Forums

Clay vs Apollo vs manual research. What actually works?

I ve been experimenting with different ways to build outbound lists recently.

The usual tools show up quickly.

Clay. Apollo.
A bunch of automations promising endless leads.

And they are useful.

How many of those 47 cold emails your prospect got today were from someone they'd heard of?

Content is your best tool to do just that.
Content allows you to:

Establish credibility

Show you understand their pain
Build a connection before even reaching out
When you post regularly whether it's about industry insights, product use cases, or personal experiences you start warming up your leads before you send that first email.

By the time you reach out, they already recognise you. They re already engaged. They already trust you.

We doubled our pricing and got more paying users

When we launched Starnus our competitors were charging $100+/month. So we thought let's undercut them. Start at $20. Make it a no brainer.

Signups were great. Payments? Almost zero.

Here's what actually changed our MRR:

1. Cheap pricing kills trust

How many startups launch without pricing page or maybe remove it after the launch?

I ve had a lot of conversations lately, and there s one pattern that keeps showing up.
You launch. Signups roll in. Everything feels great.
But as the product grows, pricing becomes a mess.
More complexity. Harder to manage. And suddenly, you're stuck.

Do you double down on the product or stop and figure out pricing?

For most teams, it becomes one of two paths:
Path 1: You treat pricing like a product. Features, tiers, plans, discounts it becomes its own development cycle.
Path 2: You and your team scribble numbers into a spreadsheet and hope it works.

Neither scales.

Flexpricep/flexpriceshreya chaurasia

1mo ago

How do you understand the difference between interest and intent?

Two conversations. Same week.

First founder said,
Really interesting product. Love what you re building.

Great energy. Smart questions. Strong validation.

We never heard back.

Claude by Anthropicp/claudeNika

1mo ago

People are switching from OpenAI to Claude following Sam Altman's announcement today.

TL;DR: Anthropic refused to sign a contract with the Pentagon that would have allowed the U.S. military to use all of its models without restrictions. Anthropic insisted on an exception, and brace yourself, that its models cannot be used: 1) for mass surveillance of citizens, 2) for autonomous killing. Now the administration is threatening that if the founder of Anthropic doesn't change his mind by a certain date, they will come after him.

Google, OpenAI, and Musk (Grok) have all signed the contract.

Following Sam Altman's announcement over the past few hours, people have been speaking out massively about cancelling their OpenAI subscriptions and subscribing to Claude.

Have you ever felt like building is easier than being seen?

Being consistent with content is harder than building features. Here me out.
Shipping a feature feels productive.
There s momentum. There s code.
There s progress you can measure.

Content? You show up. You write. You post.
And most days, nothing happens.

No clear feedback loop. No passing test case.
No deploy notification saying success.
Just impressions. Maybe.

Building product rewards logic.
Content rewards patience.

What if your 95%+ retention hides a 60-day sales cycle?

From the outside, it looks simple.
Strong retention. Happy customers. Steady growth.

What most people don t see: our average deal takes ~60 days to close.

Some move faster. Many don t.
And that changes how you run GTM entirely.

Long sales cycles stretch everything:

Jace Yoo

2mo ago

Is Product Hunt a good place to post an open-source software launch?

Hi, I'm working on an open-source project for mobile developers and I'm curious: is Product Hunt a good place to launch?

We've met several folks who are only interested in commercial apps, so I have no idea where to introduce our open-source product to the public.

I'm specifically looking for people who are building mobile apps and want to boost their user engagement.

Thanks in advance.

Introducing the Flexprice MCP Server.

You shouldn t need to open five dashboards just to change pricing.

Now you don t.

Plug Cursor, Claude Code, VS Code, Gemini, Windsurf or any MCP-compatible client directly into your Flexprice workspace and prompt your billing infrastructure like it s code.

There’s a phase every AI startup goes through.

At first, it s simple.

  • Stripe handles subscriptions.

  • If something breaks, you manually adjust it.

  • A credit here. An invoice tweak there.

Let s fix it properly later.

