We tracked every time the news and the money disagreed. The money is losing.
I build a free app that puts each market headline next to what institutional money actually did on that ticker — dark pool share, options positioning, flow. When the story and the money point opposite ways, we mark it a divergence.
The uncomfortable part: we score them. Three days after every divergence, we check who was right and the running tally stays on screen where anyone can see it. As of this morning it reads: money 36, news 42, draw 62.
So the headline was right more often than the flow was. I could have hidden that number. I left it up, because a signal you cannot audit is just a vibe.
Two things I would genuinely like other makers' read on:
Does publishing a scoreboard that currently makes your own signal look average build trust, or does it just talk people out of trying the product?
Three days is the window I picked for scoring. It is short enough to feel honest and long enough for positioning to play out — but it is still a choice I made, not a fact. If you have a better argument for a different window I will take it.
It is free, no account, English/Korean/Japanese, and it launches here on Product Hunt tomorrow.
(Information and education only — not investment advice.)
Replies