OpenAI

OpenAI

APIs and tools for building AI products

5.0
676 reviews

9.5K followers

The most powerful platform for building AI products. Build and scale AI experiences powered by industry-leading models and tools.
This is the 16th launch from OpenAI. View more

Prism

Launched this week
A free, LaTeX-native workspace for scientists
Introducing Prism, a free workspace for scientists to write and collaborate on research, powered by GPT-5.2.
Prism gallery image
Prism gallery image
Prism gallery image
Prism gallery image
Prism gallery image
Prism gallery image
Prism gallery image
Free
Launch tags:WritingScience
Launch Team
Anima Playground
AI with an Eye for Design
Promoted

What do you think? …

Ankit Sharma
Hunter
📌

Hey Hunters 🚀

Today I’m sharing Prism by OpenAI — a powerful, free workspace for scientists and researchers to write, collaborate, and build research papers using a LaTeX-native, cloud-based editor, fully powered by GPT-5.2.

What makes Prism special?

  • Unlimited projects & collaborators

  • Cloud-based, LaTeX-native research workspace

  • GPT-5.2 works inside your project with full context — equations, references, structure & more

  • Designed specifically for scientific writing & collaboration

Prism is available today for anyone with a ChatGPT personal account, with Business, Team, Enterprise & Education plans coming soon.

If you’re a researcher, student, or academic — this could seriously change how you write papers.

Would love to hear your thoughts & feedback!

Zypressen

Does Prism let you lock parts of the document (e.g., equations, custom commands) so GPT only assists where invited?

Xiang Lei

Since Prism understands the full context, can it detect logical contradictions between the results in a table and the analysis in the discussion section automatically?

Moon Bohara

with few line of chat🤯🤯it preety much can do anything, more then Overleaf with na·tive GPT intelligence, I would say! i am thinking how futher you guys can take it..

Zypressen

Big question: does GPT-5.2 understand arXiv-style notation, or will it “correct” my \mathcal{H} into something weird?