While building HUNCH, I noticed something interesting: the hardest scenarios aren't necessarily the ones with the most complicated scams.
They're the ones that look normal.
A familiar company. A reasonable request. A message that isn't badly written. A little urgency. Nothing immediately screams SCAM, but something just feels slightly off.
Most "how to spot a scam" content is a checklist nobody remembers in the actual moment of panic. You read it once, feel smart, then still fall for something 6 months later because real scams don't politely match the checklist.
Been building something that tries a different approach, reflex training instead of information, but genuinely curious if this community thinks awareness content actually changes behavior, or if it's mostly comfort content people consume without retaining.
HUNCH is a game that turns scam awareness into an interactive game. Instead of simply reading tips about scams, users face realistic scam scenarios and have to trust their instincts, identify suspicious behavior and choose the right action under time pressure. With progressive levels, scoring, streaks, XP and different types of scam situations, HUNCH makes learning how to spot scams engaging, practical and memorable.