General
Share and discuss tech, products, business, startups, or product recommendations
Start new thread

What makes people trust a product they have never tried?

by•

As builders, we often focus on creating features, improving design, and fixing problems.

But before someone uses a product, there is another challenge:

Trust.

People need to understand:

  • Who built this?

  • Why should they care?

  • What makes this different?

Sometimes the hardest part is not building the product, but creating enough clarity for someone to take the first step.

For other makers:

What helped you build trust with your first users?

I would love to learn from your experiences.

122 views

Add a comment

Replies

Best
I think trust comes from showing up consistently across different corners of the internet. It also depends on how crisply and clearly you explain what your product does. Consistency builds credibility. Founders often spend too much time talking about the solution, but people connect more deeply with their pain points. If you can articulate a problem so well that strangers feel understood, you've already earned a part of their trust. That's a skill every founder should build. I haven't launched my product yet, so I'm still learning. Product Hunt has taught me a lot, though I know I have a long way to go. In my opinion, a founder's reach and reputation matter just as much as the product itself—not just on Product Hunt, but across communities like LinkedIn, X, and elsewhere. An assurance that the founders cares to fix and show up for any issues possible I suppose that's where the tea is.

 I really appreciate this perspective.

I think you highlighted something very important: people don't only trust what a product does, they trust the people who are committed to solving the problem behind it.

Explaining the pain point clearly is often more powerful than explaining features, because people first want to feel understood before they look for a solution.

And I agree that consistency and showing up are part of building trust. A founder's journey is not only about launching a product, but about listening, learning, and improving with the community.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. This is exactly the kind of conversation that helps builders grow.

Trust seems to scale inversely with how much the person launching it needs it to work, for me at least. If a solo founder ships something, I barely question the "why" — I assume they hit the exact problem themselves, so I just check if it maps onto how I actually work.

It's when someone already wealthy or established launches something new that I actually pause — is this solving a real gap, or is it a hedge, an acquisition play, a way to protect a moat.

Curious how you decide which apps you actually try — what's the first thing you're checking for?

 That’s an interesting perspective, and I can relate to part of it.

For me, the first thing I look for is not the number of features—it’s whether the product solves a real problem in a simple and honest way.

Then I ask myself three questions:

  • Does it solve something I genuinely need?

  • Is its purpose clear?

  • Would I still use it a month from now?

If the answer is yes, I’m happy to give it a try, regardless of whether it was built by a solo founder or a large company. In the end, long-term value is what earns my trust.

For us it came down to two things, the founder's profile and repeating the why everywhere. Someone who builds a heavy infra product has opinions, real ones, formed the hard way, and letting those opinions be visible is what makes strangers pay attention. So the founder talks, primarily on LinkedIn, about why we are building this, what is coming that makes it matter, for us that is the agent wave, and why we are different. We say it heavily and we are not shy about it, because clarity is what lets someone take the first step, exactly like you said.

The other half is going where people are building. Talk to founders, get into the communities, understand the pain directly and offer the solution there. Trust does not come from the product page, it comes from showing up enough times with a clear answer to why you exist.

 I really appreciate you sharing this perspective.

A product is not only a set of features; it also carries the vision and reasoning of the person behind it.

Showing the "why" consistently helps people understand the intention behind the work, not just the result.

And I think being present in communities is one of the best ways to learn, because real conversations often reveal what users actually need.

Your point about the founder's voice is especially valuable. The way a builder communicates the purpose behind a product can become part of the trust itself.

Thanks again for sharing your experience. These kinds of conversations are what make communities valuable for builders.

Me personally I would look at the reviews on a product first that's a quick to learn pretty much everything u need about a product before trying it

 That's a very practical point.

Reviews often become the first conversation between a product and a potential user. They can reduce uncertainty and help people understand what to expect before trying something.

I also think the most valuable reviews are not only ratings, but the details behind them: what problem the product solved, what changed for the user, and what could be improved.

Those details help future users make better decisions.

everyone else here is right about consistency and founder voice, so i'll add the concrete one: the strongest trust signal is a claim someone can check themselves without taking your word for it.

everyone writes "we respect your privacy" on the landing page. it's free to say, so it carries almost no signal. what changed things for me was shipping something structural instead: my app has no network permission at all, so it physically can't upload your files. that's not a promise, it's a fact anyone can verify in about ten seconds.

second: be specific about what you can't do. saying "here's the part i can't prove" makes everything else more believable, especially with technical users. products that sound certain about everything read as marketing.

third, least glamorous, roopesh's point about solo founders is real but it only gets you so far: let people use it before paying. no signup wall, no card. the fastest way to trust a tool is to run it on your own stuff and watch it work.

 I really like this perspective.

I think there’s an important distinction between claiming trust and designing for trust.

When trust is built into the product itself through transparent decisions that users can verify, it becomes much more convincing than any marketing message.

I also agree with your point about being honest about limitations. A product doesn’t need to promise everything; it needs to be clear about what it does well and transparent about what it doesn’t.

Thanks for sharing such practical insights. They add a valuable dimension to this discussion.