LET'S FIX EUROPE FOR STARTUPS – AMA with Andreas Klinger & EU-Inc
Hi, I'm Andreas Klinger, investor at Prototype Capital and former CTO of Product Hunt.
LET'S FIX EUROPE FOR STARTUPS
We (the @euinc_petition crew) is on Monday again in Brussels. We want your input beforehand.
What questions about EU-Inc do you have?
What ideas have you got to improve Europe for Startups?
What feedback or suggestions do you have?
Want to know how you can help?
Europe won't fix itself and it's only impossible until someone simply does it. So, let's do stuff.
What is EU-Inc:
A new pan-European legal entity for startups.
By addressing regulatory fragmentation, EU-Inc seeks to radically simplify founding and pan-European funding of European startup as well as and standardize employee equity options—empowering European startups to scale across Europe and globally. With over 15,000 signatures from the biggest European founders, VCs, and policymakers, this initiative is shaping the future of innovation in Europe.



Replies
First and foremost, @andreasklinger thank you and all of you behind this. You are doing god's work and I am happy to get involved should you need any help.
I know this is not the focus of the bill proposal per se but how can an initiative like this succeed without a fiscal union that allows for a cross European-sized, unified capital markets that would drive healthy and regular venture investment?
Product Hunt
@jordimonpmm
Basically, our hack is to only european-ize capital law (for incorporation, fundraising, stockoptions, captable, etc) and keep taxes + employment law local
None ideal BUT allows us to get it passed.
Brussels might do additional sandboxes/grants/programs for startups to reduce or standardize early stage taxes - but this should be not a hard-link for the entity
@andreasklinger Look, it's fantastic starting point. I hope this gets implemented.
From twitter/X: @__snamber https://x.com/__snamber/status/1890050187889930402
Product Hunt
@__snamber @euinc_petition
fwiw i agree on all points
one thing we are pushing for with EU-Inc (and why its so powerful as a project) is that all stock options are taxed as capital gains – or differently put: stock options would only be taxed when exiting a company (not like salary or other madness thats currently happening in many countries)
imho there should be a group starting a project on deferring EXIT taxes in Europe - it's a bigger topic that we can't cover w/ eu-inc
From twitter/X: @SergeyPopescu https://x.com/SergeyPopescu/status/1890051468151185910
@euinc_petition re (1) that is exactly what we're doing. We call it the EU FAST. It's basically an EU SAFE that builds on top of EU Inc.
re exit: absolutely, exit is a big issue in Europe. We need clear rules and deep, liquid markets that unified across Europe to enable our founders to IPO in Europe rather than in NYC.
from twitter/X: @thiago_peres https://x.com/thiago_peres/status/1890076732927205516
Product Hunt
@thiago_peres @euinc_petition win-win-win
Raycast
What's happened in the 4 months since @EU-Inc launched?
EU-Inc
@chrismessina Lots!
15,000 people signed.
A full proposal was developed (https://proposal.eu-inc.org/) and delivered to the Commission
EU Inc held meetings with the teams of four responsible Commissioners
At the World Economic Forum, President of the European Commission voiced her support for ambitious proposals and creating a new pan-European entity
The EU Commission committed to developing a legislative proposal by Q4 2025
Raycast
@vojtech_horna awesome, thanks for that!
Thoughts on the 200B€ being allocated for AI development?
Everyone knows EU problem with the startups are the regulations that suffocate the startup environment. I would breakdown it down in two main points:
Not all startups are equal - regulations are generally a good thing and EU is trying to protect people from abuse from the tech giants. However when they make such regulations the problem is that they also choke the small startups at pre-seed / seed stage. The most recent example for that is the MiCAR regulation where the crypto startups must start with at least 50K capital (CASP level 1). So no chance for bootstrapping there, while the technology itself allows anyone to start with just 1K (or less) capital. In this case it would be better to have exception for startups that are starting and want to try MVP.
Regulations can't fight the corruption - many if the regulations are invented to fight frauds. But the frauds continue because of the corruption. When there is no one who enforce the law, the regulations can't save you, but certainly they choke the startup ecosystem.
From twitter/X: @Lukaesch https://x.com/Lukaesch/status/1890138964172198182
Product Hunt
@Lukaesch @euinc_petition
Employment law and taxes will stay on local level
The reason: the member states wouldn't want to give up that kind of power and never let it pass – unless you cripple it to some niche audience and burden it with all kinds of unfavorable aspects
Our suggestion:
a lean/clean entity for anyone (standard incorp, investments, stockoptions, etc etc – but employment/tax local)
then separately and distinct from each special programs to support startups with their own criteria of acceptance (eg something for the first 3 years etc - but disconnected from any kind of reincorporation)
@andreasklinger is this not a duplication of Pieter's initiative? see here, here and here.
combining efforts has a greater chance of success, surely
Europe has incredible startup potential, but structural barriers often push founders to the US. Addressing funding, regulation, and scalability issues could unlock the next wave of global tech giants. Looking forward to this discussion! 💡
From twitter/X: @martindonadieu https://x.com/martindonadieu/status/1890050189127454790