of my context-switching happens away from my desk, and being able to quickly check on goals, risks, or ownership changes from my phone would keep me aligned even when I'm not at my laptop. A simple read-only view with the ability to flag updates would be enough.
In Parallel
@eyll09641878946Β .. did you just read our roadmap? Working on it!
This bit me two weeks ago, a rule I set at planning stage silently disappeared before the generation step and the output invented a fact. Took a day to find where the context died. So, real question: two agents pull the same context, one updates it mid-task, what happens? Last write wins or something smarter?
In Parallel
@vladimir_iudinΒ yeah, I hate when that happens. Well, we're building and maintaining decisions-based context that is the artefact e.g. something that can work for between people, not just between sessions. But to pull that off it is something smarter: so we save the "graph" of events and relationships, and use that.
@kristian_luomaΒ Saving the graph instead of raw context answers it, yeah. "Between people, not just between sessions" is the part I'm going to sit with, my per-client fact bases are still session-shaped and that's probably a ceiling I haven't hit yet. Thanks Kristian.
The portability problem is the real one: context trapped in each tool means every agent is a stranger. Building on MCP is the right bet because it standardizes that layer instead of locking it to one app. The test will be keeping context fresh, stale shared context is worse than none.
In Parallel
@shivangit26Β Amen.
Calendbook.com v1
As a CPO this hits a nerve π The gap between "what we decided in the room" and "what's actually on the roadmap" is where half my week disappears. Every tool captures something β notes, tickets, docs β but the decision itself always seems to fall through the cracks. Love that In Parallel sits underneath instead of adding yet another surface to babysit. Pricing per workspace instead of per seat is the right call too. Congrats on the launch, upvoted π