We trained our AI to ask fewer questions. Users started opening up more.

by

When we first built Murror's AI companion, we did what every AI product does -- we made it ask a lot of questions.

"How does that make you feel?"

"Can you tell me more about that?"

"What happened next?"

It felt like the right approach. Therapists ask questions. Good listeners ask questions. So our AI should too, right?

The data told a different story. Users were giving shorter responses over time. Sessions were getting briefer. Some people stopped coming back entirely.

We ran a small experiment: we reduced the AI's questions by 60% and replaced them with reflective statements. Instead of "How did that make you feel?" the AI would say something like, "That sounds like it really caught you off guard."

The results surprised us. Average session length increased by 40%. Users started writing longer, more detailed entries. And the entries became more emotionally specific -- not just "I felt bad" but "I felt like I was disappointing someone who had already given up on me."

Here's what we think happened: questions create pressure. They imply there's a right answer. Reflective statements create safety. They say "I heard you" without demanding more.

It changed how we think about AI in emotional spaces. The best AI companion isn't the one that asks the smartest questions -- it's the one that makes you feel understood enough to keep going on your own.

Has anyone else found that reducing friction (even well-intentioned friction) unlocked deeper engagement in your product?

36 views

Add a comment

Replies

Best

Powerful insight, fewer questions, deeper trust. Sometimes simplicity unlocks the most authentic conversations.

  Exactly -- and it was counterintuitive for us at first. We assumed more questions = more engagement. But trust doesn't come from being interrogated, it comes from feeling heard. Glad this resonated with you!

Good learning curve here :) when I’m taking sessions she listens to me a lot and then ask questions accordingly she is not throwing questions but also giving some response so I still don’t know whether ai can replace human side of things

  That's such an honest and important question. We don't think AI should try to replace the human side -- and honestly, it can't. What we've found is that AI works best as a space for reflection between human connections. It helps you process what you're feeling so when you do talk to someone, you show up more clearly. The goal isn't to replace your therapist or your best friend -- it's to help you understand yourself better so those real conversations go deeper.

that’s so good mona u r thinking the right way i have seen this when I don’t have someone to talk then if I want to do some analysis i will use ai to do that so that its more clear to me :) well done

  That means a lot, thank you! And honestly, that's exactly the use case we designed for -- those moments when you need to process something but don't have someone available to talk to. AI won't replace a real conversation, but it can help you sort through your thoughts so that when you do talk to someone, you're more clear about what you actually feel and need. Really glad it's helping you that way!