VibeTalent
Find vibe coders who actually ship
157 followers
Find vibe coders who actually ship
157 followers
The marketplace for vibe coders. Build your reputation through streaks, proof of work, and shipping projects consistently.
157 followers
157 followers
VibeTalent
RiteKit Company Logo API
This is needed — the gap between "knows React" and "actually ships" is massive. When we evaluate candidates at MentionFox, we use AI-generated dossiers that pull 30+ dimensions from public data — personality type, communication style, career trajectory — way beyond what a resume shows. The "vibe" fit is real and most hiring tools ignore it. How are you scoring the "actually ships" part?
VibeTalent
@osakasaul by looking at the github repo such as code size, active contributors, active commits, stars etc
VibeTalent
@osakasaul glad you liked it brother
How about quality of design? So much vibe coding is simply templatized..
VibeTalent
@michael_mort Good point, that's actually something we're working on. Right now we track project quality scores based on live URLs, tech stack, and build complexity. Planning to add design evaluation as a signal too. The goal is to surface builders who ship polished products, not just code.
Streak and live URLs show who's consistent, but how do you tell quality apart? Tons of projects are technically "live" but held together with duct tape. Does the vibe score look at activity only, or does it factor in stuff like uptime or actual users?
VibeTalent
@vibewrenchGood question! We go beyond just activity. Every project with a GitHub repo gets an automated quality analysis, we check for test suites, CI/CD pipelines, README quality, code structure, and commit history. Projects also get a quality score badge visible on their card. Live URLs are checked for actual uptime too. The vibe score itself combines project quality (weighted heaviest since it's hardest to fake), client outcomes, tech breadth, consistency, activity, and reputation. So someone with a duct-tape project and a high streak will still score lower than someone with well tested, properly structured code. We're also adding peer endorsements so other builders can vouch for quality.
@abhinav71 Nice, the weighted quality score approach makes a lot of sense — especially penalizing duct-tape projects despite high activity. Curious to see how peer endorsements play out once that's live.
VibeTalent
@vibewrench it's already live now, are you using vibe talent now?
Features.Vote
we've hired a few contractors for features.vote over the years and the evaluation process is always the same mess. going off portfolios and github stars with no real signal on whether someone will actually ship.
the streak + proof of work angle here is exactly the missing signal. bookmarked.
VibeTalent
@gabrielpineda Thanks Gabriel! That's exactly the frustration we built VibeTalent to solve, portfolios and GitHub stars don't tell you if someone actually ships consistently. The hire feature is already live, just visit any builder's profile, hit the Hire button, and send them a message directly. No middleman, no fees. You can filter builders by streak length, badge level, and vibe score on the Explore page to find the most consistent shippers. Would love to hear how it goes if you try hiring through it!
Does this mean, regular coders can't participate in this? and how do you define vibecoder unless they define themselves as vibecoder?
VibeTalent
@nayan_surya98 yes, all coders are able to participate. real coders also vibe code rn
docWind
A developer marketplace built around actual shipping velocity rather than self-reported skills is the right signal ngl. Resumes tell you what someone claims to know and GitHub stars tell you if one project got attention once. The vibe score weighting project quality highest because its "hardest to fake" is the right instinct. I'd want to know if the automated quality analysis flags repos that are technically live but have no error handling and were basically abandoned after the first deploy, that pattern shows up a lot in vibe-coded projects.