Nautis
The AI-native Operating System for founders.
764 followers
The AI-native Operating System for founders.
764 followers
Nautis is the AI-native Operating System for founders. Manage fundraising, planning, finance, documents, meetings, CRM, hiring, and daily operations from one connected workspace. Unlike disconnected SaaS tools, every module shares one AI brain, giving you context-aware automation, smarter insights, and a Chief of Staff that understands your business—not just one app. Spend less time managing tools and more time building.
Been using Nautis for a few weeks now. One thing that would make it even better is a simple integration with my calendar to auto-log meeting notes and action items into the CRM module. Right now I have to copy-paste, which slows things down.
@ayazyask47521 Thanks for the feedback! You can actually do this today by connecting your meeting transcription tool (like Read.ai, Fireflies, or similar). Nautis will automatically log meeting notes and action items into the CRM, so there's no need to copy and paste.
honestly the chief of staff concept is cool but it'd be way more useful if it could draft investor update emails from your actual metrics instead of you having to feed it context every time
@c_kurtar55949 Thanks! That's exactly the direction we're headed. The vision for Chief of Staff is that it already understands your startup through the shared context in Nautis, so it can draft investor updates, board summaries, and other documents from your actual metrics and activity instead of requiring you to recreate the context every time.
Congrats on the launch! Curious how Nautis handles data across modules that need different levels of privacy/access (like fundraising docs vs. day-to-day CRM) — does the "shared AI brain" have permission layers, or is it fully unified?
@imran_rauf Thank you! Great question. The AI brain is shared, but permissions are not. Nautis has role-based and module-level access controls, so fundraising documents, financials, HR data, and CRM can each have different visibility based on a user's role. Our AI Chief of Staff follows those same permission boundaries, meaning it only accesses and responds using information that the current user is authorized to see.
Congrats on the launch! The daily AI Chief of Staff briefing is the part I'd actually use. Most founder tools stop at storage and search, so picking what surfaces each morning is the hard bit. Curious how you decide what makes the cut. Good luck today!
@fujibee Thank you so much! Really glad the AI Chief of Staff briefing resonated with you.
We don't just surface what's new, we surface what needs a founder's attention. The briefing looks at things like runway, upcoming investor meetings, pending follow ups, missed deadlines, approvals, blockers, and other signals across the business. The goal is to help founders start the day knowing what actually matters, instead of spending the first hour piecing together updates from different tools.
Really interesting vision. The idea that every tool knows something but nothing understands the whole business resonates. Curious when different AI models handle different parts of a workflow, how do you keep context consistent across them instead of letting each model develop its own view of the task?
@nextmark Great question! We don't let individual models maintain their own understanding of the business. The business context lives in a central, permission-aware knowledge layer, while the LLMs act as interchangeable reasoning engines. Every model receives the same structured context, works within the same access controls, and writes back to the same source of truth. That keeps responses consistent even if different models are used for different tasks, while letting us choose the best model for each workflow.
@baltejsingh88 This is really clean. Having the business context in a central, permission-aware layer while models act as interchangeable reasoning engines—that's the architecture that scales.
One follow-up: does the permission layer also handle inference cost as part of the decision logic? Like, does Nautis recommend which model to use based not just on the task but on a cost/performance tradeoff configured by the user? Or is that selection still manual?
@nextmark Thank you! That's exactly the direction we're taking.
By default, Nautis intelligently selects the most suitable model based on the task, but founders also have full control. We support models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, as well as several open and free models, so users can manually choose the model they prefer based on cost, performance, or personal preference.
Our focus is to make the business context portable. As better models emerge, founders should be able to switch models without losing the context, workflows, or AI experience they've built inside Nautis.
@baltejsingh88 This feels like the real unlock—making the business context portable so it survives model swaps. That shared worldview across modules is a constraint most teams don't even realize they need until they try moving between Claude and GPT and suddenly lose all the context they built. Excited to see how this surfaces in practice as teams scale beyond the founding team. 🚀
The "nothing knows your business" line really lands. founders already have enough tools, the real problem is that fundraising, finance, meetings, docs, CRM, and daily decisions all live in separate systems with separate context.
The morning Chief of Staff briefing sounds especially useful. as someone building a company with a small team, I'd probably want it to surface what changed, what is blocked, and what actually needs my attention before I open ten tabs :)
Curious how Nautis decides what is important enough to include, and whether founders can tune that over time based on what they act on or ignore.
@andrasczeizel Thank you! You captured the problem perfectly. Founders don't really need another dashboard, they need something that understands what's happening across the business.
That's exactly how we're thinking about the AI Chief of Staff. It prioritizes signals like blockers, missed follow ups, upcoming investor conversations, runway, approvals, delayed milestones, and anything that needs the founder's attention instead of simply listing everything that changed.
And yes, that's where we're headed. Over time, Nautis learns from what founders consistently act on, postpone, or ignore, so the briefings become more personalized and aligned with how each founder prefers to run their company.
fundraising, finance, CRM, hiring and ops all sharing one AI brain sounds great on paper, but each of those is normally its own deep, opinionated tool for a reason. how do you compete with a dedicated ATS on hiring or a dedicated CRM on pipeline management when you're spreading the same AI across 6 different jobs instead of going deep on one?
@omri_ben_shoham1 That's a fair question, and we don't think every company should replace every specialist tool overnight.
Our goal isn't to beat the most advanced ATS or enterprise CRM on every feature. It's to give founders one connected operating system where hiring, fundraising, finance, CRM, meetings, and execution work together instead of living in silos.
For many startups and SMBs, the bigger problem isn't that their CRM or ATS lacks features. It's that none of those tools know what's happening in the rest of the business. That's where the shared AI context becomes valuable. And if a team already uses a best-in-class tool, Nautis can integrate with it so the AI still has the business context without forcing a migration.