... through what LangChain and goose each broke trying the obvious thing first, and two tests verified by mutation. Reviewing that was a genuine pleasure. Housekeeping CI is green again. Rust 1.98 landed on 20 August with a new clippy lint, we build with -D warnings and a floating stable toolchain, and the build went red on its own no commit required. The modified UTF-7 decoder for IMAP folder names now uses as_chunks, which also retires a hand-rolled ...

... called Symfony and I wrote a very detailed claude[.]md file. Then I built each feature one at a time to keep the context window as small as possible. Then I manually tested the feature, ran a security scan, linted, then pushed to git. Then moved on to the next feature. Claude Code performed extremely well with this workflow and tight constraints. I think using an existing framework that is modular and scalable with the workflow I described, should make ...

... change tells it to avoid something, a path tells it where the button component actually is, and that is what stops it building a second one. The rules I trust are the ones a machine checks. We have lint rules for the code style ones and a test that fails when a pattern we deleted comes back, so CI corrects the agent even when nobody remembered the rule. That covers maybe 50%+ your list though. Spacing, empty states and button ... ... that only exists in my prompt is easy to lose, whereas putting the rule where every session can see it gives the project some actual memory. And I agree about machine-enforced rules. The things we can turn into linting

... makes it unique: 1-Click Terraform Exporter (telliac export): Converts plain English into valid Terraform HCL anytime with zero vendor lock-in. FinOps Cost Estimator (telliac cost): Shows exact monthly spend breakdown in USD before deploying. Security Linter (telliac lint): Scans for open security groups and exposed secrets automatically. Standalone Binaries: Pre-compiled executables for Windows and Linux zero Python needed. Live Browser Playground: https://telliac.pages.dev Public Downloads: https://github.com/HARSHALJETHWA ... I would love to answer any questions and hear ...

... would've meant another round of comment - fix - push. But there were also times it gave generic "best practice" suggestions that didn't fit our team's actual conventions, so I had to filter through what to actually apply versus ignore. Not always a time-saver either, for small PRs, the lead's review still came back basically unchanged after I'd already run it through Claude, so that step felt redundant. The benefit was clearer on PRs with more ... ... code review is like asking a very confident junior developer to check your work: great at spotting missed null cases, but occasionally determined to refactor the entire architecture because it read a blog post Useful as an extra lint

... service worker for startup crashes, and captures uncaught exceptions and blank renders. Any real runtime failure is fed back into a self-healing loop that repairs it automatically before delivery so the verification is behavioral, not just "does it lint." Comment from Saurabh Dey(@saurabh_dey1): @jason_scott8   Right now editing works on extensions you build (or fork) inside PlugThis you can keep iterating in plain English with full version history. Importing an existing external extension to edit ...

... made them succeed or fail? For those who've sold into small/mid-sized businesses, what's usually the biggest blocker to adoption price, integration effort, or something else? Is there a feature here that seems like a "nice to have" versus something that would actually change behavior? Would appreciate any perspective, whether from experience building similar things or just as someone who's dealt with this as a customer or business owner. Comment from Tommy Kang(@sjtkang): What I'm building ... ... help for query writing and exploration, or is the bigger value in giving external agents safe, controlled access to their Postgres data? Comment from Ognjen Adzic(@ognjenadzic28): @nolan_vu  I like that way of thinking about it. "Irreversible vs

... Something I built led to a design decision I want to get feedback on. LineageLens is a free VS Code extension that captures every AI code insertion and scores it for risk on a 0 100 scale. Works with Cursor, Copilot, ClaudeCode, Gemini CLI. Zero config on install just start using your AI tools and your insertions start showing up in the sidebar. The scoring is deterministic rules: +28 for credential-like material, +24 for eval/exec patterns, +22 for subprocess ... ... This solves a problem I didn't realize I had until I read this. We've been using AI-generated code in production for months and honestly have no clear picture of which parts were written by AI vs

