AI Emaily - Your AI inbox that writes like you + replies on autopilot

AI Emaily is the AI-native inbox that runs like your chief of staff. It reads every message, triages what actually needs you, and quiets the noise. It drafts replies in your own voice — not generic AI text — then schedules and sends across Gmail, Outlook, and any provider from one inbox. Three modes: Manual, Copilot, Autopilot. You approve, it acts, with undo and a full audit trail on everything. Your mail is never used to train models. Start free.

Add a comment

Replies

Best

Curious how "drafts in your own voice" actually works at the start — do I need to feed it a bunch of past emails, or does it figure that out from a few samples?

 Neither — no bunch of past emails, no sample-hunting. At the start you set your tone directly in the Context brain (plus optional client profiles for specifics), so it's on-voice from the very first draft instead of guessing from data. Set once, refine with the odd edit — you're always in control of what it knows.

Check our use cases for different features →

How does it actually learn my voice well enough to draft replies, and is there a sample size or warm-up period where the output might feel off before it gets it right?

 No warm-up period and no minimum sample — that's the part we flipped. You set your voice up front in the Context brain (your details, tone, optional client profiles), so drafts read like you from the very first one instead of feeling off until it "gets it." The odd edit you make just sharpens it. You control what it knows and how it sounds.

Check our use cases for different features →

How does it actually learn my voice well enough to draft replies I'd send myself without me tweaking every message?

 The trick is you don't wait for it to "learn" — you set your voice up front in the Context brain (your details, tone, optional client profiles), so drafts land close enough to send from the first one, not after weeks of tweaking. The small edits you do make just sharpen it further. You stay in control of exactly what it knows and how it sounds.

Check our use cases for different features →

Nafiul, congratulations on the launch! Writing in someone's voice is probably one of the hardest AI problems. How do you prevent the model from sounding overly polished or "AI-ish" over time?

 Thank you, Luki 🙏 And you're right — it's one of the hardest problems, which is exactly why we don't leave it to the model to guess. Your voice comes from the Context brain you set (real details, tone, quirks, optional client profiles), so it stays you instead of drifting toward generic "AI-ish" polish over time. It's anchored to what you defined, not to an averaging model — and every edit keeps it honest. Check our use cases for different features →

How does the "drafts replies in your own voice" actually work at the start — do you need to feed it old emails to learn your tone, or does it pick up your style from somewhere else?

 No old emails to feed in — it picks up your style from the Context brain you set at the start (your details, how you like to sound, plus optional client profiles for specifics). That's why it's on-voice from the first draft instead of needing history to learn from. Set once, refine with the odd edit, fully in your control.

Check our use cases for different features →

inbox management is one of those things that sounds trivial until you're spending 2 hours a day on it. the triage piece alone is worth a lot

 Exactly — it sounds trivial until it's quietly eating 2 hours a day 🙌 That's why we made triage do real work: it reads the signal, floats what actually needs you, and quiets the rest, instead of keyword-sorting. Glad the triage piece landed for you, Shubham.

Check our use cases for different features →

How does it actually learn my voice well enough to draft replies I trust, especially in the first few weeks before it has much to go on?

 That "first few weeks" gap is exactly what we sidestepped — it doesn't need much to go on. Your voice lives in the Context brain you define up front, so trustworthy, on-voice drafts start on day one rather than after it's watched you for a while. And you don't have to trust it blind: keep it in Copilot (drafts wait for your click) until you're comfortable, then hand lanes to Autopilot.

Check our use cases for different features →

How does the voice matching actually work in practice? Does it learn from my sent mail, and how long does it take before the drafts stop sounding generic and start reading like me?

 No sent-mail learning and no "generic until it warms up" phase. In practice you set your tone in the Context brain (plus optional client profiles), and it drafts from that — so it reads like you from the first reply, not after N emails. The edits you make just tighten it further. You decide exactly what it knows and how it sounds.

The undo and audit trail on every action shows real thought about trust, not just a flashy AI demo.

 Appreciate you catching that 🙌 Undo + a full audit trail on every action weren't afterthoughts — they're the whole reason you can trust an agent with your inbox. Flashy demos are easy; earning the right to send on your behalf isn't. Thanks for the thoughtful read, Saadet.

Check our use cases for different features →

The three-mode setup (Manual, Copilot, Autopilot) is

smart, most AI inbox tools force an all-or-nothing

trust decision on day one, this lets people ease in

instead. The "drafts in your own voice, not generic

AI text" claim is the hard part to actually deliver

though, that's where most of these tools fall apart

for me personally. How many messages does it need to

see before the voice actually starts sounding like

you instead of a template?

Also appreciate the no-training-on-mail line being

stated upfront rather than buried in a privacy

policy. Congrats on the launch.