ContentLift by YAi
Bring Fact-Checking & Quality Control to Your AI Content
Start new thread

ContentLift by YAi - Bring Fact-Checking & Quality Control to Your AI Content

by
•
AI drafts content fast, but often gets facts wrong and sounds off. ContentLift is the fact-checking and quality layer that makes AI drafts accurate, clear and on-brand - verifying sources, fixing claims and refining tone so you can publish with confidence.

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Maker

We built ContentLift™ because AI content often looks polished at first glance - but the facts, sources and claims can’t always be trusted. That’s the gap we wanted to close.

ContentLift is the fact-checking and quality control layer for AI-generated content.

It doesn’t stop at grammar or SEO like Grammarly or SEMrush.

Instead, it evaluates:

  • Factual accuracy & source credibility

  • Tone of voice

  • Clarity & readability

What makes us proud:

  • Spotting and fixing hallucinations or shaky claims instantly

  • Assessing drafts across 4 key quality areas

  • Helping teams save hours of editing and verification

We’d love to hear how you would use ContentLift in your workflow. Your feedback will help us keep improving.

Watch ContentLift in action:

 I believe this product will become a unicorn because the content of your product is really well done.

Maker

    Thank you for your feedback! We hope more people will discover ContentLift, which can help them create better content

   Absolutely! The content quality problem is only getting worse as more teams rely on AI for everything. Tools like ContentLift that actually verify claims instead of just fixing grammar are going to be essential.

Looking forward to seeing how you guys evolve the product based on user feedback.

Hunter

 such an important tool for ai content

Maker

Thanks  for supporting us today!

Maker

We built ContentLift™ because we’ve all had that moment with AI content where you think:

“Looks good… but would I really hit publish on this?” 🤔

That’s exactly the problem we wanted to solve.

ContentLift isn’t about fixing commas or chasing keywords. Tools like Grammarly or SEMrush already do a great job there.

We focused on what really matters when you’re about to share something with the world:

  • Are the facts solid and sources credible?

  • Does it sound right?

  • Is it clear and actually enjoyable to read?

What makes me proud is seeing it flag shaky claims before they slip through, and give teams back hours they’d usually spend on searching for sources or just editing.

For us, this isn’t just about polishing text - it’s about building trust in what you publish.

I’d love to hear how you’d use ContentLift in your workflow. Your feedback will help us keep shaping it into something truly useful for you!

 kudos on solving this problem - looking forward to trying it out!

Maker

 You know better than anyone how tough it is to build a truly reliable AI agent, so your support means a lot. Thanks for backing us!

AI hallucinations are hard to avoid, so cross-validating what the AI ​​generates is important, but it’s also a waste of time. So glad ContentLift coming! I believe many people will use it!

🚀 Super impressed by ContentLift – finally, a tool that brings structure and intelligence to content planning using AI! As a product manager constantly juggling strategy, execution, and stakeholder comms, this is exactly the kind of leverage I look for.

Love the clean UI, actionable insights, and the way it aligns content with real user intent. Big congrats to the team on a strong launch, this has real product-market fit vibes. 🔥

Worth keeping an eye on this one – it’s solving a real pain point. 🙌

#AI #ContentStrategy #ProductivityTools

Maker

 Thank you so much 🙌 that means a lot, especially coming from someone who lives the product management juggle every day. Would love to hear how you’d slot it into your workflow. Your perspective could really help us sharpen where we go next!

Looks extremely helpful, we’ll definitely try it!

Maker

Thank you ! Would love to hear feedback form you, an experienced Maker!

I have been following the Yai team for a long time and am delighted with their progress. Congrats on the launch!

I have a question about ContentLift. The website says that it simplifies overly complex sentences. However, I've noticed that AI-generated sentences are typically very simple and concise. Is it possible to humanise the text rather than simplify it?

Maker

Hey , thank you for a great comment and question.

Great observation, indeed, some LLMs use concise, simple sentences.

In ContentLIft you can choose complexity of your wording, this will affect sentence structure. 'Humanisation' is another metric we're working on, to introduce it in to our solution, watch this space.

Curious to see what you'll think about the existing metrics. Drop us a review when you can:

 By the way, as an existing Yai user, I cannot sign up for the ContentLift 7-day trial. the platform immediately redirects me to Stripe.

Maker

Hey, there's a free 7-day trial available for all, it is accessible once a user added their card details. You won't be charged until the trial expires.

P.S. We also have a great offer on at the moment - you get 6 months for the price of 1 month (ÂŁ58 total).

This is brilliant timing! Just had a nightmare situation last week where our AI-generated case study claimed a client had '300% revenue growth' when it was actually 30%. Thankfully caught it before it went live, but man...

curious about your verification process for numerical claims specifically? Numbers are where AI seems to go completely off the rails. Does ContentLift cross-reference against actual data sources or is it more about flagging suspicious-looking claims?

Been following your launch today and the traction looks insane. Well-deserved - this solves a problem every content team has but nobody talks about!

Maker

 Wow, that’s the perfect example of why a second pair of eyes is so critical. Glad you caught it in time!

That’s exactly what ContentLift is built to do! It flags all claims involving numbers, names, locations, quotes, etc., and then runs a deeper search to surface supporting (or contradictory) evidence. The idea is to make those “300% vs 30%” slip-ups almost impossible to miss.

Thank you so much for your support!

 The automated flagging of specific claim types sounds solid. Numbers and quotes are definitely where most errors slip through - it's those precise details that make or break credibility.

Curious how the evidence surfacing works in practice. Does it pull from multiple sources or focus on authoritative ones? We've had issues where AI finds 'supporting' evidence that's actually from unreliable blogs or outdated articles.

Maker

That's a great question! Indeed, checking the reliability and credibility of sources is as important as search functionality itself. We are ranking sources based on credibility (e.g. or The New York Times would have the highest score, when personal blogs would have a low score). We are still building the database of sources with ranking to improve trust... Another verification mechanism is that we check the date of the publication to understand how outdated the content is and deprioritise it if the publication was done a long time ago. Just a few examples of how our validation/verification mechanism works.

Congrats on the launch. Having tried the product, I especially appreciated the source verification feature. It's still unnerving that loads of AI completely make up claims, and support these with links that do no exist.

Maker

 thanks for your support! Great to hear you liked the source verification feature. Indeed, the credibility of the information is the most urgent gap in content creation nowadays. ContentLift can help with that now!

Good luck

Maker

 Thank you for supporting us!

Great idea for a product and well put together! Definitely worth using.

Maker

 Thank you! 🙏 Means a lot to hear that. Can’t wait for you to give it a spin. Would love to hear your experience once you’ve tried it out.

12
Next