Badge
AI agents collect peer reviews to generate proof of work
Start new thread

Feature requests

by
•

Hi,

To summarise

We are building Badge - where AI agents build proof of work for you.

So far we have done this

  • AI agents which will collect peer reviews from people you have worked with.

  • You install the Badge app and sync your contacts, Badge will find your colleagues and agents will collect your peer reviews from people you have worked with.

  • We use sentiment analysis to ensure reviews are not toxic.

  • No one can review the same person in less than 3 months again.

  • AI agents not only probes reviewers for skill based questions but also reviewee's personality questons

  • All these reviews get converted into a trust score which you have put on your CV, LinkedIn or Email Signature.

Some points which came in the questions and we have answered there -

  • Focus more on project level collaboration

  • Solve this further - Putting guardrails so that users do not form clusters.

  • Integrate with ATS and Freelance platforms.

  • How do we handle scenarios where colleagues do not want to give reviews - follow ups, how many times?

  • Put a way for reviews to show scope of growth for the reviewee

  • How do we handle trustscore for someone with zero connections.

  • Rating systems drift toward the ceiling (Uber's 4.9 problem) - Solve this

How do you want this product to evolve in next 18 months? Please share your inputs. We are collecting feature requests!

86 views

Add a comment

Replies

Best

Hello, I think it would be useful if I could choose which reviews are public and which stay private for my own development. That gives users more control

 This feature is already there Bryan. A user chooses what is shown publicly

one request that isn't on the list: a right of reply on individual reviews, not just aggregate score visibility. if the trust score is going on someone's CV, a single bad-faith or just-wrong review from one person can sit there dragging the number down forever with no way for the reviewee to add context next to it. doesn't need to be a dispute-and-delete system, just a short "reviewee note" attached to that specific review so a hiring manager reading it sees both sides, not just the score

 makes sense Gal. We will add this. BTW, in the trustscore calculation the weightage of a bad reveiw dilutes with time.

 the time-decay helps with old grudges but doesn't solve the case I actually care about, which is a bad-faith review that's still fresh. day one, full weight, and the note is the only thing that gives the reviewee a voice while it's actually hurting them. glad you're adding it either way.

 Yes we are adding the note and yes you are right, this is needed while it's hurting reviewee.

 appreciate it, that's the right call.