
Claude by Anthropic
A family of foundational AI models
5.0β’825 reviewsβ’59K followers
A family of foundational AI models
5.0β’825 reviewsβ’59K followers

59K followers
59K followers
Claude Code genuinely changed the way I work. I started coding again after 15 years, and even though I originally began with Cursor, Claude Code became my main tool very quickly.
But the bigger thing is not just coding itself. A huge amount of operational and repetitive work can now be delegated step-by-step to Claude Code. It helps transform ideas into execution much faster and removes a lot of friction from daily workflows. For a technical founder, this is not just βAI codingβ β it feels more like an intelligent operational layer for the company.
The biggest missing piece for me is image generation and image workflow transparency.
I still use ChatGPT or Banana for many visual tasks because the image tooling around Claude is not yet strong enough. Iβd especially love better debugging and visibility into what happened during image-related operations.
For example, it would be incredibly useful to have simple controls for things like transparency handling and clearer step-by-step feedback about why a task execution failed. That kind of observability would make the workflow much more reliable for professional use.
In my opinion, Claude Code has the strongest βvibeβ for modern technical founders working deeply with AI.
There are many strong alternatives β Cursor, Codex, and other AI-native tools β and some are very close technically. But Anthropic keeps shipping system-level improvements and thoughtful UX decisions that make Claude feel consistently ahead.
The product feels opinionated in the right way: less focused on flashy demos, more focused on real workflows, context handling, and long-term productivity. That combination makes it my preferred tool today.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the backbone of our entire platform, Humans.Team. Over 85 development sessions, Claude Code (powered by Sonnet) built 90% of our Next.js application β from Supabase database architecture and Row Level Security policies to AI journal integration, real-time notifications, PWA offline support, and a bilingual FR/EN system across 30+ pages.
What sets Sonnet 4.6 apart is its ability to hold deep context across long sessions. It remembers architectural decisions from hours ago, understands our codebase patterns, and writes production-ready TypeScript that rarely needs fixing. The reasoning is exceptional β it debugs complex issues by tracing through multiple files and connections.
We also use Claude Desktop daily for content strategy, press releases, blog articles, and bilingual copywriting. The nuance in both French and English is remarkable.
Context window limits can be frustrating during very long sessions β the conversation gets compressed and some earlier decisions are lost. Also, occasional over-eagerness to add unnecessary abstractions or comments when a simple fix is all that is needed. But these are minor compared to the massive value it delivers daily.
We evaluated ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, and Gemini. Claude won on three fronts: superior code quality with fewer hallucinations, exceptional long-context understanding (critical for our 85+ session codebase), and genuinely better bilingual output in French and English. The Claude Code CLI is a game-changer β it reads files, edits code, runs commands, and thinks through problems autonomously. Nothing else comes close for building a full-stack application from vision to production.
The contextual understanding is on another level. It actually holds the thread across a long conversation and responds like it grasped the nuance, not just the surface of what you asked. For writing, analysis, and working through complex problems, nothing else comes close right now.
The message limits are the biggest frustration. You hit a wall right in the middle of deep work and have to wait, which completely kills the flow. The typography in responses could also be cleaner. And some form of context sharing across conversations would make it significantly more powerful for ongoing projects.
Used ChatGPT for a long time and still keep it around. But Claude handles longer context better and the responses feel more thoughtful and less generic. For anything requiring careful reasoning or careful writing, Claude wins pretty consistently.
This is my personal response. I left a platform where I was top 10% global user and top 1% messages sent globally. My experience with Claude over the last two months has far much exceeded what was capable on other platforms.
I love the no nonsense UI experience.
The experience has been so great, I have literally forgot about the other one in daily use. Especially for coding.
Claude has helped me deliver the type of service and products I dreamed of doing 12 years ago.
I actually look forward to coming and building with Claude.
It understands it is assistant quite well.
Now, I have to say this part frustrated me the most. For creative minds, to see that pop up in the middle of a prompt is just next level frustrating. So much it took my focus momentarily to search it up. That was the one time I remember recently thinking about βI was never treated this way on paid subscription on the other one. Was I?β So yeah. Need to do something about that. I know Iβm not the only one thinking that because there are conversations out there specifically about this.
Thatβs the only thing for me right now.
Because it catches the vision for the type of builds I am committed to: clean, minimalist, and elegant.
Prompt output is spot on most time.
Code is clean and doesnβt have to constantly be cleaned up.
Used it to build an entire iOS app from scratch with no coding background. The ability to think through problems, iterate on ideas, and get specific technical help in one place has boosted my output alot. Not just a productivity tool, but more like a thinking partner.
Would be cool to access chats inside Claude Code even if you subscription ends
Claude has fast become an irreplaceable sidekick (or mastermind, but what do I know?) to both my personal life and startup.
I particularly enjoy its ability to understand and recall context from different chats, making it a lot easier to continue your thought process without stopping to remind it on background information.
Claude replies also come with nuance and warmth, making it feel a lot more natural without being overly pleasing.
Pricing
While it has a lot of merits, I'd like Claude to be more transparent about what it thinks I need regarding subscription plan. Instead of a trial-and-error process, it would be helpful for Claude to estimate what is required and suggest which level of subscription I should get on. Having used Claude for a few months now, I believe there is enough data for Claude to make suggestions.
I'd happily accept the risk that Claude over-estimates my credit needs, rather than having to guess β only to hit a wall when you're in the flow.
Onboarding
There is a lot of discussion about how Claude works differently than ChatGPT and other platforms. For ease of migration, it's worth considering having some of those differences (and how a user should adapt) be part of the UI β instead of only living in the docs.
Claude has the best answers (except for research, where Perplexity is still better) that balances empathy and diversity of thoughts. It also remembers previous contexts, and overall makes it easy to create dedicated spaces for each projects.
Claude is super smart, easy to work with, and great at staying on track even with complicated questions. It writes really well and feels thoughtful compared to some other chatbots. Sometimes itβs a bit overly careful, but that also means I can trust its responses more. Definitely one of the best AI assistants out there.
It also doesnβt always know the latest information, and its answers can occasionally feel wordy or generalized.
I picked Claude because it feels thoughtful, clear, and helpful in its responses. It handles complex tasks well without being overwhelming, and its emphasis on safety and reliability makes it easy to trust for everyday use.
Claude holds context like a thinking partner, not just a text generator. As a 2-person founding team I use it across everything (content, growth, strategy, UX copy, HTML...) and it keeps up across all of it in one conversation.
The browser extension doesn't share context with the main Claude interface. So you constantly have to re-explain things you've already worked through. A unified context across surfaces would make a big difference.
I've tried ChatGPT and Gemini, but Claude is the one I keep coming back to. The tone is less generic, it pushes back when something doesn't make sense, and it handles long, multi-topic conversations without losing the thread. For founder work that jumps between strategy and execution, that consistency matters.
I am a marketer and content writer myself, and Claude has become the one LLM that's actually worth paying money for. I find that it's better for long, more complex texts and copy, rather than for short marketingey stuff. It understands context really well, and once you invest some more time into writing an elaborate prompt β the output is usually great. Still needs some tweaking, but saves me loads of time. ChatGPT doesn't even come close.
The biggest advantage over other LLMs, in my opinion, is that the output really does sound human, and (if you do a good enough prompt with some examples) it doesn't use the classic generic phrases like "In today's world" and "Here's the thing".
I use Claude (on the web and mobile) and Claude Code every day, with great results. While I still use Gemini and (rarely) ChatGPT in parallel, Claude is my go-to now. It seamlessly goes back and forth between regular chat and deep research, is really good at web search, and returns nuanced, logical results, including telling me when I'm wrong. And Claude Code with Opus 4.5 (and now 4.6) handles everything I throw at it.
Very little, TBH. The models themselves improve frequently, and the tooling improves rapidly. Especially Claude Code gets major new features on a weekly basis.
I used ChatGPT for years, Gemini for at least 1 year, and other tools. Claude has emerged as my go-to solution.

