Native SDK is the complete toolkit for building beautiful native desktop applications: declarative markup, a predictable message-based state model, a modern component library, and its own native renderer — no browser, no WebView, no compromise.
We teamed up with Vercel and we want you shipping this Friday. May 15 is Vercel Day. Launch your product on Product Hunt that day with the Vercel Day tag and you're on the official Vercel Day leaderboard alongside every other builder going live that day. Top launches win prizes and get serious visibility from a crowd that's already paying attention. This is the move if you've been waiting for a reason to launch. You've got four days. What are you building? Drop it below
How does pricing work once you go beyond the hobby tier — is it purely based on bandwidth and build minutes, or do serverless invocations factor in too? Trying to estimate what a mid-sized Next.js app would realistically run.
Report
I like the focus on native applications instead of browser based solutions. Could adding more sample projects for different industries help developers discover practical ways to use the toolkit?
Report
A built-in cost dashboard showing real-time bandwidth and function invocation spend per project would be huge. Right now I have to dig through usage logs and try to estimate monthly bills myself, which makes budgeting for client work way harder than it needs to be.
Report
Deployed a Next.js site in minutes and the preview URLs just work every time. The DX feels polished without being overengineered, which is rare.
Report
How does memory usage compare with existing desktop frameworks during larger projects?
Report
How does pricing scale once you start getting serious traffic — is there a clear breaking point where it jumps from a flat tier to something unexpectedly higher?
Report
How does pricing actually work for mid-sized projects, and are there any hidden limits on bandwidth or build minutes I should know about before committing?
Reviewers mostly see Vercel as the easiest way to ship frontend projects fast, especially with Next.js. They repeatedly praise git-based deploys, instant preview URLs, sensible defaults, and not having to manage infrastructure. Users say it is strong for MVPs, prototypes, and solo or small-team workflows, with good performance and a smooth interface. Makers of Browserbase, Composio, and daily.dev echo that ease-of-deployment view, though only Browserbase and Composio add specifics. The main complaints are pricing, weak cost visibility, occasional cold starts, and limited analytics or onboarding clarity.
Vercel is my go-to platform for deploying every MVP I build and demo to clients. Setup is fast, previews are instant, and I can focus on building instead of infrastructure. It makes shipping and presenting ideas feel effortless.
What needs improvement
Better guidance for optimizing performance without trial and error especially for non-tech users.
vs Alternatives
For MVPs and quick experiments, it really lowers the friction to ship. 😄
alright, ngl but Vercel was made for the speed of it. deployment and staging, especially the vercel bot that do all of the check before git publish is what I like.
with the recent launch of Vercel drop, I thought it's a major competitor to uselink but turn out it nost, as what vercel drop does is just host the html file, while uselink do all of the collaboration stuffs include password protect, expiry date and set who can view content. so I can consider it's good to just host HTML file
Tried v0 out of curiosity as coding is not my domain & also experiments with deployment always failed. I found v0 good in this aspect but the ai executes a lot of unwanted/unasked stuff also ( some happy discoveries and some flaws so need to roll back a lot ) Building something thats MVP level and making decent progress. But with the new pricing change - this might be affected. Imagine 100+ updates to get to a decent level even with clear requirements!! We'd be paying for the mistakes made by v0..any thoughts on how to mitigate this.
How does pricing work once you go beyond the hobby tier — is it purely based on bandwidth and build minutes, or do serverless invocations factor in too? Trying to estimate what a mid-sized Next.js app would realistically run.
I like the focus on native applications instead of browser based solutions. Could adding more sample projects for different industries help developers discover practical ways to use the toolkit?
A built-in cost dashboard showing real-time bandwidth and function invocation spend per project would be huge. Right now I have to dig through usage logs and try to estimate monthly bills myself, which makes budgeting for client work way harder than it needs to be.
Deployed a Next.js site in minutes and the preview URLs just work every time. The DX feels polished without being overengineered, which is rare.
How does memory usage compare with existing desktop frameworks during larger projects?
How does pricing scale once you start getting serious traffic — is there a clear breaking point where it jumps from a flat tier to something unexpectedly higher?
How does pricing actually work for mid-sized projects, and are there any hidden limits on bandwidth or build minutes I should know about before committing?