A faster agent delivers promos/shorts, explainers, kinetic type and PRO motion graphics with audio. Ditch AE/PR/CapCut. Chat to refine and ship impact.
Hi Product Hunt! 👋I’m Yunfei, the founder of PageOn. Happy to be back with our new tool: iArt.
Creating high-quality videos shouldn't require rendering queues or specialized training. We've spent months crafting iArt as a web-based, chat-driven video agent to change that:
🎬 No Timelines: Ditch complex editors. Tell the agent what to change, and it rebuilds scenes, typography, and timing.
🎧 Voiceover & BGM: Generate synchronized narration and bgm during the initial one-click creation.
📦 Batch Render: Generate an entire video series at once with a single prompt.
🎨 Brand Consistency: Mention your assets in chat to keep every output natively on-brand.
✨ AI Gen & Web Search: Toggle switches to let the agent auto-generate imagery or pull real-time web visuals.
A quick heads-up: Since iArt is entirely prompt-driven, we replaced the manual canvas with simple chat. While it takes a brief shift in habits, it completely removes the pain of pixel-pushing.
We are launching today to see how our agent performs in your daily workflows. We desperately want your brutal feedback to help us improve. What video are you making next? Let's see if iArt can solve it! 🚀
Dope! If I write a highly detailed, scene-by-scene prompt, does the agent actually follow all the instructions, or does it tend to simplify things to fit standard structures?
@alstonzhuang Thanks! It’s a great question, and to give you an honest technical answer: our Agent is designed to follow complex, detailed instructions, and in the vast majority of cases, it sticks strictly to the details you provide. In fact, the richer and more specific your prompt is, the better the final cinematic output will be.
However, because multi-scene long prompts can sometimes cause the AI to occasionally skip an edge-case detail, here is an insider pro-tip to make the Agent execute your scene-by-scene script flawlessly:
Structure your input with clear sections, such as:
- Duration (e.g., scene lengths)
- Global Rules (e.g., visual style, tone)
- Visuals + Script (the exact scene-by-scene action)
- Voiceover / Dialogue Lines (you can even specify the pacing here—just remember to select your preferred voice from our list first!)
When formatted this way, the Agent handles the complexity beautifully without trying to simplify your creative vision. 💡 Here’s the shortcut: If you don't want to format all of this manually, you'll love the "Enhance prompt" magic wand button right next to the enter key in our chat bar.
We’d love for you to drop your most detailed script in and push our Agent to its limits!
Report
Generating temporally coherent animation from static design assets is genuinely hard. Frame-to-frame consistency breaks down fast, especially with crisp edges like logos or UI elements. We've experimented with a few text-to-video pipelines and that's always where things fall apart. What's your approach to maintaining consistency across frames when the source asset has hard edges or precise typography?
@anand_thakkar1 we are still on the way, quite hard actually, we tried a looot of ways to upgrade the agent. I think the key is about letting the agent focus on the brand or style guidiance. component libs also helps !
@thamibenjelloun yes， you can try the brand function . or strict prompt .
Report
Looks cool!! Congrats. I personally am not hugely familiar with this landscape but I do use CapCut for Reels, marketing, etc. Could you explain the difference between your product and the AI generator within CapCut? Full disclosure I haven't used that feature in CapCut but am just curious about what's different
@millwiller Hey Will! Thanks so much for the great question 🙌
Both are great tools, maybe just built for different workflows. CapCut’s AI features are add-ons to its powerful, timeline-based editor — they give you tons of manual control, but still require hands-on tweaks to pacing, graphics, and transitions after the initial generate.
iArt, by contrast, is fully AI-native. We built it for creators who want results fast, without the learning curve. For non-professional users especially, the AI’s ability to interpret your request and deliver a polished video quickly is often more practical than endless manual controls. You just chat with the agent to refine anything you need — no timeline, no keyframes, no tedious edits required.
Report
@lizzy_leeeee Got it, thanks! Makes total sense. I could also imagine the same user switching between the two depending on the type of content they are looking to create.
