... thing we noticed: most of the Copilot/Cursor frustration isn't really about cost it's that they suggest code but you still do all the work. Copy, paste, test, commit, push. That's not an AI engineer, that's autocomplete with a subscription fee. AUREM commits directly to GitHub no PR, no terminal. Might be worth a look if your team is re-evaluating right now. Happy to share more if anyone's curious. Comment from Jim Jeffers(@jim_jeffers ... ... switch is actually less painful than it sounds. No team governance headache, no justifying a flat seat cost when you're shipping slowly. You only pay when you're productive. The harder question is whether to stay in the VS

... near future that integrates 350+ tools into a single system, including 24/7 monitoring tools for business/company risk and management, as well as tools to integrate AI into laboratory machines and other medical devices. The main focus is: - Advanced autocomplete for coding (faster, more context-aware than traditional AI coding assistants) - Medical intelligence support (helping analyze data, summarize cases, and assist decision workflows) What makes this AI different: Deep tool integration Instead of just chatting, the AI can directly use hundreds ... ... tools to execute tasks in real workflows. Smarter coding autocomplete

... hitting 80%+ of my limit almost every day. Worth every penny. - Cursor: Using about 60% of fast requests. Solid value. - ChatGPT: Maybe 20% usage. I was using it mostly as a Claude backup when rate-limited. - Copilot: Under 10%. VS Code autocomplete

... done. Perfect for prompt templates. 2. Help Search Search all features with real-time highlighting. Type "export" see 17 matches navigate with Enter. 3. Floating Toolbar Select text toolbar appears format instantly. Bold, italic, link, highlight. 4. XML Tag Autocomplete Type <thi  autocomplete

... distinction. the "right code" part is where it gets interesting because you're thinking about architecture and tradeoffs, not just syntax.  Comment from Anders T.(@atherkildsen): @pedro_marchal this is a really solid breakdown honestly. the "thinking" vs "typing" distinction totally makes sense - i've been bouncing between both too and hadn't really put it in those terms before. feels like claude code is better when you're staring at a refactoring problem for like 20 mins ... ... Comment from Tokyo Dal(@tokyodal): AI For Developers lists and compare all of them! Comment from Avery Tribbett(@averytribbett): @hussain_attari  Personally, I had the same issue, but I started using the ESC button to cancel out an autocomplete

... model Codex is out, and already it feels like a giant leap forward. It's faster, more accurate, and starting to feel less autocomplete-y and more like an actual coding sidekick. But every time one of these bounds happens, I can't help but wonder what it means for how we actually build. Are we heading toward a world where we still code, or mostly just make slight adjustments on what AI offers? Seriously curious to know: Does this ... ... been using Cursor for nearly six months but haven t yet started exploring CodeX. AI coding can indeed help many people quickly realize simple ideas. For example, there was a time when I needed to scrape SEO content from competitor

... this point, all of the AI coding assistants are in the same neighborhood. Decent at "advanced autocomplete", OK at code generation sometimes, and most are somewhere in the process of incorporating code context mechanisms. But what's next? Agentic behavior? Something else? My pet prediction is that we will see the emergence of a new programming language that's designed for use with AI and can be translated to a variety of popular languages. (Or if we're cursed, just ... ... javascript ) Comment from Jawad Tijani(@jawad_tijani): AI coding tools are solid right now: great at autocomplete

... been using @Spacemacs for a few years now. Recently, I started using @VS Code to "see what I was missing". I liked that linters and such seemed to work a bit smoother out of the box. I kept hearing: VSCode