I am building Anotee after watching client feedback get scattered between email, chat and shared review links.
The premise is simple: every note should stay attached to the exact timecode and video version it refers to. I am looking for ten editors or small production teams to try the workflow on a real project and tell me where it fails.
This is my product, not an independent recommendation. If you use Frame.io, email, WhatsApp, or another tool today: what breaks first when a third review round begins?
You no longer need to start with an existing MIDI file. ShevtoneAudio can now create music from scratch.
Generate original music automatically Create complete MIDI compositions Turn ideas into cinematic arrangements Great for cinematic, trailer, game & film music Download the MIDI and continue editing in your favorite DAW
From a blank project to an editable MIDI composition in minutes.
Hi everyone! I m the solo developer behind Flow Watch. I built it because I wanted Apple Watch health data to be easier to understand not just raw numbers, but meaningful stress and wellness insights. It s my first App Store app, and I m actively improving it based on user feedback. I d really appreciate your thoughts, feature ideas, or questions. Thanks for checking it out!
Over the past several months, I've been building ToolsRoot, a platform with 70+ browser-based tools for PDFs, images, documents, audio, video, and archives.
The biggest surprise wasn't the engineering it was discovering how many everyday file workflows are still surprisingly frustrating.
People often have to:
Visit multiple websites for different file types.
Wait for uploads before anything happens.
Create accounts just to complete a simple task.
Worry about where their files are stored afterward.
I posted this morning about Pesterly. It chases your clients for the things you're waiting on files, forms, logins, an answer to a question you've already asked three times.
It's sitting at #9, which is more than I expected from a product with no customers, no logos, and a page that admits both.
We kept running into the same objection pitching AI chatbots and voice agents to local businesses: nobody believes it'll work for their business specifically until they see it running on it.
So instead of demoing a generic bot on a sales call, we built a system that generates a real, working demo an actual chatbot or a live AI voice call personalized to a specific prospect's business, automatically, before the call ever happens. It turned "trust me" into "here, this is already running on your business."
Launched AutomationGini today as basically the product of that lesson it finds leads, builds them a live demo, and follows up until they engage.
Curious how others building agency or sales tooling handle this same problem: do you lean on live personalized demos, case studies, money-back guarantees, something else? What's actually gotten a skeptical prospect to say yes for you?
