How should teams audit AI agents before they act?
AI agents are moving from chat to action โ sending emails, posting to Slack, sharing files, updating records. The problem: once an agent can act, you can't ship it without answering three questions โ what's it allowed to do, what did it actually do, and can you prove the log wasn't edited?
AgentBlackBox is the governance and accountability control plane for AI agents โ approvals, policies, audit evidence, identity lifecycle, and compliance in one system.
๐ก๏ธ Policy gate on every action โ allow / redact / require-approval / deny. Default-deny, fail-closed.
โ Human-in-the-loop approvals with segregation of duties (you can't approve your own action).
๐ค Agent identity & governed tools โ register agents, scope their tools, ordered activity timelines.
๐ No-bypass connector control for Slack, Gmail, Drive, GitHub, Notion โ credentials stay vaulted (optional setup).
๐งพ Tamper-evident audit โ hash-chained events โ signed checkpoints โ optional Bitcoin anchoring. Independently verifiable, with signed exports.
๐ชช Enterprise-ready โ SSO, SCIM provisioning, tenant isolation, RBAC, retention, legal hold, DSAR, SIEM integration (optional configuration; SSO enforcement & SIEM streaming off by default).
๐ข Safe by default โ off until you opt in; rolls out shadow โ enforce, reversibly.
It's multi-tenant, role-based, and API-first โ a production SaaS, with every guarantee covered by an automated verification suite.
Replies