Which should come first: 18 days of cash or missing life cover?

I’m testing one ordering decision before MoneyMap launches on September 15.

A fictional family has ₹55,000 of essential monthly outgo and ₹33,000 it can use immediately—about 18 days. One salary supports the other adult and their child, and the reported life cover is below the modelled need.

MoneyMap puts the 18-day cash gap first because it is immediate, then shows the income-loss cover gap. Here is the worked example with every assumption visible:

https://finance.appcradle.net/sample-household/?utm_source=producthunt&utm_medium=community&utm_campaign=moneymap_prelaunch_2026_09&utm_content=risk_ordering

Two blunt questions:

1. After five seconds, can you tell what could happen and who would be affected?

2. Would you start with the ₹22,000 first-month buffer, or would you want the life-cover gap shown first?

I’m looking for the reasoning, not votes.