I'm building Web3Connect to solve B2B discovery in Web3, but I want to make sure we're solving the right problems first.
When you're looking for an auditor, agency, dev shop, or legal counsel in Web3 what's the actual pain point?
A) Finding them at all (discovery) B) Knowing who's legit vs. who's just good at marketing (vetting) C) Comparing pricing/scope across providers (evaluation) D) Something else entirely?
I'm building in public and genuinely willing to pivot based on what I hear. What would make this indispensable for you?
Every major B2B directory (G2, Clutch, etc.) eventually lets vendors pay for placement. I've made the opposite bet rankings on Web3Connect are 100% merit-based, weighted by verified reviews. A two-person audit firm with great reviews outranks a well-funded competitor with none.
This means we're leaving money on the table from day one. But in a space where a bad audit can mean a $100M exploit, we think trust matters more than ad revenue.
Am I naive, or is this the right call? Curious what the community thinks.
Web3Connect is the first B2B discovery platform built for Web3.
Find and vet auditors, agencies, dev shops and more across 150+ Web3-specific categories — ranked by verified client reviews, not ad spend.
Built for AI discovery from day one: every page serves structured data to ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity via the llms.txt standard.
Merit-based rankings. Transparent scoring. 1,200+ partners. Free.