... sits between you and your AI tool and swaps improvising for constraints: You describe the project in a forced brief. It builds a real design system: type, color, layout, motion. It generates the code against that system. It lints the result against 152 rules and blocks the generic version before it ships. The part people argue with: it never calls an LLM. Pure Python, offline, deterministic. Same brief in, same system out. A model improvising is what makes the slop ... ... took the model out of the decision and wrote the taste down as rules you can read and switch off. There's a real before/after in the repo: a skip-hire site, generic template versus

... doorbell. It rings the same whether it's a package or a fire. That's basically the gap Pushary fills, same hook idea you've already wired, but the event carries a real handoff (done vs blocked vs

... Real question for anyone running coding agents daily. I started counting how often Claude Code and Codex ask for permission during a typical session. It's around 100 prompts per hour. Read file? Yes. Run test? Yes. Lint? Yes. git push --force? Also yes if you're zoned out. The industry gives you two modes right now: 1. Approve everything manually. Safe, but you're handcuffed to the terminal. 2. Skip all permissions. Fast, until rm -rf ./src happens ...

... important There's also a vhs smoke harness under tapes/ that scripts the canonical user flows same scenarios I used to walk through manually before every release, now reproducible with make tapes . And a CI workflow runs build / test / lint on every push, so regressions don't sneak through to a tag. None of this you see as a user, but every future release lands faster and safer because of it. Upgrade brew upgrade gfazioli/tap/octoscope Or grab a binary from ...

... According to the 2025 @Stack Overflow Developer Survey (49,000+ participants), @VS Code still is the most-used dev environment, maintaining the top spot thanks to its marketplace. @Kilo Code , @Github Copilot , @Ultracite ... What are the extensions that significantly improve your coding workflow? Comment from fmerian(@fmerian): @viorelmocanu  great list! Comment from fmerian(@fmerian): @nathan044  any extensions in particular you'd recommend? Comment from fmerian(@fmerian): @jonabiola  what do you enjoy the most with @Github Copilot ? anything ... ... they could improve? Comment from Alex(@nathan044): The comment is already solid, I ve just adjusted it and naturally included one of your anchor texts: Interesting results VS

... discovers your entries from resources/assets/. Drop a .tsx file, webpack picks it up. That s it. Every plugin now speaks the same 5 commands: yarn dev # watch mode yarn build # production build yarn test # Jest yarn format # Prettier yarn lint # ESLint (WP preset) TypeScript, Jest, Prettier all configured out of the box. No opt-in, no separate setup. Strict TS, @wordpress/* presets, everything wired and ready. One-command migration from v1: composer require wpbones/wpbones:^2.0.1 php bones migrate ...

... ai coding agents were driving me crazy. same mistakes over and over, switching models and rewriting prompts didn't help ...

... Dockerfiles, setting up CI/CD workflows, adding licenses/.env examples... you know the drill. So I built Repo Forge a dead-simple tool that generates clean, production-ready GitHub repositories in under 2 minutes . Pick your stack toggle options (CI/CD, Docker, linting, etc.) get a structured repo with: Best-practice folder layout Tailored .gitignore + .env.example Professional README template GitHub Actions CI/CD workflow Dockerfile + docker-compose (where it makes sense) MIT license ready to go Current stacks (free to generate ZIPs): React + Vite ...

... widely seen as the best. And Sonnet is definitely a high-quality model. BUT if you re building a SaaS product powered by AI, pricing is important. It directly impacts margins, scalability, and how competitive you can be. If alternatives are only a few percent behind at 3 7x lower cost (+ you can train them to achieve better quality), that gap is hard to ignore. If there is a way to bring Sonnet closer to Haiku pricing, that ... ... found that the cost difference between models on the same task can be huge. Using aicosts.ai to track per-model cost per task type helped us route work intelligently. Sonnet for complex refactoring, a cheaper model for tests and linting

... than human code. We're basically speedrunning to incidents and calling it productivity. Professional review tools cost $15-50/month. That's rent money for some of us. Security shouldn't be paywalled. What makes it different: Not just linting. It catches the stuff that makes you wake up to 47 Slack messages. Exposed secrets, injection vulns, broken auth, sketchy API calls. The vibe: Already scanned 50+ repos. Found critical issues in 68% of AI-assisted code. Average scan takes ...

