We just launched Artifacts by Databox - turn any answer into a shareable report
https://www.producthunt.com/products/databox?launch=artifacts-by-databox
It's the end of the month. Your client needs a performance report, so you open five tools, screenshot the numbers, paste them into Google Slides, and spend two hours making it look like you didn't just paste screenshots into Google Slides.
We just made that whole process unnecessary.

Artifacts by Databox lets you turn any Genie conversation into a polished, shareable document. Ask for a report, a slide deck, or even an interactive calculator, and Genie builds it on the spot, pulling live numbers straight from your connected data. No exporting, no re-pasting, no rebuilding the same report from scratch every cycle.
Share it with a public link, no login needed for whoever's on the other end. Download it as a PDF. Or just ask Genie to turn it into a different format, and it rebuilds the whole thing for you.
A question for this community: what's the report or deck you rebuild by hand every single cycle, the one you'd love to just ask for instead?
We're in the comments all day - questions, feedback, and pushback all welcome.


Replies
i keep rebuilding the same product upadte every month. the numbers change but the structure stays almost identical.
Databox
@elidodial67la That's exactly the gap we built this for. The structure repeating every month is the part that should be automated, only the numbers should change. Curious, what's the report you rebuild most often?
i probably spend more time making reports looks presentable than actually reviewing the insights.
Databox
@_angelinaashley That's a really common one. Formatting time often outweighs analysis time, which is backwards. If you can describe what "presentable" means for your reports (brand colors, layout, tone), Genie can just build it that way from the start.
most of the effort goes into rebuilding the same slides with fresh numbers.the analysis is the valuable part not the formatting.
Databox
@anthonywrinqsb Completely agree, that's the split we designed around. Genie does the analysis and writes the narrative around the numbers, then Artifacts handles turning that into a document, so the formatting stops eating time that should go to the analysis itself.
Have you noticed any unexpected use cases beyond client reporting? I could see internal team updates and executive summaries fitting this workflow too.
Databox
@amberburch399 Yes, actually. Internal team updates and exec summaries have come up a lot, anyone who needs to hand data to someone without giving them a dashboard login. Board decks are another one we've seen early on. Client reporting is the most common use case, but the "shareable document from a prompt" part solves for any audience, not just external clients.
The two hours of pasting screenshots into Slides is a workflow I hear about constantly from the agency people I build for.
One question on the shareable report. When a client asks why a number moved, does the artifact answer that or does it come back to a person in Slack? I ask because the failure I keep hunting in my own tool is a generated summary that sounds sure about a cause it never checked. In reporting the client acts on the number, which makes it more expensive than in my case.
Databox
@vladimir_iudin Fair question, and worth being precise about. The numbers in the artifact are real, pulled directly from your connected sources, not estimated or invented. Any narrative Genie adds around them is grounded in that same data, it's not free-floating commentary.
But if the answer to "why did this move" requires context that isn't in the connected data (a campaign pause, a sales team change, something that happened outside the tool), Genie won't know that any more than a dashboard would. It can surface correlations in the data itself, but it doesn't have knowledge of things that never got recorded anywhere.
So the honest answer: the artifact is a good first pass at the "what" and often the "what changed alongside it," but for a genuinely unexplained number, a human still needs to confirm the cause before it goes to a client. We'd rather say that plainly than have someone find out the hard way.
How customizable are the generated reports? Can teams adjust the layout and branding to match what they normally send to clients?
Databox
@alicia_klein Fully customizable, and it's prompt based, no design tool needed. You can ask Genie to change colors, layout, fonts, and charts to match a client's brand or your own. Each artifact comes out on-brand by default, but nothing is locked in, you just describe the change and it rebuilds.
I like that you're sloving a workflow people deal with over and over, not just adding another AI feature . The example of rebuilding monthly reports really hit home.
Databox
@amard_sonal Appreciate that, that was the goal. Easy to add AI to an existing feature, harder to remove a task people dread doing. Rebuilding the same report every cycle felt like the clearest example of time lost to zero strategic value.
The part I would want on the artifact itself is the question. Whoever opens the link never saw the prompt, so they cannot tell whether a flat number means flat, or means the range stopped on the 20th. The person who asked knows. The person it gets forwarded to does not, and forwarding is the whole point of the feature.
The other one is what happens after you share. Live data means the report can say something different on Monday than it said when you approved it. Frozen means it goes wrong the other way. I do not think there is a right answer, but the reader cannot tell which one they are holding.
Which is it today, snapshot at share time or live?