Starnusp/starnusAyda Golahmadi

2mo ago

Marketing has changed. Here's proof.

I posted a random thread on X about the cost of living in the Netherlands. Nothing about what we're building. Just genuine thoughts about life in the Netherlands.

It hit 1M+ impressions. And here's the weird part we got a ton of signups and paid users for Starnus from it. Without ever mentioning the product.

Meanwhile, my "here's what Starnus does" posts? Way less engagement.

This genuinely messed with my head. I'm sharing the actual X post below

What’s one metric you trust more than likes and signups?

Startup land rewards motion.
Announcements, launches, funding headlines, feature drops - it all looks like acceleration.

But visible activity isn t the same as real progress.

Shipping fast doesn t mean you re building the right thing.
Raising capital doesn t mean you found product-market fit.
Talking about scale doesn t mean you solved anything painful.

A lot of ecosystems reward velocity because it s easy to measure.
Markets reward outcomes because they re impossible to fake.

Today’s proud moment: our Product Hunt badge is on the site

We added two Product Hunt badges to starnus.com.
#1 Product of the Day and #4 Product of the Week.

Feels good having them there. Thanks again to everyone who supported the launch.

What does “good marketing” even mean in 2026, when everyone can ship and everyone can post?

Emergent isn t just doing marketing. They re making it feel inevitable.

They picked a moment with attention gravity (India AI Impact Summit in Delhi), then stacked surfaces that create I keep seeing them energy:

  • Billboards across the city + Economic Times print ads

  • A narrative number big enough to force curiosity: $100M ARR run-rate in 8 months

  • Credibility signals and proximity without being subtle

  • And a product unlock right after: now on mobile, build from your phone

The genius is they re not explaining the product.
They re engineering belief: this is the platform, everyone s building, you re late.

Can you really do outcome-based pricing if you can’t measure outcomes?

Last week I met a Voice AI company. We barely talked product. The real heat was pricing, not how much, but what exactly are we charging for?

They don t want per-minute, per-seat, or per-API-call anymore. They want per resolved call, per booking, per qualified lead, per deflection.

Sounds clean. Until you try to define resolved.
Who validates it?
What if their CRM says something else?
What if attribution breaks?

At that point, the metric becomes the product. And the infrastructure behind that metric becomes the business model.

Are credits becoming the default pricing language for AI products?

Subscription pricing struggles when value is variable.
Pure usage pricing is accurate, but messy to explain, messy to predict, and easy to hate when the bill surprises you.

Credit-based pricing sits in the middle:

  • Simple for customers: I bought 10,000 credits

  • Flexible for teams: bundle tokens, GPU time, storage, calls into one unit

  • Better for finance: prepaid revenue, clearer burn, fewer billing shocks

  • Better for product: you can experiment with packaging without rebuilding billing every time

The bigger trend is this:
We re moving from pricing as a plan to pricing as a runtime.

Max Musing

2mo ago

We paid $25k for our website. I vibe-coded a new one in 2 days.

Last year we hired a design agency to build our marketing site for @Basedash. They did an incredible job. The headline makes it sound like I'm dunking on them, but I'm not. The site was genuinely great. They built it in Framer so we could manage content ourselves, which was a completely reasonable bet at the time (and something we explicitly asked for).

Why does running one outbound motion feel like orchestrating four different systems?

Every Monday, this is my GTM reality-

  • One tool for prospect discovery + enrichment.

  • One for basic LinkedIn workflows.

  • Another just for LinkedIn messaging.

  • And a separate one for email sequences.

Same list. Same campaign. Different dashboards.

If I want to remove one company, I remove it everywhere.
If I pause outreach, I double-check multiple tools to make sure nothing accidentally goes out.

Is ambition contagious or is burnout?

Spend enough time around driven builders, and your standards rise. You want to ship faster. Do more. Stay ahead.

That part is powerful.

But here s what I ve been noticing about myself:

I treat growth as urgent.
I treat health as optional.
Deadlines feel fixed.
Sleep feels flexible.
Momentum feels critical.
Recovery feels negotiable.