Report
Bold claim to ditch AE/PR lol. As someone who tests AI workflows daily, I’m curious to see how 'PRO motion graphics' compares to manual refinement. Is the 'Chat to refine' loop fast enough for a professional workflow, or is it better suited to rapid prototyping?
@diana_nadim2 Hi Diana! Thanks a lot for your great questions.
We’d like to view professional motion graphics in a balanced way. Our product is mainly built for general users, especially those who struggle with ideation or lack professional editing skills. Our AI agent helps them easily create decent visual results.
As our founder mentioned, iArt is fully prompt-driven, replacing the traditional manual canvas with simple chat. We also offer "Choose Element"and "Capture Frame" tools for precise and quick editing. That said, the experience can vary a bit depending on your network speed and patience. 🤣 And the system works well for both formal production and rapid prototyping. We actually create all our social media content across platforms with iArt. Beyond regular "+ New Project" feature, our "Batch Render" is quite practical: you can pick a preferred version from the batch to remix or polish further, or ask the AI to generate entirely new takes.
We really hope you can try out our product and share your feedback with us!
Report
The framing around 'ditching AE/CapCut' is sharp positioning — anyone who's tried to produce motion graphics professionally knows the learning curve is brutal. What I'm curious about: for creators who do short-form content (reels, product demos, explainers), how much creative control do you have over pacing and transitions? Does the AI interpret your brief or do you still guide it shot-by-shot?
@theshumba Hi Melusi! Thanks for loving our positioning.
For short videos, you can set overall pacing, transitions and style directly via text. No need to guide frame by frame — just tell the AI your requirements and it will adjust accordingly.
If you have super specific ideas and want the AI to follow your instructions strictly without creative tweaks, simply state it clearly, and it will fully comply.
Occasionally preview loading issues are caused by cache. Just press Ctrl + Shift + R to hard refresh, and you’ll see the latest updates.
You can also ask the AI about its creation logic anytime in the chat panel. It will explain details from both artistic and technical perspectives. Enjoy using it!
Report
the PRO motion graphics claim is the one worth stress testing. motion graphics that actually look professional require precise timing, easing curves, and compositional decisions that most AI video tools either ignore or handle generically. curious what the actual output looks like on something like a product launch promo versus a kinetic type animation and whether the results are production-ready or starting points that still need significant refinement
@ansari_adin Hi Ansari, you hit the nail on the head — this is exactly the question we obsess over. Sometimes it feels like the quality really starts with the prompt. If you set clear structure, tone, and context upfront, the first output is usually already production-ready for most use cases — just quick tweaks like font size or element positioning are often all you need. To give you a sense of what it can do, here's another launch video in a different visual style — it was made in under 15 minutes. That said, AI still has its “lottery moments”, so we don’t claim perfection. Sometimes the first pass needs more refinement, but the chat loop lets you adjust those fine details without rebuilding from scratch. Even if you do want to start fresh, whether you ask the agent to redo it right in the same thread or duplicate the project to iterate freely, the heavy lifting is all on the AI — you just get to call the shots. Whether it’s a product launch promo or kinetic type animation, we’ve built the agent to handle both, and we’re constantly refining how it interprets those professional-level details.
Thanks for calling this out — it’s why we test rigorously every day! 🎬
@jiaqichen Appreciate the love! Cheers to a future with fewer keyframe headaches. We'd love to hear your thoughts once you try it out—let us know how it compares to your usual workflow!
Report
Does iArt rely on a set of pre-made templates that it fills, or is the layout generated entirely dynamically based on the prompt's context?
@summer_tao Great question! iArt is primarily powered by dynamic generation, but we also support templates. Even better, you can explore and remix any community-created layouts from our showcase!
We are currently fast-tracking the development of a brand-new batch of premium templates to give you even more design flexibility. Stay tuned for the upcoming updates!
Replies
PageOn.ai
Hi Product Hunt! 👋I’m Yunfei, the founder of PageOn. Happy to be back with our new tool: iArt.
