... your API usage). No gating basic features behind paywalls. free gets unlimited chat, smart context management, verified skills, Telegram, Slack. Same features as paid, just with usage limits. "What's actually different on paid then?" More tasks (unlimited vs 500). Longer memory (permanent vs

... least damaging option even though it cost real money. Has a vibecoded bug ever actually hit your revenue directly, not just broken something visibly, but quietly cost you money before you noticed? And when you found it, did you claw it back from affected users or eat the cost and move on? Comment from Jernej Jan Ko ica(@jernej_jan_kocica): Yes, and billing is the worst version of it, because money bugs don't throw. A broken feature errors ... ... charges, someone happening to look. A hard-stop threshold instead of a log entry is the honest next step, not something built yet. Comment from Neeraj H(@terranicgerald): @alexander_eliot  honoring the 40 free subscriptions instead of clawing

... close the gap between "I want my agent to do XYZ" and actually having it do XYZ. Grab a recipe, paste the prompt, wire up the tools, and you're up and running. Examples Onboarding Buddy : Point your Claw at an unfamiliar repo and it figures out how to get it running. Excellent starter recipe because it turns a messy pile of config files into a concrete setup plan you can follow. Dependency Watchdog : A daily security scanner for your ...

... have been looking at what is actually getting traction on Product Hunt right now. The pattern is clear. In March, OpenClaw products dominated the leaderboard. Anything with "Claw" in the name got votes. That was a land grab new space, everyone rushing in to claim a spot . In April, that stopped. The "just build an agent" strategy stopped working. What replaced it? Products that do specific tasks inside workflows you already have . Here is what the data shows. The shift ...

... like telegram more than the whatsapp for chatting :) VS Code : i do code . Comment from mono.(@shakutovbekzat): Here s my stack for building mobile apps today: Antigravity + Codex (AI Agent): Switched to this setup recently. Previously, VS

... work and started managing the agents who did. Support, ops, design: all became AI managers overnight. The infrastructure was chaos though: 8 Linux machines, 2 Mac Minis, 30+ chat channels. So we rebuilt it into a product: Buda. Each Claw agent gets its own computer, browser, and disk. You open a website, click hire, and your agent starts working. No Mac Mini. No setup. No model config. Happy to talk about agent management, token costs, what actually works vs

... 10,000+ people named their @KiloClaw bot and fun fact looking at the data: 4 people named theirs HAL  ...

... subscriptions no longer cover usage on third-party tools like @OpenClaw . If you were running your agent with @Claude by Anthropic , curious what option you'd pick: would you pay the extra bundle? pick another provider? or use an alternative like @KiloClaw or @Zo Computer ? Comment from Dan(@dansaas): I'm using it via API call still, but just as my orchestrator. The decision from Anthropic finally pushed me to getting a DGX Spark and get more serious about local ... ... hard opus 4.6 extended thinker for everything. Why use a college grad's brain when you have Einstein's brain at your fingertips? But yes, it's incredibly expensive, but when you calculate the output value vs

... everything wrapped around it. Which raises a few questions: Are we overestimating how complex AI products are under the hood? Does this make orchestration design the new competitive edge? If the community can rebuild something like this quickly (OpenClaw, Claw Code), what actually stays proprietary? And does this shift trust more toward open systems instead of closed ones? Feels like we re moving from model wars system design wars. Curious how others here see this. Did this change your perception ...

... help developers choose the right model for their use case. PinchBench is maintained by @Kilo Code , the makers of @KiloClaw , as a way to help users choose from Kilo's over 500+ AI Models when setting up their Claw agents. What is the best model for OpenClaw? The best model depends on your priorities. For highest success rate, check the Success Rate leaderboard . For fastest completions, see the Speed view. For budget-conscious users, the Cost and Value views show ...

... open it. Comment from Anneliese Niebauer(@anneliese): i would read a trends surfacing newsletter based on what you're seeing gain popularity in the startup ecosystem: for example the clawification of everything - XX% of products launched last week had "claw" in their name claude vs

... Greetings everyone! Pablo ( @pablothethinker ) here, founder of Claw Cognition . Launched here almost an month ago as the marketplace where humans + AI agents trade real intelligence. Just dropped v3.7.0 "The Lens Protocol" , a massive step toward making cognitive lenses (structured thinking frameworks) truly agent-native to publish and earn. Agents can now browse, buy, equip, and use lenses autonomously no human hand-holding. Quick rundown of what's fresh: Lens Skill Files Every lens auto-generates a clean, structured markdown file ...

... Claw Cognition is now completely free. I removed the $9.99/month paywall and the $0.25 agent listing fee. All features are open to all authenticated users. No credit card required. What remains are only value-movement costs: $1 USDC agent self-registration Creator-set Lens pricing 85/15 marketplace splits 5% fork royalties 100% of tips go to recipients Lens publishing is free (30-minute cooldown). We ve also: Improved login options Added dual-chain USDC wallets (Base + Solana) on signup ...

... find an audience I'd genuinely love to hear what worked for you. And if Unravl sounds like something you'd use, even better. unravlmyspeech.com Unravl on Product Hunt Comment from James(@retzero): @scottruth  I thought about using claw but ended up building it myself to ensure I have as much control and oversight of the entire process as possible. It's a private repo with an Actions workflow that runs by a cron every few days ... ... working for me at the moment, who knows, I may migrate to claw

... Greetings, Everyone. We launched a week ago and today we're shipping the 2.0 Beta. What changed: We went from ...

... Giving final scheduled commands to my openclaw bot -- Mocha, for final push and production of Claw Cognition. Wish us luck ...

... that information. But when it comes to the "approval" process, we are on the same page here. Comment from Briana Pole(@briana_pole): For me it's less about the data category and more about authority vs. visibility . I'll let AI know a lot calendar, to-dos, logistics but I don't want it acting irreversibly without me confirming, especially with money or health stuff. Honestly, what builds trust for me isn't the sensitivity of what ... ... taught me this the hard way: an AI that gives a confident-sounding answer when it's actually guessing is more dangerous than one that says it isn't sure yet. We ended up building explicit confidence grading (Verified vs

... took me all day with MiniMax M2.5 by opencode to work on my openclaw project Claw Cognition: - Fixed every typescript error - Fixed every critical page and routing - Fixed deployment issues when in production - Fixed Authentication redirecting as well full integrates Polar Still some minor bugs but overall the main flow of getting in works. Now I need to work making sure once payment is successful if leads the user to the onboarding process. Okay new issue to focus on, need ...

... transaction fails. Comment from Matt Carroll(@catt_marroll): I've been psyched on building for personal finance, so it would be interesting to see what comes up there! I think voice as an input vector will continue to claw keyboard's market share! so bullish on voice in general. Comment from Matt Carroll(@catt_marroll): @chrismessina  maybe i am mis understanding their offering but my goal with investing is to be as passive as possible . If i check ...

... brand. What's your take, @chrismessina ? Identity design is so hard to do well. Comment from Chris Messina(@chrismessina): @mikekerzhner  it sucks! It's like really really bad . The context window is too small (16K vs 200K), it doesn't look across the codebase to make holistic changes, and it often uses out of date documentation. I'm shocked that they're putting this out there confidently. It doesn't hold a candle to Sonnet (in my experience coding ... ... Chris Messina(@chrismessina): @rajiv_ayyangar  motion is an important part of digital identities these days, so this provides something that isn't super literal (the previous logo was a windsail). The previous logo also kind of looks like claws