We launch a feature here on Thursday, and the landing page section for it is the one new users keep bringing up on calls and in replies, more than the hero, more than pricing.
It is a simple block. One sentence: see the change before it ships. One picture of a working copy of your site with the change on it, and two buttons: approve, or send it back.
I think it works because it answers the question people actually have about any tool that writes code for them: what if it gets it wrong? The answer is not trust us , it is look at it first . The other sections explain what it does. This one removes the fear.
Curious what the equivalent section is on your landing page: the one that answers the fear rather than describing the feature. And for those who have run the test, did it convert better than the feature description?
I really like the direction Ovren is taking.
Backlog entropy—tech debt, small bugs, and “we’ll get to it later” tasks—quietly piles up and slows teams down over time.
What stands out is that Ovren isn’t just another AI copilot. It focuses on the execution gap—actually picking up tasks and generating review-ready PRs, not just suggestions. That’s a meaningful shift.
@shyam_parse That you captured it perfectly. A lot of real engineering value is stuck in that we will go with later backlog, and that's exactly the gap we want to close.
Good luck!
@dzianis_yatsenka Thank you so much.
@dzianis_yatsenka Thanks!