We've been talking to hundreds of teams building with Cursor, Claude Code, and other agentic tools and the honest answer from most of them is: "We just run it and hope."
Some do a quick manual click-through. Some write a few spot checks. Some just ship and wait for users to find the bugs.
We built TestSprite to solve exactly this autonomous testing that runs from your PRD and codebase but I'm curious what your actual workflow looks like before you merge.
Been spending more time writing tests than actual code lately. Coverage requirements keep creeping up, and hand-writing edge cases for async flows is exhausting.
TestSprite caught my eye because it claims to generate tests by analyzing your existing code structure not just stubbing them out. The part that surprised me: it apparently identifies race conditions and boundary conditions that manual writers tend to skip.
Meet the missing layer of the agentic workflow. TestSprite MCP connects to your IDE and autonomously generates your entire test suite — no prompting or manual work. New in 2.1: a 4–5x faster testing engine that finishes in minutes, a visual test editor where you click any step to see a live snapshot and fix it instantly, and GitHub integration that auto-runs your full suite on every PR against a live preview deployment — then blocks the merge if anything fails. Your AI codes. We make it right.
TestSprite 2.0 is your coding agent’s best partner. With the new MCP, it analyzes your specs, validates AI-generated code, runs tests, and suggests fixes—so when your agent codes, we make it work right.
TestSprite delivers AI-powered, fully automated end-to-end testing solutions. These include proposing testing plans, generating test codes, executing test cases, and providing comprehensive analysis reports.
