There s a point where products stop being fully understandable.

Too many features
Too many dependencies
Too much history

And decisions start getting made with partial context.

Everyone has their strengths and weaknesses. Not everyone has a knack for marketing, content creation, community building, or other techniques. When it comes to marketing, what have you found to be the best tools and strategies to market your product when it's not your strength?

They say the best investment is in your health. (I agree, although I have to admit I don t really stick to that myself.)

Right now, health is mostly being supported at the level of:

physical fitness (workout apps, weight-loss tools, smart devices for heart-rate tracking, step counters)
mental health (e.g., digital detox apps, a personal therapist in your phone)
longevity (more of a long-term process, experimenting across different areas)

At the beginning, we tried to define pricing early. Plans, tiers, limits: everything looked clear. But once we started getting real users, things changed. Feedback came in. Some features were used more than expected. Others not at all. Sometimes it felt like the first pricing we defined was just a "starting point", not the final one.

From your experience:

Did you change your pricing after launching?

And how important was the first pricing you defined for launch?

Between Slack channels, Teams groups, WhatsApp threads, and Telegram I feel like I'm in a constant catch-up loop and I still miss things. Curious if this is just us or if it's universal. What's your actual number, and have you found anything that helps?

Today, I read a study showing that social media use is linked to weaker reading, vocabulary, and word-recognition skills in teens under 16.
Yesterday, I read an article saying that students who used AI showed up to 55% less brain activity and remembered less.
According to the news, if this is what technology was supposed to help us with and make our lives easier, then I don t see the future very brightly.

On the contrary, I have to say that I use AI for education (e.g. for building, explaining things when I do not understand them). But 80% of people just take the information and do not bother to think about other things.
Yes, we can save a lot of time, and mental capacity/energy with "no memorising" but do we really spend that saved time on something useful and meaningful?

People s motivations for wanting something of their own vary quite a lot.

So far, though, I ve most often heard these three answers:

• To make a lot of money.

• To work really hard until 30 so I can relax later in life.

• Time and location freedom.

We keep hearing: Juniors won t stand a chance.

But companies are still opening internships, which suggests something deeper than just skill-building still matters (like understanding systems, workflows, and how companies actually operate the management part).

PLG was the backbone of some of the fastest-growing companies in history.

Slack grew by making team invites frictionless. Dropbox gave you free storage for every referral. Zoom let you host 40-minute meetings without a credit card. Those models worked because reducing friction was enough.