Launched this week
Ava Studio
Your AI creative team for video ads
545 followers
Your AI creative team for video ads
545 followers
Ava Studio researches your product, develops hooks and creative angles, then generates 50+ editable short-form ad variants ready for TikTok, Reels, Meta, and any platform you want to ship on.
the post-launch panic of 'okay now we need ads' is way too real. 50+ variants from one product link means you can actually test angles instead of going all in on one creative and hoping it works
Ava Studio
@tina_chhabra Thanks Tina. That “one creative and hope” loop is exactly what we wanted to kill.
Ava Studio is built so a product link can turn into multiple angles, hooks, scripts, storyboards, and editable variants, then you can keep swapping pieces instead of restarting every time.
so all this means we don't need to hire a whole marketing team once I've use this app, right?
Ava Studio
@maksym_shcherbakov1 Haha, not quite, but we'd love to give your marketing team superpowers.
What Ava Studio helps with is the slow and time consuming part of the process: research, creative exploration, competitor analysis, scripting, content generation, and producing variations to test. What it doesn't replace is the human judgment behind strategy and brand decisions. We're not trying to replace marketers. We just want a small team to be able to do the kind of work that normally takes a much bigger one.
Ava Studio
@maksym_shcherbakov1 Think of it as a creative team that works 24/7, while you stay the founder/marketer. Ava Studio replaces content research, production bottleneck, scripting, shooting, editing, resizing, so a solo founder or small team can ship volume that used to need an agency. But it doesn't replace vision/product strategy: knowing your customer, your offer, and your channel.
The research-first part is the right instinct. The risk with AI ad generation is not usually producing enough variants; it is producing 50 variants that all express the same weak claim with different visuals.
One thing I’d love to see in a workflow like this is an angle map before generation: audience, pain/risk, proof asset, objection, hook family, and why this angle is worth testing. Then when an ad works or fails, the learning attaches to the angle, not just the finished video.
That would make Ava Studio feel less like a content machine and more like a creative testing system.
@jim_jeffers Agreed - my concern too. And does it reflect YOUR voice, style, and quirks? Or is it vanilla AI??
Ava Studio
@anna_ludwinowski Thanks for the question, Anna! This is exactly why Ava starts with research, not a prompt.
Most AI ad tools start generating right away. The problem is they don't know your category, your customer, or what's actually converting in your market, so the output ends up feeling generic.
Ava works the other way. From a product link, it researches your category, analyzes ads already working in your space, and breaks them down by hooks, angles, and audience signals before generating anything. The result isn't just multiple versions of the same idea. It's a range of different creative angles and formats grounded in what is already working for brands like yours.
If you end up giving it a try, we'd genuinely love your feedback. We're still early, and hearing what works (and what doesn't) is how we're making the product better.
@zee77 I guess that's the part that I question a bit - "for brands like yours." But is it mine? Is there an opportunity for Ava to sample MY voice, style, my brand? Maybe an intake that gives Ava a bit of me to infuse?
Ava Studio
@anna_ludwinowski Totally fair question. Right now Ava learns from your product and brand context, then combines that with what it's seeing in the market. You can also upload brand assets to help Ava better understand your voice, style, and positioning. We think the sweet spot is somewhere between staying true to your brand and learning from what's already working.
There's definitely room for us to go further on the brand voice side though. Really like that suggestion:)
Ava Studio
@jim_jeffers Thanks Jim! Yeah this is the right concern.
When we ran Meta ads to promote our own product, the thing that hit us hardest was how much creative angle matters. Generic vs vertical-specific variants performed differently by orders of magnitude. Same product, same actor, different creative direction, and the results weren't even close. The takeaway wasn't "we need better-looking AI ads," it was "we need to test more real creative directions, faster."
So Ava Studio is built more like a testing partner than a content machine. She studies your market, researches what's winning in your category, surfaces real angles you can clone, recommends templates that already proved out, and lets you spin variants you can actually put in front of an audience that week instead of next quarter.
The point isn't to replace creative judgment or generate more AI slop. It's to compress the cycle between "this might work" and "this actually works." If you try it and let us know where it falls short, that's the feedback that helps us most 🙏
That makes sense, and the testing-partner framing is much stronger than “AI ad generator.” I think Anna’s push is the important next layer: “for brands like yours” and “in your actual brand” are different promises.
If Ava can keep those as two visible layers — market/category evidence on one side, brand DNA/source material on the other — users can tell when an angle is borrowed from what works broadly vs. genuinely adapted to their voice. That transparency would build a lot of trust.
Ava Studio
@jim_jeffers That's really insightful. I like the idea of keeping those as two separate layers: what's working in the market, and what's uniquely yours as a brand. Making that distinction visible would definitely help build trust and give people more confidence in why a particular angle was recommended. Appreciate you pushing the conversation deeper.
Looks to work well for physical products - how does it work for a B2C saas product?
Ava Studio
@jacinto_salz Works well for SaaS too. The difference is what goes in the @product ingredients: instead of an image of physical product, you give it screen recording b-roll or UI screenshot, and AVA builds the ads around the use case, a talking actor doing the pitch, weaving in your screen-demo b-roll, before/after of the problem you solve. Hook and script logic is identical; only the visual asset type changes.
being able to turn one winning creative angle into ten new variants with quick hook swaps is exactly what performance marketing needs right now. ad fatigue happens so fast on tiktok, so keeping the asset pipeline fresh is everything. awesome job buddy 👍
Ava Studio
@priya_kushwaha1 Thanks Priya. Appreciate the support!
The best creative workflow is not “make one perfect ad.” It’s find a signal, then keep remixing the angle while it’s still working.
That’s why everything in Ava Studio is editable: hooks, actors, scripts, product shots, CTAs, scenes.
Are you mostly seeing this pain on TikTok, or Meta too?
mailX by mailwarm
Big congrats on the launch. The hardest part of short-form ads is usually coming up with enough strong creative angles consistently, so turning research and hook generation into a faster workflow is genuinely valuable for teams shipping large content. Good job.
Ava Studio
@thamibenjelloun Thanks Thami, really appreciate it.
Exactly. For short-form ads, the hard part is not producing one video. It is finding enough good angles to test consistently.
That is why Ava Studio starts with research first, then turns product, category, and competitor context into hooks, scripts, storyboards, and editable variants.
This is the part that feels most useful to me: starting with research, then turning it into multiple editable ad angles instead of just one polished clip. Very founder-friendly for testing creative quickly!
Ava Studio
@pierlorenzo_peruzzo Thanks! That's exactly the idea. Creative testing is often more valuable than trying to generate a single perfect ad. The faster you can explore different angles, the faster you find what actually works!