1mbsite - Create and share a website under 1 megabyte with the world

So many congrats for the launch! This product has a lot of potential to be big - as a great prototyping tool and static hosting API for developers. Great work Dalton! ✨🥞

custom domains supported or only ending with .1mb.site? :)

It’s so exciting to know that 1MB is about to be featured. That honestly means so much to me 😄 I’ve been working on this project for a little less than a month and thought I’d share it with you all.

OMG now websites have a 1 megabite limit too!? What about second layer solutions? #FML

This is really interesting! I like the focus on getting things live and hosted. I also appreciate the emphasis on the size, for those of us aiming to cater some of our content to those who may have restrictive internet connectivity. If I was interested in doing more editing on my machine and deploying (although I love the browser editing functionality), I'm guessing the repo for the CLI is here: https://github.com/1MB-Site/depl... Where should I go for documentation around properly using your command line interface? Thanks again!

If my website serves ~280kb but then preloads ~4mb of next-to-visit pages via a service worker, is it cheating? :D

let’s be honest! this thing is amazing! love this project already and about to make a mini site about my contacts , will help out a ton! keep going!

Totally loved it 😍😍. I think 1MB is more than sufficient to build a minimalistic landing page , thanks for this product.

I appreciate the concept about ease of deployment, getting things up, and using small sizes for the site. Definitely will be watching this going forward.

Pros:

Easy to understand and use out of the box, very lightweight

Cons:

This may be early stages, developer documentation appears to be somewhat light

I have been testing this product our for a while and overall it is fine, although I have noticed some things that bothered or upset me.

1. The editing process is not intuitive.

2. The documentation is incredibly lacking in well, documentation.

3. Sites have been banned without warning nor a written policy.

4. Rankings are extremely unfair.

5. Passwords cannot be changed

6. Downtime is incredibly high without any notice during maintaince.

7. Code editor is done by a third party which has buggy and poorly built code.

8. One megabyte of storage is too limiting, expecially if you are competing with services like Glitch.

9. Security is very low.

10. You can get banned just for "upseting" the administrator.

Pros:

1. Responsive administrator.

Cons:

1. You can only have one file, and it must be a "index.html".

2. Dynamic sites aren't possible.

3. Miner was implemented on all sites.