Creating high-quality videos shouldn't require rendering queues or specialized training. We've spent months crafting iArt as a web-based, chat-driven video agent to change that:
🎬 No Timelines: Ditch complex editors. Tell the agent what to change, and it rebuilds scenes, typography, and timing.
🎧 Voiceover & BGM: Generate synchronized narration and bgm during the initial one-click creation.
📦 Batch Render: Generate an entire video series at once with a single prompt.
🎨 Brand Consistency: Mention your assets in chat to keep every output natively on-brand.
✨ AI Gen & Web Search: Toggle switches to let the agent auto-generate imagery or pull real-time web visuals.
A quick heads-up: Since iArt is entirely prompt-driven, we replaced the manual canvas with simple chat. While it takes a brief shift in habits, it completely removes the pain of pixel-pushing.
We are launching today to see how our agent performs in your daily workflows. We desperately want your brutal feedback to help us improve. What video are you making next? Let's see if iArt can solve it! 🚀
Terminal Mode by Even Realities
Dope!
If I write a highly detailed, scene-by-scene prompt, does the agent actually follow all the instructions, or does it tend to simplify things to fit standard structures?
iArt.ai
@alstonzhuang Thanks! It’s a great question, and to give you an honest technical answer: our Agent is designed to follow complex, detailed instructions, and in the vast majority of cases, it sticks strictly to the details you provide. In fact, the richer and more specific your prompt is, the better the final cinematic output will be.
However, because multi-scene long prompts can sometimes cause the AI to occasionally skip an edge-case detail, here is an insider pro-tip to make the Agent execute your scene-by-scene script flawlessly:
Structure your input with clear sections, such as:
- Duration (e.g., scene lengths)
- Global Rules (e.g., visual style, tone)
- Visuals + Script (the exact scene-by-scene action)
- Voiceover / Dialogue Lines (you can even specify the pacing here—just remember to select your preferred voice from our list first!)
When formatted this way, the Agent handles the complexity beautifully without trying to simplify your creative vision.
💡 Here’s the shortcut: If you don't want to format all of this manually, you'll love the "Enhance prompt" magic wand button right next to the enter key in our chat bar.
We’d love for you to drop your most detailed script in and push our Agent to its limits!
Generating temporally coherent animation from static design assets is genuinely hard. Frame-to-frame consistency breaks down fast, especially with crisp edges like logos or UI elements. We've experimented with a few text-to-video pipelines and that's always where things fall apart. What's your approach to maintaining consistency across frames when the source asset has hard edges or precise typography?
PageOn.ai
@anand_thakkar1 we are still on the way, quite hard actually, we tried a looot of ways to upgrade the agent. I think the key is about letting the agent focus on the brand or style guidiance. component libs also helps !
Mailwarm
Can you lock brand fonts and colors so every export stays on style?
PageOn.ai
@thamibenjelloun yes， you can try the brand function . or strict prompt .
Looks cool!! Congrats. I personally am not hugely familiar with this landscape but I do use CapCut for Reels, marketing, etc. Could you explain the difference between your product and the AI generator within CapCut? Full disclosure I haven't used that feature in CapCut but am just curious about what's different
iArt.ai
@millwiller Hey Will! Thanks so much for the great question 🙌
Both are great tools, maybe just built for different workflows.
CapCut’s AI features are add-ons to its powerful, timeline-based editor — they give you tons of manual control, but still require hands-on tweaks to pacing, graphics, and transitions after the initial generate.
iArt, by contrast, is fully AI-native. We built it for creators who want results fast, without the learning curve. For non-professional users especially, the AI’s ability to interpret your request and deliver a polished video quickly is often more practical than endless manual controls. You just chat with the agent to refine anything you need — no timeline, no keyframes, no tedious edits required.
@lizzy_leeeee Got it, thanks! Makes total sense. I could also imagine the same user switching between the two depending on the type of content they are looking to create.
