Self-Promotion
Show off what you're working on
Start new thread

What are you building? Drop your AI product below

by•

Doing one of these because I get more from reading what others are building than from any newsletter.

I'll start.

Building AI Hive, an enterprise AI agent platform that helps mid-market and enterprise teams get from AI pilot to production in weeks instead of quarters. The hard problem we keep solving: compliance, model flexibility, and the lack of in-house AI talent on the customer side.

Product Hunt page:

Your turn. Drop:

- What you're building

- Who it's for

- The hardest part you're solving right now

Will read everything and upvote what resonates.

2.4K views

Add a comment

Replies

Best

What I'm building: Listiq AI, Car tool where the AI is not allowed to lie about the car. It identifies the car from a photo, lists the dents and rust instead of hiding them, decodes the VIN, and puts the car on a new background without touching the car itself. Paid side is listing automation for used car dealers.

Who it's for: Online private car sellers and small dealers.

Hardest part: 4 weeks old, solo, and I don't know yet if free tool users or dealers come first.

Site:

 Thanks for building this, "AI not allowed to lie about the car" is such a sharp positioning line, car listings hiding damage is one of those industry-wide trust problems nobody talks about directly.

Solo and 4 weeks in is no joke. My honest take on your free-tool-vs-dealer question: go free users first, dealers convert better once they see real listings already using it and trust the tool from seeing it in the wild.

 Thanks Nolan. Free users first is my bet too, and the lower cost makes it easy, one free tool is manageable, so I can serve free users while I learn what converts. How did AI Hive get its first paying customer, sideline watcher or direct outreach?

 Honestly love this question. From what we've seen, the first paying customer almost never comes from cold outreach, it's usually someone who was already lurking on a free tier or a template, hit a wall with scale/compliance, then asked to talk. So keep shipping the free tool loudly, the upgrade conversation tends to start itself once someone hits a real limit.

 That maps well. My free tools already have daily limits that end in a signup prompt, so the wall is built in. "Keep shipping loudly" is the part I needed to hear. Thanks, this was genuinely useful.

Ovandor — just put our page up, launching August 3.

We're building a Personal Intelligence engine: you talk, write, or drop in a document, and it builds a living map of how your thinking connects over time — no folders, no tags, nothing to organize. Something you said in January can show back up exactly when it matters for a decision in July.

Would love a follow or any early feedback if it's relevant to how you think:

 Congrats on getting the page up, and thanks for sharing ahead of launch. The "no folders, no tags" pitch is bold, most people I know still default to organizing manually even when a tool says it's not needed.

The idea of something you said in January resurfacing exactly when it's relevant in July is a strong hook, that's basically the dream of a second brain that doesn't need maintenance. Following for launch day, good luck on Aug 3.

Early feedback: would love to know how it handles conflicting or outdated info over time. If it's not too much to ask, check out AI Hive too, we build automation flows for productivity, an upvote/follow would mean a lot:

If you’ve ever taught a class, tutored a student, or helped a kid with homework, you know the dreaded Sunday-night ritual: retyping textbook questions, fighting with formatting, and hunting for material that actually matches your specific lesson plan.

An hour later, you have one worksheet. And you need three more by Friday.

That’s why we built SheetGenie.


SheetGenie is a lightning-fast tool that takes the busywork out of teaching. We let you turn any textbook page, PDF, or handwritten note into a professional, ready-to-print worksheet—or an auto-graded online test—in under 60 seconds.

Here is how it works: 📸 1. Snap it (Import): Take a photo of your textbook, upload a PDF, or just type a topic. No rigid curriculum menus or syllabus databases required. 🗣️ 2. Say the word (Build): Pick your format (Multiple choice, true/false, fill-in-the-blanks, math, etc.) and give plain-text instructions like "Make 10 questions on this topic in French." 🖨️ 3. Generate: Instantly export a print-ready PDF with an answer key, or share a link for students to take the test online (yes, we auto-grade it for you!).

Why we think you'll love it:

  • It’s YOUR material: Because it works off your photos and PDFs, every question matches exactly what you actually taught—not a generic question bank.

  • Global & Multilingual: Generate worksheets in any language and for any subject.

  • Print or Digital: Beautiful, publisher-grade layouts for the classroom, or paperless auto-graded tests for remote work.

