Launching today
Termi Protocol
Watch your AI coding agents build, live in 3D
55 followers
Watch your AI coding agents build, live in 3D
55 followers
The Termi Protocol is a 3D simulation of AI agent workflows. Give your coding agents a face, a desk and a living room. Watch them read, write and run commands live in 3D, like a game. You run the agents; we visualize the process.
Products used by Termi Protocol
Explore the tech stack and tools that power Termi Protocol. See what products Termi Protocol uses for development, design, marketing, analytics, and more.
Productivity 1
Productivity 1
Electron FiddleCreate, run, package, and share experiments with Electron.
5.0 (5 reviews)
Electron Fiddle was a very useful tool for building and testing the desktop side of my project.
I already had a website, and with Electron I was able to bring that existing web experience into a real desktop application for both macOS and Windows. It made the process of experimenting, running, packaging, and testing much easier.
What mattered most was that Electron helped me turn the web-based product into a cross-platform desktop app without rebuilding everything from scratch. I could test ideas quickly, check how the app behaved, and move faster while preparing the desktop version.
Overall, I chose Electron Fiddle because it helped me create, test, and package desktop experiments quickly, especially while building for macOS and Windows.
Design & Creative 1
Design & Creative 1
Three.jsWebGL made easy
5.0 (26 reviews)
Three.js was a key part of the project because it helped me create a 3D character, build a 3D environment, and add animations from scratch.
It gave me the flexibility to design a more alive and interactive experience directly inside the web and desktop app. Instead of keeping the product as a flat interface, Three.js helped me give the project a stronger visual identity and a more emotional feeling.
What mattered most was that I could build the character, the room, the movements, and the scene structure in a way that matched the product idea. This made the experience feel more like a living system, not just a standard software interface.
Overall, I chose Three.js because it helped me bring personality, depth, and life into my website and applications through 3D architecture, animation, and interactive visual design.
Ecommerce 1
Ecommerce 1
PolarOpen source monetization platform for developers
5.0 (35 reviews)
Polar stood out because it made monetization much easier and faster compared to the alternatives I tried.
The profile approval process was very fast, and since it uses Stripe infrastructure, it felt reliable from the beginning. My company is a limited company, and the approval process was completed smoothly without the long waiting times or complicated back-and-forth I experienced with other platforms.
What mattered most was how simple and developer-friendly the whole experience was. The interface was clean, the website and product management were easy to understand, and adding products was very straightforward. I did not have to fight with the platform just to set up payments.
Polar also worked really well with coding agents. Because the platform structure, payment flow, backend communication, and product setup were clear, I was able to move faster and implement everything more accurately with agent support.
For me, Polar felt like the least exhausting option. It handled the important parts of monetization, payment setup, product management, and backend integration in a complete and simple way.
Engineering & Development 4
Engineering & Development 4
Codex 3.0 by OpenAICodex can now build, test & debug on autopilot
5.0 (39 reviews)
Codex was especially useful when I needed a faster coding partner to continue the work while Claude Code was taking longer to respond.
Claude Code helped me with the deeper architecture, planning, and product structure, but Codex became a strong assistant for execution. When I needed quick iterations, fixes, or implementation support, Codex helped me keep moving without losing momentum.
It also worked really well for the visual generation side of the project. I used it while building the profile system and refining visual-related features. The image generation workflow worked very smoothly, and Codex helped me connect those ideas into the actual product experience.
CloudflareThe web performance & security company
5.0 (187 reviews)
Cloudflare was the right choice for me because it made domain management, deployment, performance, and security much easier to handle in one place.
I chose Cloudflare for my domain setup because the interface was simple, fast, and easy to manage. Everything felt organized, from DNS settings to website configuration, which made the process much less stressful.
Wrangler was also a big reason. It made deployment and project management smoother, especially when working with modern web infrastructure. Being able to manage and deploy things quickly from the development side saved a lot of time.
Another important reason was Cloudflare Workers. They are fast, reliable, and cost-effective, which made Cloudflare a practical choice for my project. The pricing felt reasonable, and the performance benefits were strong.
Overall, I chose Cloudflare because it gave me an easy management panel, strong domain and DNS control, fast deployment with Wrangler, affordable Workers, and a reliable infrastructure for both performance and security.
GitHubHow people build software
5.0 (621 reviews)
GitHub was the natural choice because it is almost indispensable for file management, folder structure, version control, and developer workflows.
I used GitHub because it made the project easier to organize and manage. Keeping the codebase, folders, branches, updates, and collaboration flow in one place helped me work in a much more controlled and professional way.
For a project with many files, agents, features, and platform-specific parts, GitHub became the safest way to track everything. It helped me avoid confusion, manage changes clearly, and keep the development process clean.
Overall, I chose GitHub because it is an industry-standard tool for code storage, file management, version control, and structured development. For this kind of project, it felt like the most reliable and necessary option.
Claude CodeAnthropic’s deep-context AI coder
5.0 (543 reviews)
Claude Code stood out because it handled complex architecture, product design, and technical planning more professionally than the alternatives.
I was working on a project that involved web, desktop, and macOS compatibility. When I explained complex requirements, Claude Code understood the bigger picture, broke the work into clear steps, and helped me plan the system in a complete way.
What mattered most was that it did not only generate code. It helped me organize the visual structure, product flow, architecture, and implementation plan. When I shared messy ideas or complicated workflows, it turned them into a clear and professional development roadmap.