... steps. (...) To handle longer running tasks, Composer 1.5 has the ability to self-summarize. This allows the model to continue exploring for a solution even when it runs out of available context. In a previous thread, Claude's (Opus, Sonnet) and Google's (Gemini) coding models were leading the way. [2] Curious if this new release would attract more developers. Any experiences with Composer 1.5? [1]: Introducing Composer 1.5 [2]: What's the best AI model for coding? Comment from ... ... JohannKrugell(@johannkrugell): I tried Composer 1.5 yesterday. It was slower than Sonnet

... amongst this community of builders. I ll kick off with an experience that had us scratching our heads for months last year Our product, @Tonkotsu , runs a bunch of coding agents in parallel. They re built on top of Sonnet 4.5 and do coding tasks by repeatedly calling tools to read and write code. We review task failures daily and started noticing something strange: some sessions would devolve into an infinite loop of Sonnet

... project I'm building. Here's what I've learned: Context management is everything. The "best" model really depends on your use case: - Complex refactoring? Opus 4.5 hands down. Worth the cost when you need deep reasoning. - Quick iterations/prototyping? Sonnet 4.5 hits the sweet spot - fast enough to stay in flow, smart enough to handle most tasks. - Frontend/UI work? Gemini Pro surprised me with speed and quality. The real game-changer isn't just the model though ... ... made for spending more time figuring out what you're actually trying to do before you code). Anyhoo, my two cents... Comment from Rajat Jain(@rajatxr): Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking) 32K ? Comment from Zypressen(@zypressen): I lean toward Sonnet

... migration script reference. Any idea how to fix this? I assume that vibecoding is an experience everyone can enjoy but comes with frustrations about asking the right questions, or being very specific about my requests. I am using Claude Sonnet 4, 4.5 and 4.5 thinking. Are these the best coding ai models for Typescript? Comment from David Murray(@irfan_hydar): I've been there. Direct Supabase SQL is tempting but it bites later. I fixed it by squashing migrations ... ... aligning Windsurf with the latest schema. Sonnet

... generating a playable "Minecraft" replica demo cost less than 0.2 RMB using this model. Performance Benchmark: In major programming evaluation sets, Doubao-Seed-Code s overall performance is reported to be only second to the current top model, Claude Sonnet 4.5 , outperforming several other prominent domestic models. Massive Context: It features a native 256K context window , which is larger than Claude Sonnet

... shipping Let s crowd-source the best combos for 2025 . Who knows, maybe we ll spot the next trend before it blows up. Comment from Paul Tseluyko(@paultseluyko): I actually prefer Claude code or GPT Copilot extension for VSCode more than Cursor. I don't understand the hype around Cursor, why is it better than just having an extension? Comment from Olivia Wood(@oliviachapmanwood): @jumkye  how did you build in the ai integration? did you use lovable ... ... plethora of tools to compile data and graphics, but my go to set is: ChatGPT for brainstorming process, concepts and copy Perplexity for RnD MidJourney/Higgsfield for content creation Replit for the build Comment from Rico(@ricoboost): Claude code + vs

... just launched AllPub.co and built pretty much the entire thing using Vibecoding with Claude Sonnet 3.5 . I'm a software architect with just some basic Python knowledge, so this was my first full web app build. Wanted to share my experience! What I Built AllPub.co is a tool that lets you write once in your favourite platform or Notion and automatically publish to Dev.to and Hashnode. I'm currently exploring more integrations like Medium, LinkedIn, and others based on what ... ... people actually want. No more copy-pasting and reformatting the same article three times. Why Claude Sonnet

... using both is the best way, Claude in Cursors Terminal brings me the code stability and I'm using it when deploys are failing or authentication , serious stuff. For new features im using cursors ai, mostly claude sonnet 4 max , Opus 4 is better but it costs far too much... Comment from Alexander Gorny(@alexandergorny): @pedro_marchal  100% agree Comment from Aaron O'Leary(@aaronoleary): @timsu  Interesting! What is it about Claude Code that makes more effective ... ... model I use (max mode only too). I usually opt for Codex first then Claude Code as a backup Comment from Daniel Bernasconi(@daniel_bernasconi): @chrismessina  have you tried Claude Code? Do you think Warp is a valid alternative

... around an IDE. Looking forward to hearing everyone's thoughts! Comment from Andr J(@conduit_design): @gabe  The gemini cli github account is getting pounded RN https://github.com/google-gemini... . Classic "SEFO" "ship early and find out" As an alternative if the gemini connection is flaky because of high traffic / early bugs etc. Then there is also Cline with Grok 3. Its pretty good actually. Also free for now (requires a very painless 1-click singup with GitHub on Clines ... ... writing them into proper code. One of my colleagues suggested trying @Cursor . We used it for some time and I must say, it s one of the best AI-powered code editors. Personally, I feel it is better than VS

... Anthropic just released two new models for Claude 4: Opus 4 and Sonnet 4 . Let's find out how good they are. What are you using it for? What s impressed you? What s broken? How does it compare to GPT-4, Gemini, and others? Drop your thoughts, screenshots, prompts, use cases below. Let s trade notes while it s hot Comment from Andr J(@conduit_design): @jean_willame   @steveb  Cline gets everything day 1. No waiting Comment ... ... powered by Claude 4: "Build a fully functional Tetris game with clean UI, basic controls, score display, and level tracking." and the result was a highly playable Tetris game , right out of the box. And for the pricing, Sonnet

