hrefStack - Research, write & publish SEO content on autopilot

by
hrefStack is an AI SEO tool that does the job of a full content team. One agent finds keywords worth ranking for, writes articles built for Google, AI Mode and ChatGPT, publishes them straight to WordPress, Shopify, Ghost, Wix, Drupal or Sanity, and then tracks results in Google Search Console. It is full SEO automation from start to finish. If you are comparing the best AI SEO tools in 2026, start with the one that replaces the whole workflow.

Add a comment

Replies

Best
Maker
📌

Hi Product Hunt, I'm Arsalan 👋

I come from data science and analytics. I also build SaaS and mobile apps. I have shipped a lot of products.

Here is what the last 12 months taught me:

Building is the easy part. Distribution is the hard part. 😅

Here is what I struggled with:

  1. No budget for a content marketer

  2. One good article took a full day

  3. AI writers only give you a draft

  4. Publishing to the blog was manual work

  5. No idea which articles actually worked

  6. Traffic stayed flat while I kept building

So I built an AI agent to do the whole job. That became hrefStack. 🚀

What it does for you:

✅ Finds keywords worth writing about

✅ Picks topics with traffic and low competition

✅ Writes full SEO articles, ready to go

✅ Makes articles that ChatGPT and Perplexity quote

✅ Schedules content so your blog stays active

✅ Tracks rankings with Google Search Console

How hrefStack is different:

🔄 Most tools stop at "published." hrefStack shows real results

🌐 Built for Google rankings and AI citations, both

🔌 Publishes straight to WordPress / Shopify / Ghost / Wix / Drupal / Sanity

🎁 Launch offer: first 100 Product Hunters get 30% off the first month. Code: PRODUCTHUNT

I would love to hear how you scale your apps. And I want your honest feedback, good or bad. 🙏

I am here all day. I will answer every comment.

Thank you Product Hunters. This community gives indie builders like me a chance. ❤️

P.S. Drop a comment below: what is the hardest part of growing your product? 💬

 For me it's staying visible without burning all my time on it. Building features feels productive, but writing and publishing content consistently to actually get found is the part that quietly falls off the list every week. Congrats on the launch, the "AI writers only give you a draft" point especially hit home, that's exactly the gap between having content and having a system that keeps working after you publish it.

The hardest part is that reach gets decided before you write anything.

I have been running our distribution by hand this past week and the numbers are blunt. Five comments, comparable effort, same account, same voice. One landed 221 views. The others landed 15, 12 and 9. Nothing about the writing explains that gap. The thread I picked does.

It works in the other direction too. Nine comments inside one busy megathread came out at net minus 3. Twelve everywhere else came out at plus 9. Same person, same week, opposite sign.

That is the part I care about in what we built. Choosing the keyword is the placement decision and it happens before a single word exists. Publishing is downstream of it.

What is the harder half for you, working out where to show up, or keeping it going once you have?

 Both, honestly, but keeping it going is the one that quietly kills momentum. Finding a good thread is a one-time win; showing up consistently for months is what most people (including past-me) give up on. That's actually the itch behind hrefStack - I didn't want the "where to show up" decision to eat my whole week every time, so the agent handles the keyword/placement research continuously instead of me doing it in a burst and then going quiet for a month. Curious if you've found any way to systemize the "keep showing up" half, or is it still manual grinding for you?

 Still manual, and I stopped trying to systemize the wrong half.

The part I automated is not the writing, it is the scoring. Every room I post in gets a running score, and after about ten comments the pattern stops being arguable. One room sat at plus five and never once went negative. Another sat at minus four with the same effort and the same person writing.

So showing up consistently is not the discipline problem people treat it as. It gets cheap once you have deleted the rooms that were never going to pay. I cut two last week and the daily output went down while the return went up.

What I have no answer for is the first ten comments in a new room. The score does not exist yet and you are paying to find out.

