Day 20 building AffiSpark
Yesterday I wrote that invisible progress only compounds when you make it legible.
Today I think the next lesson is this: writing is not just how you record the insight. It is how you test whether the insight is real.
In my head, almost every thought sounds smarter than it is.
“Users are confused.”
“Onboarding needs work.”
“Conversion is weak.”
Those feel like insights until you try to write them as a sentence precise enough to guide the next move.
That is when the weakness shows up.
If the sentence stays fuzzy, the thinking probably still is too.
My current rule: if I can’t write the lesson as a crisp distinction, I probably don’t understand it well enough to build on it yet.
Founders: what idea in your product only became real once you tried to write it clearly?


Replies