Whether you're a tutor building your brand, a teacher differentiating materials for different reading levels, or a parent making extra practice for tonight's chapter—SheetGenie is built to give you your evenings back.

We are currently opening up our waitlist for early access (which comes with free bonus credits at launch 🎁).

We’d love to hear your feedback, use cases, or feature requests! What would you snap a photo of first? Let us know below! 👇

 Thanks for sharing this, the "retyping textbook questions on a Sunday night" line hit way too close to home. I've tutored before and the amount of time lost just reformatting material instead of actually teaching is real pain.

Love that it works off your own photos/PDFs instead of a generic bank, that's the part that actually makes it usable for a real lesson plan. Curious how it handles messy handwriting though, that's usually where these tools fall apart.

Followed and upvoted, rooting for SheetGenie to take off. If you get a sec, would mean a lot if you checked out AI Hive too, we're building automation flows to help teams work faster, an upvote/follow would be awesome:

I’m building – a planning and work tracking tool that fits naturally into the way freelancers and small teams actually work.

Instead of juggling planners, calendars, timers, invoices and status updates, Fluentime brings everything together in one workflow. Plan your work visually, capture it with voice, let AI turn rough notes into professional records, and share live progress with clients.

The goal isn’t better time tracking. It’s spending less time on admin and more time doing billable work.

The hardest challenge? Making all of that feel effortless.

 

Thanks for sharing this, the "juggling planners, calendars, timers, invoices" line describes basically every freelance setup I've seen, mine included. Admin work eating into billable hours is the real tax nobody talks about when people romanticize freelancing.

Voice notes turning into professional records is the part that stands out most, most tools ask you to type structured input which defeats the purpose when you're mid-task and just want to capture a thought fast. Making it feel effortless is genuinely the hard part though, that's usually where these tools either win or quietly get abandoned after week two.

Upvoted and following along, would love to see how Fluentime handles this at launch. If you get a chance, I'd really appreciate you checking out too, we're building automation flows to help teams work more efficiently, happy to upvote/follow back

Thanks ! I really appreciate you taking the time to write such thoughtful feedback.

You nailed the problem I’m trying to solve. Most productivity tools are great at recording work, but not at fitting naturally into the way people actually work. If tracking feels like admin, people stop doing it.

I also checked out AI Hive—really like the focus on getting AI agents from prototype to production. That gap between building something cool and actually deploying it is a huge pain point. Wishing you and the team lots of success with it!

Looking forward to following your journey as well. 🚀

 Really appreciate you taking the time to check AI Hive out too, means a lot. And yeah the prototype to production gap is brutal, we watch teams get a demo working in an afternoon then spend months just trying to get it to survive contact with real data and real edge cases. Wishing you tons of luck with the tracking tool, that "feels like admin" trap you mentioned is exactly why most tools in that space die quietly.

What I'm building:
: a browser extension for temporary project teams that turns everyone's browsing into shared team intelligence, then surfaces overlaps, blind spots, and tensions across the team's research.

Who it's for:
Analysts and researchers on short, bounded team projects (PE/consulting case teams, diligence sprints, student research groups) who need to move fast and understand how to best contribute to their group.

The hardest part I'm solving right now:

Distribution. The product itself works. I've got a real prototype designed for zero-approval onboarding, but I don't have a repeatable way to get it in front of the actual teams who'd use it (PE/consulting analysts, student research groups). Right now, I'm just cold calling with no idea how to scale.

 Thanks for laying this out, the distribution problem you're describing hits close to home honestly, having a working prototype but no repeatable way to get it in front of the right people is such a specific kind of stuck. Cold calling with no scale plan yet sounds exhausting, respect for grinding through it anyway.

Hope FOMO finds its first real distribution channel soon, feels like once diligence teams or student research groups get a taste of it word should spread fast. Upvoted and following along, wishing you all the best getting this in front of the right teams.

Building: Clicke, a daily briefing of real buying signals (funding, hiring, expansion, leadership changes) that tells salespeople who to contact and why, right now.

For: solo sellers and small teams who don't have a research team watching the market for them.

Hardest part right now: separating a real buying signal from noise. A company hiring 6 people isn't always a signal. A company hiring its first VP of Sales usually is. Teaching the system to tell the difference is the whole game.

Launching July 21. Happy to swap notes with anyone else building in sales tooling.

