Tested whether single-photo AI 3D renders can replace a turntable shoot.
disclosure first — I work on a tool in this space, so weigh it accordingly. not linking it, this isn't that post.
I went in assuming the failure mode would be detail. it isn't. wear survives better than I thought — scuffs, paint marks, a dent all came through on the things I tested. what a single photo genuinely cannot give you is the parts of the object it never saw. the back is inferred, not captured, and on anything with a genuinely different back it shows.
honest read after a lot of tests:
works for a spinning hero shot, social video, a floating cutout on a slide or a plain background
works when the object is roughly symmetrical, or you only ever show the front
doesn't work as a substitute for a real turntable rig when the buyer will inspect the back
doesn't work if you need something dimensionally accurate rather than something that looks right
curious whether anyone here has run the same test and got a different result, particularly on objects with a very different front and back.

Replies
Tested this on furniture last month, same exact result — front looked real, the back was pure guesswork.