OpenClaw, the AI that actually does things. Your personal assistant on any platform. Clears your inbox, sends emails, manages your calendar, and checks you in for flights. All from WhatsApp, Telegram, or any chat app you already use.
No reviews yetBe the first to leave a review for OpenClaw (formerly Clawdbot)
As a heavy power user of Poke for proactive, messaging-native assistance on top of my email and calendar, I’m curious: what are some workflows where you’ve seen Clawdbot actually outperform Poke in the real world.
Report
@byrishi Curious, what are some of your best Poke use cases? Wonder if there were any great things, flaws or lacking points that stood out
Report
giving a bot "full system access" is both awesome and terrifying. does it run in a sandbox/container so it can't accidentally rm -rf my home folder if i give a vague command?
I suspect operating systems will eventually become headless, driven by context and intent rather than windows and clicks. This feels like a step in that direction. Congrats.
Report
This is a very “finally” product - assistants that can’t actually do things are basically autocomplete in a tab. The “chat anywhere” idea is especially compelling too: WhatsApp/Telegram as the UI feels like the most natural interface for real life.
I’m curious how you’re thinking about trust when the agent can run commands and touch files - what does the default “safe” experience look like, and how do users review or undo actions when something goes a bit off?
Congrats on the launch - if you nail safety without killing the flow, this becomes something people keep running quietly in the background.
Report
The product is great, and I'd love to use it, but the installation and configuration process is relatively complicated for people without a technical background. It feels like there's a barrier to entry. Is there a simpler way to use it?
“AI that actually does things” is a bold promise. Exposing real system control + chat-first access is powerful, and also where UX, safety, and trust really matter. Curious how you’re thinking about guardrails as people automate more of their daily workflows.
Report
Why does it say Clawbot some places, Clawdbot other places? I heard it's Moltbot now due to Anthropic but now sure why the discrepancy with the old name?
Either way, I got mine setup and been using it! It's been delightful, though I do feel if you could solve the setup complexity to be more user friendly, this thing could absolutely explode. I have to wonder if you're keeping it intentionally a bit more advanced user-centric for now
As a heavy power user of Poke for proactive, messaging-native assistance on top of my email and calendar, I’m curious: what are some workflows where you’ve seen Clawdbot actually outperform Poke in the real world.
giving a bot "full system access" is both awesome and terrifying. does it run in a sandbox/container so it can't accidentally rm -rf my home folder if i give a vague command?
Trailward
I suspect operating systems will eventually become headless, driven by context and intent rather than windows and clicks. This feels like a step in that direction. Congrats.
This is a very “finally” product - assistants that can’t actually do things are basically autocomplete in a tab. The “chat anywhere” idea is especially compelling too: WhatsApp/Telegram as the UI feels like the most natural interface for real life.
I’m curious how you’re thinking about trust when the agent can run commands and touch files - what does the default “safe” experience look like, and how do users review or undo actions when something goes a bit off?
Congrats on the launch - if you nail safety without killing the flow, this becomes something people keep running quietly in the background.
The product is great, and I'd love to use it, but the installation and configuration process is relatively complicated for people without a technical background. It feels like there's a barrier to entry. Is there a simpler way to use it?
Kilo Code
how about a hosted version like @Easyclaw or @KiloClaw?
“AI that actually does things” is a bold promise. Exposing real system control + chat-first access is powerful, and also where UX, safety, and trust really matter. Curious how you’re thinking about guardrails as people automate more of their daily workflows.
Why does it say Clawbot some places, Clawdbot other places? I heard it's Moltbot now due to Anthropic but now sure why the discrepancy with the old name?
Either way, I got mine setup and been using it! It's been delightful, though I do feel if you could solve the setup complexity to be more user friendly, this thing could absolutely explode. I have to wonder if you're keeping it intentionally a bit more advanced user-centric for now
Best of luck and thanks for creating this