TestSprite is the easiest AI agent for frontend and backend software testing, automating the entire testing workflow—from test planning and code generation to execution and debugging. With natural language interaction, seamless coverage for both frontend and backend, and the ability to cut testing costs by up to 90%, it’s the ultimate tool for developers to save time and deliver high-quality software faster.
This is the 5th launch from TestSprite. View more
TestSprite 3.0
Launching today
TestSprite generates and runs end-to-end tests for your app, autonomously.
For backend, we can now generate complex integration tests with dynamic variables, auto-cleanup, and Data Flow debugging.
For frontend, we now send a fleet of parallel AI agents to explore your app first — clicking through every feature like real users, then feeding results into testing. We're the first to do this.
3.0 also adds auto-heal for UI drift, auto-auth for regression, and a CLI for Claude Code, Codex users.
Free Options
Launch Team / Built With
TestSprite
Hey Product Hunt 👋
I'm Yunhao, co-founder and CEO of @TestSprite.
Today we're shipping TestSprite 3.0 — autonomous end-to-end testing that actually understands what your app does, not just what your code says.
✍️ Here's how it works:
Point TestSprite at your live web app or API endpoints. Drop in your PRD or product spec if you have one (strongly recommended — it sharpens what we test).
We send a swarm of AI agents to explore it in parallel — clicking through every feature like real users.
They generate full backend + frontend test suites from what they saw. Then run, debug, and auto-heal them for you.
🚀 What's new in 3.0:
Parallel exploration fleet — dozens of agents map your app before a single test is written. As far as we can tell, no one else is doing this yet.
Backend gets serious — multi-dependency integration tests, Dynamic Variables, Auto Cleanup, and a Data Flow view that makes debugging an agent-generated test feel like debugging your own code.
Frontend tests auto-heal when your UI drifts. Auto-auth keeps nightly regression sane.
Accuracy up ~40% — and it really shows on complex enterprise projects, where most agents fall apart.
Coverage jumped from ~20 to 50+ meaningful cases per run.
CLI for Claude Code and Codex users — coming soon, right inside your terminal.
🎉 Launch day offer: Sign up for our Starter package today and get your first month free.
Come tell us what you'd want TestSprite to break on. We're reading every comment today 🚀
TestSprite
Really impressive release 🚀
@TestSprite @jiao_yunhao Hey Yunhao, congrats on shipping 3.0
The parallel exploration fleet is the part I want to poke at. If dozens of agents are clicking through a live app like real users before any test is written, they are also triggering real side effects: form submits, outbound emails, writes to the DB, burned API rate limits. How does TestSprite contain that? Sandboxed env required, automatic detection of destructive actions, or some dry-run mode for the exploration pass? Asking because "explore like real users" and "do not actually charge the card or email the customer" are in direct tension, and that tension is where exploration agents usually get scary.
E2E testing is not just about generating scripts — it is about understanding which workflows actually matter to users and the business.Curious how TestSprite separates meaningful coverage from noisy coverage. For complex enterprise apps, do the agents prioritize test cases based on the PRD/spec only, or also by app structure, failure severity, role-based flows, and real usage patterns? and can it simulate real scenarios like live meeting and chats ?
TestSprite
@harshalvc_ai Great question. It’s not only PRD/spec-based — TestSprite also considers app structure, role-based flows, auth states, failure impact, and what agents discover during exploration.
@shawnie_shan consider my app needs live interactions, would your product be able to simulate that test. just curious
The autonomous debugging part sounds wild 🤯 How many retries does the system usually need before stabilizing a test?
TestSprite
@ana_popescu2 It depends on the complexity of the workflow 😄
A big focus for us in 3.0 was reducing unnecessary retry loops and making the debugging path much more traceable.
The backend integration testing upgrades sound powerful, especially Dynamic Variables and Auto Cleanup. Can TestSprite also manage dependent API chains with temporary tokens and session-based workflows?
TestSprite
@andrew_paul11 Yes — that’s actually one of the scenarios we designed the backend workflow for. Dynamic Variables + Data Flow tracking allow TestSprite to handle dependent API chains, including temporary tokens, session-based auth flows, and multi-step request dependencies. The goal is to make complex integration testing feel much closer to debugging real application logic rather than isolated API calls.
TestSprite
Appreciate everyone checking out the launch today ❤️
This release took a lot of iteration, especially around autonomous frontend exploration and regression reliability. We wanted TestSprite 3.0 to go beyond simply generating test scripts, and actually understand how users move through an app before creating tests.
Excited to hear your feedback and keep improving it from here!
Congrats on the launch!
The parallel exploration fleet really caught my attention because most testing tools still operate sequentially. How do you coordinate multiple agents without them duplicating the same testing paths repeatedly?
Generating 50+ meaningful cases automatically is a massive jump compared to traditional approaches. How do you internally define “meaningful” coverage versus repetitive or low-value test cases?