Bold claim to ditch AE/PR lol. As someone who tests AI workflows daily, I’m curious to see how 'PRO motion graphics' compares to manual refinement. Is the 'Chat to refine' loop fast enough for a professional workflow, or is it better suited to rapid prototyping?
iArt.ai
@diana_nadim2 Hi Diana! Thanks a lot for your great questions.
We’d like to view professional motion graphics in a balanced way. Our product is mainly built for general users, especially those who struggle with ideation or lack professional editing skills. Our AI agent helps them easily create decent visual results.
As our founder mentioned, iArt is fully prompt-driven, replacing the traditional manual canvas with simple chat. We also offer "Choose Element" and "Capture Frame" tools for precise and quick editing. That said, the experience can vary a bit depending on your network speed and patience. 🤣
And the system works well for both formal production and rapid prototyping. We actually create all our social media content across platforms with iArt. Beyond regular "+ New Project" feature, our "Batch Render" is quite practical: you can pick a preferred version from the batch to remix or polish further, or ask the AI to generate entirely new takes.
We really hope you can try out our product and share your feedback with us!
The framing around 'ditching AE/CapCut' is sharp positioning — anyone who's tried to produce motion graphics professionally knows the learning curve is brutal. What I'm curious about: for creators who do short-form content (reels, product demos, explainers), how much creative control do you have over pacing and transitions? Does the AI interpret your brief or do you still guide it shot-by-shot?
iArt.ai
@theshumba Hi Melusi! Thanks for loving our positioning.
For short videos, you can set overall pacing, transitions and style directly via text. No need to guide frame by frame — just tell the AI your requirements and it will adjust accordingly.
If you have super specific ideas and want the AI to follow your instructions strictly without creative tweaks, simply state it clearly, and it will fully comply.
Occasionally preview loading issues are caused by cache. Just press Ctrl + Shift + R to hard refresh, and you’ll see the latest updates.
You can also ask the AI about its creation logic anytime in the chat panel. It will explain details from both artistic and technical perspectives. Enjoy using it!
the PRO motion graphics claim is the one worth stress testing. motion graphics that actually look professional require precise timing, easing curves, and compositional decisions that most AI video tools either ignore or handle generically. curious what the actual output looks like on something like a product launch promo versus a kinetic type animation and whether the results are production-ready or starting points that still need significant refinement
iArt.ai
@ansari_adin Hi Ansari, you hit the nail on the head — this is exactly the question we obsess over.
Sometimes it feels like the quality really starts with the prompt. If you set clear structure, tone, and context upfront, the first output is usually already production-ready for most use cases — just quick tweaks like font size or element positioning are often all you need. To give you a sense of what it can do, here's another launch video in a different visual style — it was made in under 15 minutes.
That said, AI still has its “lottery moments”, so we don’t claim perfection. Sometimes the first pass needs more refinement, but the chat loop lets you adjust those fine details without rebuilding from scratch. Even if you do want to start fresh, whether you ask the agent to redo it right in the same thread or duplicate the project to iterate freely, the heavy lifting is all on the AI — you just get to call the shots. Whether it’s a product launch promo or kinetic type animation, we’ve built the agent to handle both, and we’re constantly refining how it interprets those professional-level details.
Thanks for calling this out — it’s why we test rigorously every day! 🎬
InsForge
As someone who has spent days fighting keyframes, timeline-free animation is exactly what we need. Congrats on the launch!
iArt.ai
@jiaqichen Appreciate the love! Cheers to a future with fewer keyframe headaches. We'd love to hear your thoughts once you try it out—let us know how it compares to your usual workflow!
Does iArt rely on a set of pre-made templates that it fills, or is the layout generated entirely dynamically based on the prompt's context?
iArt.ai
@summer_tao Great question! iArt is primarily powered by dynamic generation, but we also support templates. Even better, you can explore and remix any community-created layouts from our showcase!
We are currently fast-tracking the development of a brand-new batch of premium templates to give you even more design flexibility. Stay tuned for the upcoming updates!