... week until Nixplora launches. I want to explain why the architecture looks the way it does. Most validation tools are a single black box: you describe your idea, and they return a score. The problem isn't the score it's that you don't know which parts of the answer are facts and which parts the model just made up. We learned this the hard way, building in Latin America, where wrong market assumptions have real consequences ... ... split the problem into 4 separate agents, each accountable for a different kind of reasoning: Scout Searches for real market signals: search trends, forum conversations, recent regulation, competitor

... Product Hunt I'm Ricardo or Richi for my friends, and I'm launching Nixplora next Tuesday, April 28. Here's the honest version of why I built it. Most startup validation tools were designed in Silicon Valley, for Silicon Valley. They assume you have access to clean market data, that your benchmarks come from the US, and that your competitive landscape looks like TechCrunch. That works great if you're building in San Francisco. It doesn't work ... ... building in Santiago, Bogot , or Mexico City where market data is fragmented, currency fluctuates, regulation changes faster, and the cost of getting it wrong is much higher because there's less capital to absorb the mistake. So I built Nixplora