The open source coding agent that takes over your editor, terminal, and browser to complete work autonomously.
This is the 4th launch from Cline. View more
ClinePass
Launching today
ClinePass gives Cline users one $9.99/month subscription for top open-weight coding models like GLM, Kimi, DeepSeek, and more. Use powerful models inside Cline with 2–5x standard API rate limits, without juggling provider accounts, API keys, billing pages, or model availability. Built for developers who want Cline’s agentic coding workflow with a simpler, faster open-model stack.
Free Options
Launch Team
Lovable
Claude by Anthropic
OpenAI
Cline
👋 Hey Product Hunt,
I’m Saoud, founder of Cline.
What we’re launching today🚀
Cline is built to be the best agent harness for open-weights coding models. Today, we’re launching ClinePass: a $9.99/month subscription that gives developers low-cost access to top open coding models across Cline’s CLI and IDE Extension.
Try ClinePass for $1.99/month at https://cline.bot/product-hunt (discount available only for the next 15 days)
We recommend you to use ClinePass together with Cline CLI: install via npm i -g cline on your terminal!
Why ClinePass❓
Open models are getting seriously good for coding. They’re becoming more capable, more flexible, and often much more cost-effective for real development workflows. But using them well is still harder than it should be.
The challenge is twofold: open models are spread across providers, accounts, and API keys, and even after setup, developers still have to figure out which models are actually good for agentic coding, which ones hold up across long-running tasks, and which harness brings out their strengths in real development workflows. Heard about GLM 5.2 but not sure where to try it? Trying to keep up with Kimi, DeepSeek, MiniMax, Mimo, and every new coding model release? Want to know which ones actually perform well inside an agent, not just on a benchmark?
That’s why we built ClinePass: ClinePass gives you simple access to leading open-weights coding models, directly inside Cline’s agentic development workflow.
What you get with ClinePass
🔷 Access to best-in-class open-weights coding models
🔷 Models curated, tested, and benchmarked for agentic coding
🔷 $9.99/month for reliable access with 2-5x API rate limits (to be clear: we are trying our best to explore what we can afford to offer here, and some of those pricing/limits are subject to change and we will keep it transparent with the community)
🔷 Use it across Cline’s IDE Extension and CLI
🔷 Models included: GLM 5.2, Kimi K2.7-Code, Kimi K2.6, Deepseek-v4-pro, Deepseek-v4-flash, Minimax-M3, Mimo-v2.5, MiMo-V2.5-Pro, (more to come!)
🔷 No lock-in: keep using any providers and models with Cline
Where we’re headed ✨
We see this as another step toward a more open, flexible, and developer-controlled future for AI coding. Developers should be able to use the models they want, inside the workflow they already trust, without being locked into one provider or one closed system.
We’re excited to share ClinePass with the Product Hunt community today and would love your feedback!
the $9.99 flat unlock for cline plus open weights is the right counter to per-token paranoia. once you stop watching the meter the agent can actually think for ten more seconds instead of being told to be brief. that changes what people let an agent attempt.
curious how rate-limiting works once a model has a slow day. soft-degrade to a smaller model in the pool, or just queue? for autonomous workflows the worst behavior is silent failure to complete.
Cline
@thenameisarian we don't soft downgrade, we have a lot of different providers for those open weights models and they load balance to ensure a good throughput
The flat price is the headline, but the thing I'd actually stress-test is long-horizon behavior. Open weights like GLM or DeepSeek can match frontier on a single completion and still drift over a 40-tool-call autonomous run, re-reading the same file or losing the original task. We hit exactly that building agent loops, the failure was never one bad call, it was accumulation across many. Does ClinePass let you mix models inside one session, say a stronger one for planning and a cheaper one to execute, or are you on one model per run?
Cline
@dipankar_sarkar we would love to have you try out on Cline, where we tuned the agent performance specifically and it's the best agent harness across open source agents. We've seen it performing really well in long horizon tasks.
ClinePass let you mix models inside one session for sure, you can choice different model for planning and executing.
For me personally I think that the consolidation angle is the real win. There is so much friction in juggling separate DeepSeek, GLM, and Kimi keys and billing pagesthat hits at the worst possible moment. One sub that just works is a clean pitch. One question: with all these under one harness, does ClinePass route to the best model per task, or do I pick per request? Curious especially whether you can split roles in a single run since that's usually where long-horizon agent runs hold up or fall apart.
Cline
@david_vilalta absolutely agree!
we don't route model automatically - we give users the best freedom to choose right now
the SDK option is what separates this from most coding agents. being able to embed an autonomous coding agent into your own tools and workflows instead of only using it through an IDE is a much bigger unlock. most teams don't just need an agent that writes code, they need one that fits into their existing CI pipeline and review process. how does cline handle the review step? does it wait for approval before committing or can you set it to auto-commit on low risk changes?
Cline
@shubham4real you can easily setup any review agents using our SDK - the goal's to allow any developer build their own agents easily.
You can find a lot of examples here: https://github.com/cline/cline/tree/main/sdk/examples
Congrats for your launch! The SDK, IDE extension, and CLI options caught my eye. Are these meant to be equivalent surfaces for the same autonomous coding agent, or do you expect different use cases for each one?
Cline
@crystalmei hey Xuefei! Renee from Cline team here. Those are for different developer performance and we want to be open choices for everyone. IDE extensions are typically more for hands-on developers, while CLI suits for more autonomous use cases, and SDK is what developer used to build their own agents!
The "no juggling provider accounts / API keys / billing pages" angle is the real pain point here. Two questions: with GLM, Kimi and DeepSeek under one sub, does ClinePass auto-route to the best model per task, or do I pick per request? And are the 2–5x rate limits relative to hitting the providers directly, or to Cline's default tier?
Cline
@hung_tran_from_notebook_os Right now, user choose their own model which one to use. The 2-5x is relative to hitting providers directly.