Do you use one coding agent to review another?
I use Codex Desktop and Claude Desktop side by side, and I often want a second agent to independently review work completed by the first one.
The workflow I’m exploring is:
Finish a design or implementation in Codex Desktop.
Ask Claude Desktop to open a new, visible review session in the same repository.
Give Claude the relevant context from the source conversation—not just the code diff.
Return Claude’s findings to the original Codex task automatically.
To be precise about the existing landscape: Claude Desktop’s Code tab runs Claude Code and supports plugins. OpenAI’s codex-plugin-cc already covers much of the Claude Desktop / Claude Code → Codex direction.
The narrower gap I’m exploring is Codex Desktop → Claude Desktop, with a consistent workflow available from either app.
I built an early open-source macOS implementation to test this:
https://github.com/WarrenJones/desktop-agent-bridge
I’m curious:
Do you use a second coding agent for independent review?
Does the reviewer need the source conversation, or is the repository and diff usually enough?
Does having a visible, resumable session in the second agent’s native app matter?
How do you handle this workflow today?
Replies