AI agents are becoming capable of diagnosing problems, using tools, and executing real actions.

But intelligence does not automatically create authority. Before allowing an agent to modify a workflow, send a payment, publish content, or change production systems, what evidence would you need to see?

For example:
A dry run showing the predicted outcome?
The exact action, resource, and time window?
A human approval gate?
A single-use authorization?
An audit trail and verified readback after execution?

We are exploring this question while building BOSAI, a control plane for governed AI execution. I m interested in how other founders and operators define the minimum acceptable trust boundary.