Mention @Cursor in any Teams channel to delegate a task
Cursor's cloud agent is now accessible in Microsoft Teams.
Mention @Cursor in any channel to delegate tasks, auto-select repos and models, and get a PR created for team review.
I love @Cursor. It's enabled me to build (vibe code) so many web apps, sites, extensions, and little things quickly that 1. bring me joy and 2. help me with work or realize personal projects. However... I'm seeing a TON of movement around @Claude by Anthropic's Claude Code. I haven't personally tried it but it's apparently insane (and can also be expensive?) I'm curious. Should I switch? What are you currently using? Or do they both have their own use case. I right now like cursor because I can build directly in a GitHub repo or locally and it helps me learn my way around an IDE. Looking forward to hearing everyone's thoughts!
Last month, Cursor launched for the fifth time on Product Hunt in 2025.
The 2024 Product of the Year [1] still hits the charts. They have launched web and mobile agents, a visual editor, and 2.0, consistently ranking in the Top 5 Products of the Day.
Tines — Build agents & automations integrated across your workspace
Build agents & automations integrated across your workspace
Promoted
Be the first to comment
5.0
Based on 844 reviews
Review Cursor?
Reviewers mostly see Cursor as a fast, context-aware coding tool that fits directly into everyday development, helping them write, refactor, debug, and ship faster with less context switching. Users repeatedly praise its codebase understanding, smooth workflow, and strong multi-file edits, often preferring it to Copilot or other AI editors. Makers of Product Hunt and Vozo AI — Video localization also say it works well for rapid prototyping. The main complaints are cost and pricing confusion, occasional slowness or instability, token burn, and output that can be overly verbose or still needs careful review.
This product is a good solution when you start doing software. But first I think you should to learn some lessons from Cursor docs. Otherwise you could burn all your dollars on first iterations of working with it.
What needs improvement
high memory usage (2)subscription cost (6)thinking-loop (1)
As I told before you could burn your token in during of the day. And when you working by Auto regime, it could send your request to gemini fast and you see the same loop of thinking which does not stop and going to burn your tokens. Therefore it's better to test some models by self before come to Cursor. And yes, I understand that Cursor can't to share the same level of tokens as other AI providers. But anyway even 20/60$ subs does not align to my consume and 200$ is expensive for me.
vs Alternatives
Because I could work seamless with my servers, do bugfix, I really love bugfix regime how it works and debug by self, without my participation.
The best coding agent for a while. it is expensive though. you pay a premium price for a premium agent.
What needs improvement
subscription cost (6)
pricing is an issue, especially because that different plans that everybody has. there is not enough clarity about pricing. one can spend 2 requests (same for any other model) for an opus 4.6 request, while other can spend 7 dollars
Cursor is just better at using the given model up to its limits. None of the other agentic products success that much. Also plan mode is a beast if you give some time to your task and plan everything carefully. While coding with the popular tech stacks, Cursor executes the plan flawlessly most of the time.
Cursor feels like coding with a second brain. It’s fast, context-aware, and actually understands what you’re trying to build—not just what you typed. You can refactor files, generate features, debug issues, and navigate large codebases without breaking flow.