Why most poker tools fail at pure logic?

While building ApexCoachPokerTraining, I noticed that many training tools focus too much on 'visuals' and not enough on the underlying mathematical variance. I wanted to create a system that forces the brain to recognize patterns, not just memorize charts.

My question to the community: When you're training, do you prefer a 'guided' experience that tells you the answer, or a 'stress-test' environment that punishes logical errors? I’ve leaned towards the latter, and I’m curious if this resonates with other data-driven players.