... This is where the story changes. Imagine pushing that same commit on Friday at 4:30 PM. But this time, you don t ping Slack. You just wait 30 seconds. Our AI agent wakes up. It doesn't just "lint" your code; it reads it like a senior engineer. It scans the diff. It realizes you changed the User schema. It checks the database migration files to make sure they match. It notices you forgot to update the API documentation ...

... because people don t care. Because attention is limited. When reviewers are exhausted, they miss context, skim changes, and default to approval. PRFlow was built to remove the noise before humans step in, lint-level issues, obvious mistakes, missing basics. It doesn t replace reviewers. It protects their focus. If you want to try it on real PRs, here is the link : https://www.graphbit.ai/prflow Comment from Karishma Yadav(@karishma_yadav3): This really resonates with me. I don't miss ...

... stack with GPT-5 Codex in under a month sounds like a huge productivity leap. Curious how you re handling testing and deployment with it. Comment from mina(@minach): @ricoboost  Nice stack .Simple, fast, and proven. Claude + VS Code fits great with it Comment from mina(@minach): @jochen_zehe  Totally agree with this. I used to obsess over the tech stack too , comparing frameworks, tools, versions... and in the end, the biggest bottleneck was me not shipping anything ... ... from the start, not added later. But both setups work great. Comment from mina(@minach): @raycast   @chrismessina  Interesting . Windsurf + Warp seems perfect for Raycast work. I m curious, what s your favorite part of building extensions versus

... simple CI/CD pipeline connecting all of them together, and created an entry in the form of cursor as the only open window to code and kick start deployment. Yes, you make a code commit. -> it gets verified -> Lint guards -> remote branch -> run automation scripts -> deployment. We are having a lot of fun, making something and making it live. For Beta. It's that feeling of power is ultimately what drives us. And frankly I never ... ... rapid prototyping getting that 'vibe' and UI right in minutes. However, the 'no-BS' take is that you still need a dev's eye. I use it for 80% of the heavy lifting, but I still jump into VS

... part matters more than whether the agent sits in the IDE or terminal. Comment from Solal Zanovello(@solal_aegis): As a developer building a high-performance no_std Rust kernel (Aegis Omni-Core) , I ve found that the "Terminal vs IDE" choice really depends on the complexity of the abstraction layer. For 9.4 GB/s FHE logic , I m team Terminal (Claude Code) for the "Thinking" phase. When you re dealing with manual memory alignment and SIMD intrinsics, you need ... ... register allocation issue, having the AI right there in the editor to suggest quick syntax fixes is unbeatable. My hybrid workflow: Terminal for structural planning and complex refactoring (where IDE agents often hallucinate the context). IDE for real-time linting

... merge or not (if you want to throw an experiment) Use git worktrees if you want to work on multiple tasks in parallel - more advanced, I do not use this Use Claude.me to document your software workflow, code formatting, linting standards, etc. Ask Claude to follow Claude.md when tackling tasks - Claude Code can access GitHub issues, manage branches, etc. With enough clarity, if you feel the project has many remnants of experiments, do no hesitate to restart parts ...

... Launched on Product Hunt last week , @Ultracite , an opinionated code formatting and linting tool, just hit 1,000 stars on GitHub . The Product Hunt effect? S/O to maker @haydenbleasel for the continuous great work Leave a star on GitHub Curious if the community has any pro tips and best practices for growing an open-source project? Comment from Olga Shiryaeva(@olga_builds): Congratulations on hitting 1,000 stars! Comment from Frank(@frank_ai2025): wow! congrats for the achievement ...