 Appreciate you breaking this down, the "6 hires isn't a signal but a first VP of Sales usually is" line is such a sharp way to put it. That's basically the whole hard part of sales tooling in one sentence, teaching a system to tell noise from signal instead of just tracking every hire equally.

Good luck with the July 21 launch, hope Clicke crushes it and keeps sharpening that signal detection. Upvoted and following to see how it turns out. Happy to swap notes anytime, and if you're open to it, would appreciate a look at AI Hive too, we build automation flows to help teams get more done with less manual grind:

What I'm building: Nudge. A gaming platform currently with 8-ball, chess, crazy 8's, and trivia battle. Is a web app that can be downloaded as a PWA for better performance but can also be played on any phone or computer.

Who it's for: People who enjoy gamePigeon but hated the lagging updates, hate being stuck on IOS exclusively, and want a company that wants to provide what the people want.

Hardest part: Currently expanding the user base and updating the UI to a modern look. Currently, I have all of the games above functioning properly and have a decent UI/UX, but it's a struggle to find identity and get others involved who believe in this idea. Solo developer with no budget.

Feel free to follow on Instagram for more updates

 Thanks for sharing this, gaming apps stuck exclusively on iOS is such a real annoyance, glad someone's actually building the cross platform version instead of just complaining about it. Finding identity as a solo dev with zero budget is brutal though, that's the part that usually kills these projects before the product even gets a fair shot.

Followed on Instagram, rooting for Nudge to find its crowd. Really hope this keeps growing and finds the players it deserves, upvoted and following here too. If you get a sec, would love your eyes on AI Hive, we help teams turn manual workflows into actual automation flows so work gets done without the busywork, an upvote or follow would mean a lot

What I'm building: Veriwasp — AI powered playtester and testing suite. Bugs scare users away. Squash them before they do.

Who it's for: Anyone that wants to ship fast and not waste valuable time on manually testing each change. Just setup your flows and click run. You can even integrate Veriwasp directly into your CI/CD pipelines or connect our MCP server.

Hardest part right now: Getting the word out is our biggest challenge. We have a solid product, just need people to know about it.

First 10 credits are free (no subscription or credit card required):

PH listing:

 Appreciate you laying this out, the "bugs scare users away, squash them before they do" line is such a clean way to frame QA that most teams treat as an afterthought. CI/CD and MCP server integration is a smart move too, testing tools that only live outside your pipeline usually just get skipped when things get busy.

Getting the word out being the hardest part when the product itself is solid is such a common and frustrating spot to be in, hope Veriwasp finds its audience soon. Upvoted and following along, wishing you the best as this grows. Would love it if you took a look at AI Hive as well and gave any honest feedback or notes, we help teams build automation flows to cut down manual work, upvote or follow appreciated:

 Interesting product. AI playtesting feels strongest when it catches the things teams don’t have time to retest manually.

Are you already seeing early users use Veriwasp more for core flows before release, edge cases, or ongoing QA coverage as the product changes?

Building Routinex — AI trip planner that actually groups your itinerary by neighborhood instead of dumping a scattered list of "must-sees" on you.

Who it's for: people who end up 20 tabs deep trying to turn Reels + blog posts + ChatGPT suggestions into something that makes sense on a map. Also cruisers who stress about all-aboard timing, budget travelers tracking running costs, and groups who can't agree over text.

Hardest part: keeping AI useful without making it bossy. Nobody wants a "finished" itinerary they had no say in — so swapping stops, dodging tourist traps (Foursquare-verified spots), and rerouting around weather all had to be built in from day one, not bolted on after.

— free, no account needed until July 19th

 Being 20 tabs deep trying to turn Reels and blog posts into an actual itinerary is way too accurate, that chaos is exactly why most trip planning burns people out before the trip even starts. Keeping AI useful without making it bossy is the right instinct, nobody wants a finished plan they had zero say in.

I'm building because I experienced the frustration of sending hundreds of applications without hearing back.

It's a Chrome extension that tailors your resume directly from the job page in seconds.

The biggest challenge I'm solving now is helping job seekers not just improve their ATS score, but actually increase their chances of landing interviews. I'd love to hear what features you'd find most valuable.

 Sending hundreds of applications with zero replies is a frustration a lot of us know firsthand, and tailoring straight from the job page in seconds sounds like it actually saves the tedious part. Going beyond ATS score to real interview chances is the right target, ATS score alone never told the full story anyway.

First
Previous
•••
678
•••
Next