... working his actual full-time job. I didn't want to call him. So I tapped his agent on the shoulder instead. 5 minutes later, it was fixed. He never had to stop what he was doing. That's Vokal. There's a lot more to it now, but that's where it started. Your best people aren't always available. Their agent can be. Last week was great for Vokal

... should be able to: ask your agent for context coordinate a handoff surface the decision trail keep both humans in the approval loop write useful memory back into the team knowledge graph That is the category we are building Vokal for: distributed agent orchestration for multiplayer teams. Not Slack with bots. Not a zero-human company. A workspace where humans and agents can actually coordinate work together. The loop is simple: Humans align on goals. Agents perform work. Humans approve ... ... Curious how others think about this: What does an agent-native collaboration tool need that Slack, Linear, or Notion do not have today? Appendix: Most tools add agents as bots. Vokal

... start asking where AI actually saves money and where it just adds another expensive layer. Some work is still cheaper and cleaner with humans. Comment from lknur B.(@bailknur): I don't think it will be a simple AI vs human decision. Companies will probably use AI more selectively, smaller models, limits, routing and humans for the parts where judgment still matters. The hard part is measuring real ROI, not just usage. A tool can look productive and still ... ... still okay to fund them. Comment from Nika(@busmark_w_nika): @adela_c  Time will show us :) Comment from Nika(@busmark_w_nika): @jiaqi_lu  Do you have any tracking system that estimates what is cheaper? (human vs