How should teams audit AI agents before they act?

byโ€ข

AI agents are moving from chat to action โ€” sending emails, posting to Slack, sharing files, updating records. The problem: once an agent can act, you can't ship it without answering three questions โ€” what's it allowed to do, what did it actually do, and can you prove the log wasn't edited?

AgentBlackBox is the governance and accountability control plane for AI agents โ€” approvals, policies, audit evidence, identity lifecycle, and compliance in one system.

๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ Policy gate on every action โ€” allow / redact / require-approval / deny. Default-deny, fail-closed.

โœ‹ Human-in-the-loop approvals with segregation of duties (you can't approve your own action).

๐Ÿค– Agent identity & governed tools โ€” register agents, scope their tools, ordered activity timelines.

๐Ÿ”— No-bypass connector control for Slack, Gmail, Drive, GitHub, Notion โ€” credentials stay vaulted (optional setup).

๐Ÿงพ Tamper-evident audit โ€” hash-chained events โ†’ signed checkpoints โ†’ optional Bitcoin anchoring. Independently verifiable, with signed exports.

๐Ÿชช Enterprise-ready โ€” SSO, SCIM provisioning, tenant isolation, RBAC, retention, legal hold, DSAR, SIEM integration (optional configuration; SSO enforcement & SIEM streaming off by default).

๐ŸŸข Safe by default โ€” off until you opt in; rolls out shadow โ†’ enforce, reversibly.

It's multi-tenant, role-based, and API-first โ€” a production SaaS, with every guarantee covered by an automated verification suite.

2 views

Add a comment

Replies

Be the first to comment