... Polite AI is excited to announce the integration of Anthropic s latest AI models, Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4. These models are designed to enhance coding, reasoning, and agentic capabilities. Key Features: Claude Opus 4: Anthropic s most advanced model, capable of sustained performance on complex, long-running tasks and agent workflows. Claude Sonnet

... Similar to @Claude by Anthropic Code and @Codex by OpenAI @Windsurf has announced SWE-1, its first family of software engineering models : SWE-1 : Approximately Claude 3.5 Sonnet levels of tool-call reasoning while being cheaper to serve. It will be available to all paid users for a promotional period of 0 credits per user prompt. SWE-1-lite : A smaller model that replaces Cascade Base at better quality. It is available for unlimited use to all users, free ... ... therefore suggest much more relevant and contextual next steps. Sound interesting? Sign up here! Comment from Ron Hessing(@ron_hessing): Yes, I wondered the same. Statistically it does not seem to come out much different than Claude 3.7 Sonnet

... really bad coding assistant. I used it when the task was straight forward and simple (because it was free), but for anything that was complex or might touch more than one file, I fell back on Sonnet. I found Sonnet

... collaborative and productive environment. It offers participants the freedom to move around the meeting space (designed as various maps, some inspired by games and some based off of actual office blueprints). Nonilion is a distraction free google s meet alternative, with perplexity ai, multi participant screen share, interactive multi participant games, file sharing, custom characters and more. Nonilion is free to use for all the users and also offers a pro plan for meetings that required custom room names ... ... writers, video editors and front-end developers to focus and work in collaboration. Two or more groups talking over each other or sharing screens at the same time resulted in other groups to sit and just watch. As an alternative

... Raycast keeps adding new models every week . I use @Anthropic 's Claude 3.7 Sonnet when coding and @OpenAI 's o3-mini when speed matters. Curious what works best for the community. Over to you! What model are you using and why? Edit 2025-07-30 : Raycast just introduced Auto Models. "Let AI choose the best model for the job at hand." Join the discussion here  Comment from fmerian(@fmerian): @yossefaymanzedan  definitely have to give Grok ... ... minute or two. For real-time information or fast web-based insights, I rely on Perplexity. Each model plays a specific role in my workflow depending on the task and requirements. Comment from Timo Bechtel(@timobechtel): Basically use Sonnet

... Codebase Bolt works well initially but can struggle as your codebase grows beyond roughly 100-200 prompts. Keeping your components short (under 300 lines each) helps manage complexity and Bolt's understanding of your code. Bolt uses the Claude Sonnet 3.7 model, which tends to be overly creative, suggesting unnecessarily complex solutions. Explicitly instruct Bolt, "I value simplicity and prefer straightforward implementations," to guide it towards simpler, practical solutions. Giving Bolt ambiguous prompts with multiple possible implementations often results ... ... fairly loaded topic. Analytics & Building Your Own Admin Tools Easily integrate Google Analytics by simply inputting your measurement ID into Bolt for basic user insights. Remember to ask it to track key events across your application. Alternatively

... narrowed to the controller directory and finished in about 5 minutes. In sum, I don't like AI touching my code though I do enjoy the answers it gives me outside my project. The experience above was using Claude Sonnet-3.5. Comment from Ajin Sunny(@ajinsunny): Nothing so far for me, if you are on the 3.7 Max Sonnet

... build becomes. I think the math here is in favour of spending here. Its like you dont use a macbook air from 2011 when there is mac studio with 32x cpus. that can build your proejcts in seconds vs hours for the macbook air. Its a bit perplexing to me why there isnt pay as you go options for cursor and windsurf etc. Or more premium subscriptions for that matter. Most business would easily pay $500+ to supercharge their ... ... teams and save a lot of time and headcount. Comment from Andr J(@conduit_design): Yepp. Using Cloude Sonnet

... Just a thought on Cursor and the fact that Anthropic rate limiting basically doesn't let me do anything right now. I've been developing with Cursor and Claude-3.5-Sonnet (recently 3.7-thinking) for last few months now. I've gotten to a point where I realized 1 hour of no-Cursor coding can be done in 10 minutes or less using Cursor agent. It's absolutely amazing, let me just say that. But because of the issues with ... ... Anthropic's endpoint, I was forced to try out gpt-4o, and other models. But nothing beats Claude-3.5(7)-Sonnet

... editor journey has been: 1. Tried out Github copilot in VS Code. Loved it. 2. Then tried out @Cursor after @bernatfortet kept talking about it. Immediately switch to Cursor. 3. Then tried out @Windsurf after @lagap discovered it. Immediately fell in love and switched. Anecdotally, everyone is talking about Cursor. And no one is really talking about Windsurf. On Product Hunt, Cursor has 845 Shoutouts. Windsurf has two? In my experience, Windsurf is the leader at the moment with ... ... Because it's stable, they listen to feedback, and have unlimited premium prompts on a subscription. Comment from Jo o Ferreira(@linklogician): Initially tried @Cursor , but ended up building most of my latest tool with @Windsurf . Started using Claude 3.5 Sonnet