I built a full AI agent marketplace in 7 days. Claude was my CPO.
Every product decision, every UX pattern, every Lovable prompt, every edge case, every bug diagnosis, every pitch deck slide, every UAT script, every payment flow, every earnings model, every copy line on the platform went through Claude first.
Claude did not just answer questions. It pushed back when I was wrong. It told me when my assumptions were off. It researched best practices before recommending anything. It helped me think through trust, transparency, and framing for an AI platform that puts human accountability at the center.
I would describe what I wanted. Claude would translate that into a production-grade Lovable prompt, a Supabase migration, an Edge Function spec, or a one-page investor pitch. Sometimes all four in the same conversation.
What surprised me most was not the technical capability. It was the judgment. Claude consistently asked the right question before building the wrong thing. That is what a great CPO does.
Konfide is a solo-founder company. But with Claude as CPO and Lovable as CTO, it does not feel like one. It launches on Product Hunt on April 10. None of it would exist without this stack.
I built a full AI agent marketplace in 7 days. Claude was my CPO.
Every product decision, every UX pattern, every Lovable prompt, every edge case, every bug diagnosis, every pitch deck slide, every UAT script, every payment flow, every earnings model, every copy line on the platform went through Claude first.
Claude did not just answer questions. It pushed back when I was wrong. It told me when my assumptions were off. It researched best practices before recommending anything. It helped me think through trust, transparency, and framing for an AI platform that puts human accountability at the center.
I would describe what I wanted. Claude would translate that into a production-grade Lovable prompt, a Supabase migration, an Edge Function spec, or a one-page investor pitch. Sometimes all four in the same conversation.
What surprised me most was not the technical capability. It was the judgment. Claude consistently asked the right question before building the wrong thing. That is what a great CPO does.
Konfide is a solo-founder company. But with Claude as CPO and Lovable as CTO, it does not feel like one. It launches on Product Hunt on April 10. None of it would exist without this stack.

Claude has been my partner in crime and the ultimate guide to self growth in this industry!
Claude has been my partner in crime and the ultimate guide to self growth in this industry!