GPT-5.1 represents a meaningful step forward in LLM capabilities. Three key improvements stand out:
1. Engine Segmentation & Personality Presets
The ability to segment different engine types with distinct personalities is genuinely useful. As a GTM builder, this means I can deploy contextually-optimized responses without extensive prompt engineering overhead.
2. Superior Instruction Following
The model now handles multi-step constraints simultaneously. Complex instructions that previously required 3-4 iterations now work on the first try. This directly reduces latency in production systems.
3. Improved Tone Adaptation
GPT-5.1 understands conversational context better. It shifts tone appropriately based on input, which matters more than people realize for enterprise adoption. Technical superiority loses to human-like interaction every time.
The Real Unlock: This isn't a revolutionary leap. It's a solid incremental advance that compounds when deployed at scale. The real advantage goes to teams building on top of this—not those claiming AGI is here.
Hey Hunters 🚀
Today I’m sharing Prism by OpenAI — a powerful, free workspace for scientists and researchers to write, collaborate, and build research papers using a LaTeX-native, cloud-based editor, fully powered by GPT-5.2.
What makes Prism special?
Unlimited projects & collaborators
Cloud-based, LaTeX-native research workspace
GPT-5.2 works inside your project with full context — equations, references, structure & more
Designed specifically for scientific writing & collaboration
Prism is available today for anyone with a ChatGPT personal account, with Business, Team, Enterprise & Education plans coming soon.
If you’re a researcher, student, or academic — this could seriously change how you write papers.
Would love to hear your thoughts & feedback!
Does Prism let you lock parts of the document (e.g., equations, custom commands) so GPT only assists where invited?
Since Prism understands the full context, can it detect logical contradictions between the results in a table and the analysis in the discussion section automatically?
with few line of chat🤯🤯it preety much can do anything, more then Overleaf with na·tive GPT intelligence, I would say! i am thinking how futher you guys can take it..
Big question: does GPT-5.2 understand arXiv-style notation, or will it “correct” my \mathcal{H} into something weird?