Distribution definitely feels like 80% of the battle, and placement choice dictates everything before content even gets drafted. For me, working out where to show up (picking the right keywords/threads with actual high intent) is definitely the harder half. Keeping it going becomes much easier once you know you’re already standing in front of the right audience.

   Totally agree, once the placement is right everything downstream gets easier. That's honestly the part I like most about hrefStack, it keeps doing that keyword and placement research continuously in the background so I'm not stuck redoing that work every few weeks by hand.

 That is the half I would have picked too, until last week handed me a counterexample.

I took first reply slots on three fresh posts from accounts much larger than mine, which is the best placement the platform sells. They returned 13 views, 19 views and 1 view. Right room, right moment, right audience, and nothing moved.

So placement sets the ceiling and something else sets the floor. A thread carries you only as far as the parent post travels. A page carries you every day it ranks, which is the one asymmetry I actually trust after this week.

On the keyword side, do you get a real signal before you commit a day to writing, or do you find out the same way I did?

That automation saves a ton of bandwidth. It’s so much easier to focus on crafting relevant responses when the heavy lifting for targeting is handled continuously.
Before committing to content, I look for high intent search volume and low competition gaps to get a baseline signal. Nothing completely eliminates the risk of a flop, but it definitely reduces it!

 That is the part social has no equivalent for.

Five comments last week, same account, same voice, comparable effort. One landed 221 views and the others landed 15, 12 and 9. There was no signal I could read beforehand that would have told me which was which, and honestly there still is not one after the fact.

So reducing the risk is the whole thing. A baseline you can check before you spend the day is worth more than a better hit rate you only find out about afterwards.

Congrats on your launch!

 Appreciate it 🙌 Give it a spin

I would love your feedback on this.

💡 Bright idea

When the keyword agent finds several opportunities around the same topic, how does hrefStack avoid creating articles that compete with each other? Managing keyword overlap seems just as important as finding new keywords especially as a site grows.

 Love this question 😄 We treat clustering as a first-class step, related keywords roll up into a single target page by shared intent, and the agent cross-references your published library before creating anything new. That's how it avoids two articles fighting for the same term.

💎 Pixel perfection

I definitely relate to the distribution struggle, publishing usually falls to the bottom of the list when we are busy shipping code. I noticed hrefStack handles everything from keyword research to publishing on Ghost/WordPress.

Does the agent also monitor when old rankings start to dip and suggest updates to those existing posts?

Refreshing proven content is usually a huge lever compared to just starting new drafts from scratch.

BTW Good luck with the launch, Arsalan!

Spot on Aiden, refreshing winners beats starting from scratch 🙏

Catching ranking dips and flagging posts to update is next on our roadmap,

building this around exactly this kind of feedback.

Finally gave hrefStack a shot this morning and the GSC tracking inside the dashboard is genuinely handy, saved me from flipping between tabs.

 Really glad that landed 🙌 Cutting the tab-switching was the whole reason we built it. What would you want to see in the dashboard next?

The direct WordPress and Ghost publishing flow is genuinely clever, skipping the copy-paste middle step most AI writers force on you. Feels like the team actually thought through the boring parts of SEO work.

 Appreciate that 🙌 Killing the copy-paste step was a must for us. Which platform do you write on most?

Finally found something that actually publishes to my WordPress without me babysitting every step. The Search Console tracking piece is the part that sold me, since most tools just stop at "article written."

 That's exactly the gap we went after 😄 Publish plus track in one place beats juggling five tools. What would you want next to the Search Console data?

Finally gave this a spin and the direct WordPress publishing is genuinely useful. Caught myself wondering how much time I'd save not copy-pasting between drafts and CMS, and the Search Console tracking closes the loop nicely.

 Love that it clicked 🙌 The copy-paste shuffle adds up fast, so closing that loop was the goal. How much of your week goes to publishing right now?

Looks like a complete setup for SEO bloggin! Looking forward to try it anyway. Congrats on the launch.

 Thanks so much 🙏 Hope it earns a spot in your workflow.

Anything you'd want to see when you dig in?

12
Next
Last