As a hiring manager, I couldn't trust resumes. My team wasted so much time on screening calls, only to find the candidates weren't a match. There was no real proof-of-work, and with AI now writing resumes, the noise is just getting worse.
As a candidate, it was just as frustrating. My past work didn't help me get better roles; it felt like I was starting over every single time because my performance signals were buried in old company HR tools that no one could see.
DiffSense
background checks / references are notoriously unreliable. Stale, outdated, fake, shallow etc. So its definitly a pain to try and solve. I think maybe connecting it more to linkedin could be useful. Like a review from a strong linkedin profile goes a lot longer than 10 goood reviews from noob profiles etc.
Badge
@conduit_design Absolutely, and thanks for pointing this out. So our trustscore works the same way. When a user with higher trustscore gives a review for someone, the trustscore of the reviewee will have a higher boost. Do you have any feedback requests?
DiffSense
@lokesh_motwani1 What is the trust-score made up of?
Badge
@lokesh_motwani1 @conduit_design The Trust Score is calculated using authenticated review from colleagues focusing on essential traits: work quality, reliability, professionalism, communication skills, and resilience under pressure. Key influencing factors - Volume: Accuracy increases as you collect more reviews, Recency: New reviews are given higher priority, Reviewer Credibility: Reviews from users with high trustscore carries more significance andConsistency: Recurrent themes identified across different reviews are heavily weighted.
New users begin with a baseline score of 60. As you maintain a presence on Badge, your reputation grows and compounds, making your professional standing increasingly credible over time.
DiffSense
@lokesh_motwani1 @raaghav_naraayan_m_v Is that system relible tho? It seems easily gameable. Imo score only works when it has scarcity built in. Any system that isnt tied to scarcity will be gamed and thus loss its value. Very hard to solve of course. Im sure you have some ideas on how to solve this in the future. Will be interesting to follow and see how it develops in the future!
@raaghav_naraayan_m_v pairing anonymous submission with work-email verification is smart to fix the honesty problem LinkedIn recommendations have. but how does that work for freelancers and consultants who move between short-term clients rather than a single employer? curious whether you can build a meaningful Trust Score without one fixed email
Badge
@clement_avq Great question! So for that the clients can always drop a review using the linkedin profile of the freelancer they worked with. Apart from that we are also planning to partner up with freelance platforms such as Fiverr,Upwork to bring in more credibility.
@raaghav_naraayan_m_v Great, thanks for the feedback!
The timing for this is right. I have watched the resume lose its signal value this year (200+ applications per role, most AI-polished, all reading identical), and the honest answer to what replaces it has always been some form of verifiable work. Peer reviews collected by agents is an interesting take on that. One question: how do you keep the peer reviews themselves from becoming the next gameable artifact, once people know an agent is collecting them?
Badge
@virko_kask Great question Virko, You are right, Bad users will try to game the system and we have to stay one step ahead always. We will use ML in calculation of trust scores
The hard part here is making the proof portable without turning it into another opaque score. Peer context, recency, and the option to inspect what evidence produced the badge would matter a lot for trust, especially as AI makes resumes easier to polish.
Badge
@krekeltronics absolutely, we did consider that. It all boils down to how the trust score is calculated.
Your Trust Score is built from verified peer reviews across key dimensions like: quality of work, reliability, professionalism, communication, and how you handle pressure.
What affects it:
Volume : more reviews = more accurate score
Recency : recent reviews carry more weight
Reviewer credibility : reviewers with stronger Badge history carry more weight
Consistency : patterns across multiple reviews are weighted heavily
Continuous peer review as proof-of-work is a clever inversion of the reference letter. What stops it drifting into LinkedIn-endorsement inflation where everyone five-stars each other? Genuinely curious how the incentive design handles that.
Badge
@chielephant Thats a wonderful point. Incentive design does not handle this but anonymity of reviews handles this. For linkedin and uber reviews. The feedback giver does not want to be in bad relation with the reviewee because it is public. When we make all reviews anonymous then there is no politeness and people can be honest and thats why we feel, it should not drift to 5 star clusters.
How does the agent actually get people to leave reviews if I haven't talked to old coworkers in years?
Badge
@cafertrf7 great question!
Two things make this work.
Firstly , it becomes a two way culture. When you review a colleague, you're also building your own reputation on Badge. The more people participate, the more everyone benefits. Your colleagues who review you today will want reviews from their own network tomorrow. It's a reciprocal ecosystem where giving is just as valuable as receiving.
Secondly, Badge is designed to be low effort. You're not asked to sit down and write a long thoughtful, structured paragraph about someone. Instead you have a simple conversational exchange with Badge's AI agent.
Does that help?
Badge
@cafertrf7 Great question, the agent nudges the user to give reviews and the order in which it decides for whom to ask review for is important. So if the agent is asking your contact to give reviews, first it will ask it to give the review for you.
How does the agent actually get coworkers to respond - do they need to install something too, or is it just an email link?
Badge
@adem1398592 Yes, the agent works through Badge, so you have to be on Badge to give and recieve reviews! Did any of your coworkers review you yet?
Badge
@adem1398592 The agent will go to the coworker and say - Build your trustscore to get the best opportunities. and the only way tto build the trustscore is to get review and give reviews. Then the agent asks the user to give one review so that it can collect reviews from him. We follow give to get reviews.
Badge
@adem1398592 Yes, Now by doing so, their Trust score is also available in an instant, and they can get started building their trust score from that very instant.