Launching today
Easybilling
AI-native billing & payments for usage-based AI products
69 followers
AI-native billing & payments for usage-based AI products
69 followers
EasyBilling is an AI-native billing and monetization platform built for AI SaaS, APIs, agents, and GPU platforms. Launch subscription, usage-based, and credit-driven pricing without building complex billing infrastructure internally. Track API/token usage in real time, manage prepaid wallets and AI credits, automate invoicing, and support global payments — all in one platform. Built for modern AI products that need hybrid pricing, scalable metering, and global monetization.
Products used by Easybilling
Explore the tech stack and tools that power Easybilling. See what products Easybilling uses for development, design, marketing, analytics, and more.
Engineering & Development 1
Engineering & Development 1
GitHubHow people build software
5.0 (602 reviews)
Also considered:
GitLabWe chose GitHub primarily because of its ecosystem, developer adoption, and integration advantages.
For a developer infrastructure product like EasyBilling, being close to where developers already collaborate matters a lot. GitHub has become the default platform for open-source communities, AI tooling, API products, and developer ecosystems, which makes it easier for us to:
• collaborate with external contributors
• share SDKs and documentation
• integrate with developer workflows
• build visibility within the AI developer community
We also found GitHub’s integrations, Actions ecosystem, and overall developer experience particularly strong for fast-moving startup teams.
GitLab is a very capable platform as well, especially for enterprises that want a more integrated DevOps stack or self-hosted workflows. But for our current stage, speed, ecosystem reach, and developer familiarity were more important priorities.
As an AI infrastructure startup, we optimize heavily for developer adoption and iteration speed, and GitHub aligned better with those goals.
General 1
General 1
SendGrid for iOSMonitor your email clicks, opens etc. from your iPhone
5.0 (1 review)
Also considered:
SendGrid and AppsFlyer are actually very different products, so the choice usually depends on the problem you’re solving.
For an iOS app:
SendGrid is mainly used for:
transactional emails
verification emails
password reset emails
email delivery infrastructure
marketing emails
AppsFlyer is mainly used for:
mobile attribution
install tracking
ad campaign analytics
SKAdNetwork support
measuring user acquisition ROI
So normally it’s not:
“SendGrid vs AppsFlyer”
It’s more:
“Email infrastructure vs mobile attribution platform”
A company might choose SendGrid if their immediate need is:
reliable email delivery
lower infrastructure complexity
developer-friendly APIs
onboarding/authentication emails
A company would choose AppsFlyer if they need:
ad attribution
tracking paid installs
measuring Facebook/TikTok/Google campaign performance
mobile growth analytics
For AI/SaaS startups specifically, many early-stage teams prioritize:
product onboarding
auth flows
transactional communication
before investing heavily in paid mobile acquisition analytics, which could explain prioritizing SendGrid first.
Also, AppsFlyer can become relatively expensive and operationally heavier once attribution scales, while SendGrid is usually simpler to adopt early on.